public inbox for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
To: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@bencohen.org>
Cc: Pierre Ossman <pierre@ossman.eu>, Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@iki.fi>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, san@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 7/7] wl12xx: add sdio support
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:08:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090715120814.GC29682@hash.localnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bd5b16740907150012j7a687dddr5caee38e26bd9868@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:12:59AM +0300, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> Hi Bob, Pierre,
> 
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com> wrote:
> > +#define SDIO_VENDOR_ID_TI ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?0x104c
> > +#define SDIO_DEVICE_ID_TI_WL1251 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 0x9066
> 
> I wonder how those values are derived ?
> 
> Are they officially registered anywhere ?

This is what the card reports, also you can find it in the TI
vendor drivers.  I don't know who the registrar is, but as I
understand, the vendor ID is the same as the PCMCIA vendor ID,
so it's whoever assigns those.  I'm sure 0x9066 is defined by
TI.

-- 
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com


  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-15 12:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-11  2:02 [PATCH/RFC 0/7] wl12xx SDIO interface Bob Copeland
2009-06-11  2:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/7] wl12xx: separate bus i/o code into io.c Bob Copeland
2009-06-11  2:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/7] wl12xx: use wiphy_dev instead of wl->spi->dev Bob Copeland
2009-06-11  2:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/7] wl12xx: introduce wl12xx_if_operations struct Bob Copeland
2009-06-11  2:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/7] wl12xx: make wl12xx_set_partition bus agnostic Bob Copeland
2009-06-11  2:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 5/7] wl12xx: move module probe methods into spi.c Bob Copeland
2009-06-11  2:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 6/7] wl12xx: split spi interface into separate module Bob Copeland
2009-06-11  2:03 ` [PATCH/RFC 7/7] wl12xx: add sdio support Bob Copeland
2009-06-13 11:21   ` Pierre Ossman
2009-06-13 16:00     ` Kalle Valo
2009-06-13 19:41       ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-06-13 20:13         ` Kalle Valo
2009-06-13 20:24           ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-06-13 20:44             ` Kalle Valo
2009-06-13 20:09       ` Pierre Ossman
2009-06-13 20:57         ` Bob Copeland
2009-06-18  2:25           ` Bob Copeland
2009-06-19 19:24             ` Pierre Ossman
2009-06-19 20:31               ` Bob Copeland
2009-06-20  4:29                 ` Kalle Valo
2009-06-21 18:38                 ` Pierre Ossman
2009-06-22  0:05                   ` Bob Copeland
2009-06-22  6:09                     ` Pierre Ossman
2009-06-22  6:14                       ` Pierre Ossman
2009-06-23  2:18                         ` Bob Copeland
2009-07-15  7:12             ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2009-07-15 12:08               ` Bob Copeland [this message]
2009-06-11 14:38 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/7] wl12xx SDIO interface Gábor Stefanik
2009-06-11 14:54   ` Florian Fainelli
2009-06-11 17:06     ` Bob Copeland
2009-06-11 14:55   ` Samuel Ortiz
2009-06-11 14:59     ` Florian Fainelli
2009-06-11 15:04       ` Gábor Stefanik
2009-06-11 15:08         ` Florian Fainelli
2009-06-11 15:03     ` Samuel Ortiz
2009-06-11 15:54 ` Kalle Valo
2009-06-11 17:08   ` Bob Copeland
2009-06-11 17:14     ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090715120814.GC29682@hash.localnet \
    --to=me@bobcopeland.com \
    --cc=kalle.valo@iki.fi \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ohad@bencohen.org \
    --cc=pierre@ossman.eu \
    --cc=san@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox