From: Vitaly Bordug <vbordug@ru.mvista.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CPM_UART: Fix non-console initialisation (v2)
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 21:45:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061113214536.3f014ad6@vitb.ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17752.16589.182362.143760@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:54:21 +1100
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> wrote:
> Vitaly Bordug writes:
>
> > patch with proper description inlined.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Vitaly
> > ---
> > [POWERPC] CPM_UART: Fixes inconsistency of function definition
> >
> > From: Kalle Pokki <kalle.pokki@iki.fi>
> >
> > The below hunk was missed from the recent patch, and now, there are somewhat
> > inconsistent definitions:
>
> Well, what I want to know is this: why was the addition of __init
> bundled in with what I was told was a bug-fix that was needed for
> 2.6.19? Does the addition of __init fix a bug somehow?
>
>
That wasn't for .19 - I assumed your comment as -ENO_PROPER_DESCRIPTION.
The issue is small but shouldn't be put aside.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-13 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-01 13:08 [PATCH] CPM_UART: Fix non-console initialisation (v2) Kalle Pokki
2006-11-01 13:47 ` Vitaly Bordug
2006-11-10 10:29 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-11-10 11:45 ` Kalle Pokki
2006-11-10 12:02 ` Kalle Pokki
2006-11-11 11:29 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-11-11 14:15 ` Kalle Pokki
2006-11-13 8:22 ` Vitaly Bordug
2006-11-13 9:54 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-11-13 11:01 ` Kalle Pokki
2006-11-13 18:45 ` Vitaly Bordug [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061113214536.3f014ad6@vitb.ru.mvista.com \
--to=vbordug@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox