From: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
To: Pierre Ossman <pierre@ossman.eu>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@iki.fi>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, san@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 7/7] wl12xx: add sdio support
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 16:57:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090613205737.GA30439@hash.localnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090613220908.271865cd@mjolnir.ossman.eu>
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 10:09:08PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 19:00:41 +0300
> Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@iki.fi> wrote:
>
> That doesn't make sense. If the card doesn't have power then there will
> be no device and no interface to bring up.
For SPI, you would register the platform driver with the SPI subsystem,
which gives you the ability to call the set_power callback at any time.
There's not a problem starting the driver if there is no device (as I
understand it, SPI is so simple there's no way to probe the bus anyway).
It would be nice to allow the SDIO driver to similarly invoke the
platform->set_power() callback at interface up/down time (that's why
there's wl12xx_sdio_set_power() which does nothing right now). However,
then the device will disappear from the bus...
> + wifi_ctrl->set_power(1); /* Power On */
Except for the problems outlined above, this would be invoked from
wl12xx_sdio_set_power(). But without it being up at start, probe()
won't work anyway. So it sounds like wl12xx_sdio_set_power() will
have to be a no-op for sdio devices unless there's some register
we can poke on the chip to put it to sleep.
> I think this should be somewhere under arch/ in the board setup code,
> where currently you have some code adding the "msm_wifi" platform
> device.
Yeah, in fact I tried that a while ago but something didn't work right,
some ordering issue perhaps. I'll try again.
--
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-13 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-11 2:02 [PATCH/RFC 0/7] wl12xx SDIO interface Bob Copeland
2009-06-11 2:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/7] wl12xx: separate bus i/o code into io.c Bob Copeland
2009-06-11 2:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/7] wl12xx: use wiphy_dev instead of wl->spi->dev Bob Copeland
2009-06-11 2:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/7] wl12xx: introduce wl12xx_if_operations struct Bob Copeland
2009-06-11 2:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/7] wl12xx: make wl12xx_set_partition bus agnostic Bob Copeland
2009-06-11 2:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 5/7] wl12xx: move module probe methods into spi.c Bob Copeland
2009-06-11 2:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 6/7] wl12xx: split spi interface into separate module Bob Copeland
2009-06-11 2:03 ` [PATCH/RFC 7/7] wl12xx: add sdio support Bob Copeland
2009-06-13 11:21 ` Pierre Ossman
2009-06-13 16:00 ` Kalle Valo
2009-06-13 19:41 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-06-13 20:13 ` Kalle Valo
2009-06-13 20:24 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-06-13 20:44 ` Kalle Valo
2009-06-13 20:09 ` Pierre Ossman
2009-06-13 20:57 ` Bob Copeland [this message]
2009-06-18 2:25 ` Bob Copeland
2009-06-19 19:24 ` Pierre Ossman
2009-06-19 20:31 ` Bob Copeland
2009-06-20 4:29 ` Kalle Valo
2009-06-21 18:38 ` Pierre Ossman
2009-06-22 0:05 ` Bob Copeland
2009-06-22 6:09 ` Pierre Ossman
2009-06-22 6:14 ` Pierre Ossman
2009-06-23 2:18 ` Bob Copeland
2009-07-15 7:12 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2009-07-15 12:08 ` Bob Copeland
2009-06-11 14:38 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/7] wl12xx SDIO interface Gábor Stefanik
2009-06-11 14:54 ` Florian Fainelli
2009-06-11 17:06 ` Bob Copeland
2009-06-11 14:55 ` Samuel Ortiz
2009-06-11 14:59 ` Florian Fainelli
2009-06-11 15:04 ` Gábor Stefanik
2009-06-11 15:08 ` Florian Fainelli
2009-06-11 15:03 ` Samuel Ortiz
2009-06-11 15:54 ` Kalle Valo
2009-06-11 17:08 ` Bob Copeland
2009-06-11 17:14 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090613205737.GA30439@hash.localnet \
--to=me@bobcopeland.com \
--cc=kalle.valo@iki.fi \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pierre@ossman.eu \
--cc=san@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox