[PATCH rtw-next 12/15] wifi: rtw89: coex: use the right switch-type enum on RTL8922D

[Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>]

From: Ching-Te Ku <ku920601@realtek.com>

Two unrelated enumerations describe a BT antenna switch type. The one
the RTL8922D antenna configuration uses numbers the absent switch as
zero and the internal switch as one, while the older one numbers the
internal switch as zero. The shared 2-antenna case picked the internal
value from the older enumeration, so it stored zero and claimed no
switch at all.

A BT whose switch type says there is no switch is treated as not sharing
an antenna with the WL RF-path that the other RF-path shares with it,
which drops the cross-talk entry for that path. Store the value from the
enumeration this field is read with. The 1-antenna and 3-antenna cases
in the same function already do.

Signed-off-by: Ching-Te Ku <ku920601@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8922d.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8922d.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8922d.c
index 7ac15a5d949a..271a92123158 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8922d.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8922d.c
@@ -3305,7 +3305,7 @@ static void rtw8922d_btc_set_rfe(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
 		if (is_bt_share) { /* WL-S0 + (WL-S1 & BT0-S1) */
 			md->ant.type = BTC_ANT_SHARED;
 			md->bt0_pos = BTC_BT_BTG;
-			md->bt0_sw_type = BTC_SWITCH_INTERNAL;
+			md->bt0_sw_type = BTC_SWITCH_V1_INTERNAL;
 			dm->ant_xmap[BTC_RF_S1][BTC_BT_1ST] = 1;
 		} else { /* WL-S0 + BT0-S1 */
 			md->ant.type = BTC_ANT_DEDICATED;
-- 
2.25.1