public inbox for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@iki.fi>
Cc: Pierre Ossman <pierre@ossman.eu>,
	Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, san@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 7/7] wl12xx: add sdio support
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 21:41:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1244922097.1852.4.camel@violet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bposnmxi.fsf@litku.valot.fi>

Hi Kalle,

> >> This adds the wl12xx_sdio module, enabling the SDIO interface for
> >> wl12xx, as used by the Google G1 phone and others.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
> >> ---
> >
> > I think the drivers looks quite ok. There are really just a few things
> > I'm concerned about:
> >
> 
> [...]
> 
> > - Why do you have a platform device with the sole purpose of enabling
> > power to the SDIO card? Shouldn't this be handled in the arch code?
> 
> wl1251 has these lines to the host:
> 
> o four lines for SDIO or SPI, configured to SDIO by default
> o power line
> o interrupt line
> 
> When the power line is pulled up, the chip will power on itself.
> Whenever the power line goes down, the chip will power off. For example,
> the power line can be controlled with a GPIO pin from the host. But how
> the power line is really controlled, is board specific and should be
> handled in the board file. And here comes the set_power() function to
> the picture. The wl1251 driver will call set_power() function every time
> user space calls wlan interface up or down.
> 
> Pierre, how do you propose we should do this? I understood based on
> discussions from linux-omap that this is a common way.

actually this looks like a RFKILL hard switch to me. Why don't we just
integrate it with RFKILL and this way have a common interface to handle
all of these.

Regards

Marcel



  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-13 19:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-11  2:02 [PATCH/RFC 0/7] wl12xx SDIO interface Bob Copeland
2009-06-11  2:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/7] wl12xx: separate bus i/o code into io.c Bob Copeland
2009-06-11  2:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/7] wl12xx: use wiphy_dev instead of wl->spi->dev Bob Copeland
2009-06-11  2:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/7] wl12xx: introduce wl12xx_if_operations struct Bob Copeland
2009-06-11  2:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/7] wl12xx: make wl12xx_set_partition bus agnostic Bob Copeland
2009-06-11  2:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 5/7] wl12xx: move module probe methods into spi.c Bob Copeland
2009-06-11  2:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 6/7] wl12xx: split spi interface into separate module Bob Copeland
2009-06-11  2:03 ` [PATCH/RFC 7/7] wl12xx: add sdio support Bob Copeland
2009-06-13 11:21   ` Pierre Ossman
2009-06-13 16:00     ` Kalle Valo
2009-06-13 19:41       ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2009-06-13 20:13         ` Kalle Valo
2009-06-13 20:24           ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-06-13 20:44             ` Kalle Valo
2009-06-13 20:09       ` Pierre Ossman
2009-06-13 20:57         ` Bob Copeland
2009-06-18  2:25           ` Bob Copeland
2009-06-19 19:24             ` Pierre Ossman
2009-06-19 20:31               ` Bob Copeland
2009-06-20  4:29                 ` Kalle Valo
2009-06-21 18:38                 ` Pierre Ossman
2009-06-22  0:05                   ` Bob Copeland
2009-06-22  6:09                     ` Pierre Ossman
2009-06-22  6:14                       ` Pierre Ossman
2009-06-23  2:18                         ` Bob Copeland
2009-07-15  7:12             ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2009-07-15 12:08               ` Bob Copeland
2009-06-11 14:38 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/7] wl12xx SDIO interface Gábor Stefanik
2009-06-11 14:54   ` Florian Fainelli
2009-06-11 17:06     ` Bob Copeland
2009-06-11 14:55   ` Samuel Ortiz
2009-06-11 14:59     ` Florian Fainelli
2009-06-11 15:04       ` Gábor Stefanik
2009-06-11 15:08         ` Florian Fainelli
2009-06-11 15:03     ` Samuel Ortiz
2009-06-11 15:54 ` Kalle Valo
2009-06-11 17:08   ` Bob Copeland
2009-06-11 17:14     ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1244922097.1852.4.camel@violet \
    --to=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=kalle.valo@iki.fi \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=me@bobcopeland.com \
    --cc=pierre@ossman.eu \
    --cc=san@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox