From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 6.7.0-rc1 + hacks deadlock bug, wifi netdev delete + cat of debugfs file.
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:04:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <91f66433-7eb9-4916-953e-6587f9ff5944@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6abad7701a110116a49e54f908a9ab9422a8e6ad.camel@sipsolutions.net>
On 11/8/23 10:43, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-11-08 at 09:44 -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
>>
>> This method appears to actually set a S_DEAD flag in the dentry,
>>
>
> A *dir* entry.
>
>> so maybe
>> we just check that flag in the mutex_trylock failed to acquire path
>> in the debugfs read?
>>
>> void simple_recursive_removal(struct dentry *dentry,
>> void (*callback)(struct dentry *))
>> {
>> struct dentry *this = dget(dentry);
>> while (true) {
>> struct dentry *victim = NULL, *child;
>> struct inode *inode = this->d_inode;
>>
>> inode_lock(inode);
>> if (d_is_dir(this))
>> inode->i_flags |= S_DEAD;
>>
>
> But even if you did that, I'm not sure what you'd do? trylock and sleep,
> and abort if you find it's being removed? That all sounds super awkward.
Here is my compile-only tested approach. It only tries to fix one particular
locking case in debugfs, so I'm sure it is not yet complete. I believe I
need to add that new flag in the fs.h, as S_DEAD is only for directories,
if I understand the code properly.
diff --git a/fs/libfs.c b/fs/libfs.c
index abe2b5a40ba1..5b420e019ad4 100644
--- a/fs/libfs.c
+++ b/fs/libfs.c
@@ -520,6 +520,7 @@ void simple_recursive_removal(struct dentry *dentry,
inode_lock(inode);
if (d_is_dir(this))
inode->i_flags |= S_DEAD;
+ inode->i_flags |= S_GOING_AWAY;
while ((child = find_next_child(this, victim)) == NULL) {
// kill and ascend
// update metadata while it's still locked
@@ -530,6 +531,7 @@ void simple_recursive_removal(struct dentry *dentry,
this = this->d_parent;
inode = this->d_inode;
inode_lock(inode);
+ inode->i_flags |= S_GOING_AWAY;
if (simple_positive(victim)) {
d_invalidate(victim); // avoid lost mounts
if (d_is_dir(victim))
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 98b7a7a8c42e..b76eafe31427 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -2116,6 +2116,7 @@ struct super_operations {
#define S_CASEFOLD (1 << 15) /* Casefolded file */
#define S_VERITY (1 << 16) /* Verity file (using fs/verity/) */
#define S_KERNEL_FILE (1 << 17) /* File is in use by the kernel (eg. fs/cachefiles) */
+#define S_GOING_AWAY (1 << 18) /* dentry is trying to be deleted */
/*
* Note that nosuid etc flags are inode-specific: setting some file-system
@@ -2163,6 +2164,7 @@ static inline bool sb_rdonly(const struct super_block *sb) { return sb->s_flags
#define IS_ENCRYPTED(inode) ((inode)->i_flags & S_ENCRYPTED)
#define IS_CASEFOLDED(inode) ((inode)->i_flags & S_CASEFOLD)
#define IS_VERITY(inode) ((inode)->i_flags & S_VERITY)
+#define IS_INODE_GOINGAWAY(inode) ((inode)->i_flags & S_GOING_AWAY)
#define IS_WHITEOUT(inode) (S_ISCHR(inode->i_mode) && \
(inode)->i_rdev == WHITEOUT_DEV)
diff --git a/include/net/cfg80211.h b/include/net/cfg80211.h
index 34fbefad7652..b4f3bf1c6b19 100644
--- a/include/net/cfg80211.h
+++ b/include/net/cfg80211.h
@@ -5881,6 +5881,33 @@ static inline void wiphy_lock(struct wiphy *wiphy)
__acquire(&wiphy->mtx);
}
+/**
+ * wiphy_trylock - try to lock the wiphy
+ * @wiphy: the wiphy to lock
+ *
+ * This is needed around registering and unregistering netdevs that
+ * aren't created through cfg80211 calls, since that requires locking
+ * in cfg80211 when the notifiers is called, but that cannot
+ * differentiate which way it's called.
+ *
+ * It can also be used by drivers for their own purposes.
+ *
+ * When cfg80211 ops are called, the wiphy is already locked.
+ *
+ * Note that this makes sure that no workers that have been queued
+ * with wiphy_queue_work() are running.
+ *
+ * Returns 0 if lock failed, non-zero otherwise.
+ */
+static inline int wiphy_trylock(struct wiphy *wiphy)
+ __acquires(&wiphy->mtx)
+{
+ int rv = mutex_trylock(&wiphy->mtx);
+ if (rv)
+ __acquire(&wiphy->mtx);
+ return rv;
+}
+
/**
* wiphy_unlock - unlock the wiphy again
* @wiphy: the wiphy to unlock
diff --git a/net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c b/net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c
index ec91e131b29e..c22697969973 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c
@@ -23,15 +23,31 @@
#include "driver-ops.h"
static ssize_t ieee80211_if_read_sdata(
+ struct file* file,
struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
char __user *userbuf,
size_t count, loff_t *ppos,
ssize_t (*format)(const struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata, char *, int))
{
- char buf[200];
ssize_t ret = -EINVAL;
-
- wiphy_lock(sdata->local->hw.wiphy);
+ struct inode* f_inode;
+ char buf[200];
+ int rv;
+
+ while (true) {
+ rv = wiphy_trylock(sdata->local->hw.wiphy);
+ if (rv) {
+ break; /* we have the lock */
+ } else {
+ /* failed to lock, see if we are being deleted. */
+ f_inode = file_inode(file);
+ if (IS_INODE_GOINGAWAY(f_inode) || IS_DEADDIR(f_inode)) {
+ return -ESTALE;
+ }
+ /* Sleep for a bit so we don't busy-spin too hard on try-lock */
+ msleep(1);
+ }
+ }
ret = (*format)(sdata, buf, sizeof(buf));
wiphy_unlock(sdata->local->hw.wiphy);
@@ -173,7 +189,7 @@ static ssize_t ieee80211_if_read_##name(struct file *file, \
char __user *userbuf, \
size_t count, loff_t *ppos) \
{ \
- return ieee80211_if_read_sdata(file->private_data, \
+ return ieee80211_if_read_sdata(file, file->private_data, \
userbuf, count, ppos, \
ieee80211_if_fmt_##name); \
}
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-08 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-07 22:08 6.7.0-rc1 + hacks deadlock bug, wifi netdev delete + cat of debugfs file Ben Greear
2023-11-08 10:31 ` Johannes Berg
2023-11-08 15:07 ` Ben Greear
2023-11-08 15:44 ` Johannes Berg
2023-11-08 15:55 ` Ben Greear
2023-11-08 16:07 ` Johannes Berg
2023-11-08 17:39 ` Benjamin Berg
2023-11-08 17:46 ` Ben Greear
2023-11-08 17:44 ` Ben Greear
2023-11-08 18:43 ` Johannes Berg
2023-11-08 20:04 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2023-11-08 20:06 ` Johannes Berg
2023-11-08 16:21 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=91f66433-7eb9-4916-953e-6587f9ff5944@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicstange@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox