* [PATCH] wifi: ath12k: use correct flag field for 320 MHz
@ 2024-03-14 20:46 Aloka Dixit
2024-03-14 21:24 ` Jeff Johnson
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Aloka Dixit @ 2024-03-14 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ath12k, linux-wireless; +Cc: Aloka Dixit
WMI_PEER_EXT_320MHZ (0x2) is defined as an extended flag, replace
peer_flags by peer_flags_ext while sending peer data.
Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.0.1-00029-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
Fixes: 6734cf9b4cc7 ("wifi: ath12k: peer assoc for 320 MHz")
Signed-off-by: Aloka Dixit <quic_alokad@quicinc.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/wmi.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/wmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/wmi.c
index 9d69a1769926..34de3d16efc0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/wmi.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/wmi.c
@@ -1900,7 +1900,7 @@ static void ath12k_wmi_copy_peer_flags(struct wmi_peer_assoc_complete_cmd *cmd,
if (arg->bw_160)
cmd->peer_flags |= cpu_to_le32(WMI_PEER_160MHZ);
if (arg->bw_320)
- cmd->peer_flags |= cpu_to_le32(WMI_PEER_EXT_320MHZ);
+ cmd->peer_flags_ext |= cpu_to_le32(WMI_PEER_EXT_320MHZ);
/* Typically if STBC is enabled for VHT it should be enabled
* for HT as well
base-commit: a2a4cf3541db8066af7e6d4eb6e9e6445f6d9658
--
2.39.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath12k: use correct flag field for 320 MHz
2024-03-14 20:46 [PATCH] wifi: ath12k: use correct flag field for 320 MHz Aloka Dixit
@ 2024-03-14 21:24 ` Jeff Johnson
2024-03-18 15:51 ` Kalle Valo
2024-03-20 10:10 ` Kalle Valo
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Johnson @ 2024-03-14 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aloka Dixit, ath12k, linux-wireless
On 3/14/2024 1:46 PM, Aloka Dixit wrote:
> WMI_PEER_EXT_320MHZ (0x2) is defined as an extended flag, replace
> peer_flags by peer_flags_ext while sending peer data.
>
> Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.0.1-00029-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
>
> Fixes: 6734cf9b4cc7 ("wifi: ath12k: peer assoc for 320 MHz")
> Signed-off-by: Aloka Dixit <quic_alokad@quicinc.com>
Acked-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath12k: use correct flag field for 320 MHz
2024-03-14 20:46 [PATCH] wifi: ath12k: use correct flag field for 320 MHz Aloka Dixit
2024-03-14 21:24 ` Jeff Johnson
@ 2024-03-18 15:51 ` Kalle Valo
2024-03-18 17:54 ` Kalle Valo
2024-03-20 10:10 ` Kalle Valo
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2024-03-18 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aloka Dixit; +Cc: ath12k, linux-wireless
Aloka Dixit <quic_alokad@quicinc.com> writes:
> WMI_PEER_EXT_320MHZ (0x2) is defined as an extended flag, replace
> peer_flags by peer_flags_ext while sending peer data.
>
> Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.0.1-00029-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
>
> Fixes: 6734cf9b4cc7 ("wifi: ath12k: peer assoc for 320 MHz")
> Signed-off-by: Aloka Dixit <quic_alokad@quicinc.com>
What does this fix from user's point of view? Does it mean that 320 MHz
chanels were broken before and this commit fixes that? I can ammend the
commit message.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath12k: use correct flag field for 320 MHz
2024-03-18 15:51 ` Kalle Valo
@ 2024-03-18 17:54 ` Kalle Valo
2024-03-18 18:40 ` Aloka Dixit
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2024-03-18 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aloka Dixit; +Cc: ath12k, linux-wireless
Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> writes:
> Aloka Dixit <quic_alokad@quicinc.com> writes:
>
>> WMI_PEER_EXT_320MHZ (0x2) is defined as an extended flag, replace
>> peer_flags by peer_flags_ext while sending peer data.
>>
>> Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.0.1-00029-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
>>
>> Fixes: 6734cf9b4cc7 ("wifi: ath12k: peer assoc for 320 MHz")
>> Signed-off-by: Aloka Dixit <quic_alokad@quicinc.com>
>
> What does this fix from user's point of view? Does it mean that 320 MHz
> chanels were broken before and this commit fixes that? I can ammend the
> commit message.
And what about WCN7850? Does it work the same?
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath12k: use correct flag field for 320 MHz
2024-03-18 17:54 ` Kalle Valo
@ 2024-03-18 18:40 ` Aloka Dixit
2024-03-18 18:49 ` Kalle Valo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Aloka Dixit @ 2024-03-18 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kalle Valo; +Cc: ath12k, linux-wireless
On 3/18/2024 10:54 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> writes:
>
>> Aloka Dixit <quic_alokad@quicinc.com> writes:
>>
>>> WMI_PEER_EXT_320MHZ (0x2) is defined as an extended flag, replace
>>> peer_flags by peer_flags_ext while sending peer data.
>>>
>>> Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.0.1-00029-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
>>>
>>> Fixes: 6734cf9b4cc7 ("wifi: ath12k: peer assoc for 320 MHz")
>>> Signed-off-by: Aloka Dixit <quic_alokad@quicinc.com>
>>
>> What does this fix from user's point of view? Does it mean that 320 MHz
>> chanels were broken before and this commit fixes that? I can ammend the
>> commit message.
>
> And what about WCN7850? Does it work the same?
>
Hi Kalle,
320 MHz association was broken. It was a re-basing error while sending
the original patch because the correct field was added during testing,
still used that way internally too. I have not tested WCN7850 on this
patch but yes will require the same field. Current code was setting QOS
bit instead of 320MHz.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath12k: use correct flag field for 320 MHz
2024-03-18 18:40 ` Aloka Dixit
@ 2024-03-18 18:49 ` Kalle Valo
2024-03-18 19:24 ` Aloka Dixit
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2024-03-18 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aloka Dixit; +Cc: ath12k, linux-wireless
Aloka Dixit <quic_alokad@quicinc.com> writes:
> On 3/18/2024 10:54 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> writes:
>>
>>> Aloka Dixit <quic_alokad@quicinc.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> WMI_PEER_EXT_320MHZ (0x2) is defined as an extended flag, replace
>>>> peer_flags by peer_flags_ext while sending peer data.
>>>>
>>>> Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.0.1-00029-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 6734cf9b4cc7 ("wifi: ath12k: peer assoc for 320 MHz")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Aloka Dixit <quic_alokad@quicinc.com>
>>>
>>> What does this fix from user's point of view? Does it mean that 320 MHz
>>> chanels were broken before and this commit fixes that? I can ammend the
>>> commit message.
>> And what about WCN7850? Does it work the same?
>
> 320 MHz association was broken. It was a re-basing error while sending
> the original patch because the correct field was added during testing,
> still used that way internally too. I have not tested WCN7850 on this
> patch but yes will require the same field. Current code was setting
> QOS bit instead of 320MHz.
Thanks, does this look ok:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=pending&id=c4ade6bdf3d1a2d9d05606a85431f154559d5a80
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath12k: use correct flag field for 320 MHz
2024-03-18 18:49 ` Kalle Valo
@ 2024-03-18 19:24 ` Aloka Dixit
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Aloka Dixit @ 2024-03-18 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kalle Valo; +Cc: ath12k, linux-wireless
On 3/18/2024 11:49 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Aloka Dixit <quic_alokad@quicinc.com> writes:
>
>> On 3/18/2024 10:54 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>> Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> Aloka Dixit <quic_alokad@quicinc.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> WMI_PEER_EXT_320MHZ (0x2) is defined as an extended flag, replace
>>>>> peer_flags by peer_flags_ext while sending peer data.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.0.1-00029-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 6734cf9b4cc7 ("wifi: ath12k: peer assoc for 320 MHz")
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Aloka Dixit <quic_alokad@quicinc.com>
>>>>
>>>> What does this fix from user's point of view? Does it mean that 320 MHz
>>>> chanels were broken before and this commit fixes that? I can ammend the
>>>> commit message.
>>> And what about WCN7850? Does it work the same?
>>
>> 320 MHz association was broken. It was a re-basing error while sending
>> the original patch because the correct field was added during testing,
>> still used that way internally too. I have not tested WCN7850 on this
>> patch but yes will require the same field. Current code was setting
>> QOS bit instead of 320MHz.
>
> Thanks, does this look ok:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=pending&id=c4ade6bdf3d1a2d9d05606a85431f154559d5a80
>
Perfect, thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath12k: use correct flag field for 320 MHz
2024-03-14 20:46 [PATCH] wifi: ath12k: use correct flag field for 320 MHz Aloka Dixit
2024-03-14 21:24 ` Jeff Johnson
2024-03-18 15:51 ` Kalle Valo
@ 2024-03-20 10:10 ` Kalle Valo
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2024-03-20 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aloka Dixit; +Cc: ath12k, linux-wireless, Aloka Dixit
Aloka Dixit <quic_alokad@quicinc.com> wrote:
> Due to an error during rebasing the patchset 320 MHz channel support got
> broken. ath12k was setting the QoS bit instead of the correct flag.
> WMI_PEER_EXT_320MHZ (0x2) is defined as an extended flag, replace
> peer_flags by peer_flags_ext while sending peer data.
>
> This affected both QCN9274 and WCN7850 which use the same flag.
>
> Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.0.1-00029-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
>
> Fixes: 6734cf9b4cc7 ("wifi: ath12k: peer assoc for 320 MHz")
> Signed-off-by: Aloka Dixit <quic_alokad@quicinc.com>
> Acked-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <quic_kvalo@quicinc.com>
Patch applied to ath-next branch of ath.git, thanks.
020e08ae5e68 wifi: ath12k: use correct flag field for 320 MHz channels
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20240314204651.11075-1-quic_alokad@quicinc.com/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-03-20 10:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-03-14 20:46 [PATCH] wifi: ath12k: use correct flag field for 320 MHz Aloka Dixit
2024-03-14 21:24 ` Jeff Johnson
2024-03-18 15:51 ` Kalle Valo
2024-03-18 17:54 ` Kalle Valo
2024-03-18 18:40 ` Aloka Dixit
2024-03-18 18:49 ` Kalle Valo
2024-03-18 19:24 ` Aloka Dixit
2024-03-20 10:10 ` Kalle Valo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox