public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] 85xx: Add basic Uniprocessor MPC8572 DS port
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:37:49 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070912033749.GE20218@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0F762D4F-C84B-4979-92D4-42C5D40AE455@kernel.crashing.org>

On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:35:01PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> 
> On Sep 11, 2007, at 10:00 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:59:22PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sep 11, 2007, at 12:48 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> >>
> >>> Olof Johansson wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:21:30PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >>>>> Olof Johansson wrote:
> >>>>>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:00:28AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >>>>>>> well the ifdefs are orthogonal.  We don't have a way of knowing
> >>>>>>> primary from the device tree today.
> >>>>>> How about something like "fsl,primary-phb" in the bus device
> >>>>>> node? I don't
> >>>>>> know, maybe it's already been discussed and turned down for some
> >>>>>> reason.
> >>>>> It's more of a Linux issue than anything to do with the hardware.
> >>>>
> >>>> That doesn't stop firmware from telling linux which bus is the
> >>>> primary
> >>>> one on the system to help out.
> >>>
> >>> The entire notion of a "primary" PCI bus is due to a Linux flaw.
> >>>
> >>> If we did put it in the device tree, it should be something like
> >>> "linux,primary-phb".  But since Linux can tell from the node's
> >>> children,
> >>> there doesn't seem to be much point.
> >>
> >> Once someone rights code to do this I'm happy to change over.  I took
> >> this model of explicitly knowing the primary PHB from the pmac code.
> >
> > In the meantime, couldn't the code still be merged, using an explicit
> > test of the root node's 'compatible' or 'model' properties to decide
> > on the right primary bus.
> 
> I will be, I'm not going to wait on having some device tree spec for  
> this.  The board code can handle it until we come to some agreement  
> on how to do this.  I'm in agreement with Scott in that code should  
> be added to scan or allow explicit determination.  Adding a 'prop' to  
> the device tree just for linux seems a bit silly.

Yes, saw that in your new version after I'd posted that.  Sorry.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-12  3:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-11  6:29 [PATCH] [POWERPC] 85xx: Add basic Uniprocessor MPC8572 DS port Kumar Gala
2007-09-11 14:17 ` Scott Wood
2007-09-11 15:58   ` Kumar Gala
2007-09-12 13:20     ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-09-13  3:27       ` Kumar Gala
2007-09-13 16:53         ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-09-13 21:23           ` Kumar Gala
2007-09-11 14:18 ` Olof Johansson
2007-09-11 15:50   ` Kumar Gala
2007-09-11 15:55     ` Olof Johansson
2007-09-11 16:00       ` Kumar Gala
2007-09-11 17:15         ` Olof Johansson
2007-09-11 17:21           ` Scott Wood
2007-09-11 17:33             ` Olof Johansson
2007-09-11 17:48               ` Scott Wood
2007-09-11 17:59                 ` Kumar Gala
2007-09-12  3:00                   ` David Gibson
2007-09-12  3:35                     ` Kumar Gala
2007-09-12  3:37                       ` David Gibson [this message]
2007-09-12  3:37                       ` Olof Johansson
2007-09-12 13:20             ` Segher Boessenkool

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070912033749.GE20218@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox