From: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] 85xx: Add basic Uniprocessor MPC8572 DS port
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 10:50:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <230A7A2A-3184-4BC2-B8AC-C94090B532B0@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070911141821.GA32545@lixom.net>
On Sep 11, 2007, at 9:18 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 01:29:18AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Added basic board port for MPC8572 DS reference platform that is
>> similiar to the MPC8544/33 DS reference platform in uniprocessor
>> mode.
>>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ds.c b/arch/
>> powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ds.c
>> index 3a5c3c4..1e2eba8 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ds.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ds.c
>> @@ -181,6 +181,23 @@ static int __init mpc8544_ds_probe(void)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Called very early, device-tree isn't unflattened
>> + */
>> +static int __init mpc8572_ds_probe(void)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long root = of_get_flat_dt_root();
>> +
>> + if (of_flat_dt_is_compatible(root, "MPC8572DS")) {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
>> + primary_phb_addr = 0x8000;
>> +#endif
>> + return 1;
>> + } else {
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> define_machine(mpc8544_ds) {
>> .name = "MPC8544 DS",
>> .probe = mpc8544_ds_probe,
>> @@ -194,3 +211,17 @@ define_machine(mpc8544_ds) {
>> .calibrate_decr = generic_calibrate_decr,
>> .progress = udbg_progress,
>> };
>> +
>> +define_machine(mpc8572_ds) {
>> + .name = "MPC8572 DS",
>> + .probe = mpc8572_ds_probe,
>> + .setup_arch = mpc85xx_ds_setup_arch,
>> + .init_IRQ = mpc85xx_ds_pic_init,
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
>> + .pcibios_fixup_bus = fsl_pcibios_fixup_bus,
>> +#endif
>> + .get_irq = mpic_get_irq,
>> + .restart = mpc85xx_restart,
>> + .calibrate_decr = generic_calibrate_decr,
>> + .progress = udbg_progress,
>> +};
>
> How different are these boards really? Could you just detect MPC85xxDS
> and have a generic platform for them, or are they different enough
> that
> you need individual ones for it?
I wanted a different probe. I figured having a different struct was
a simple solution.
>
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pci_ids.h b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
>> index 06d23e1..c98b867 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pci_ids.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
>> @@ -374,10 +374,9 @@
>> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_IXP400_SATA 0x4379
>> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_IXP400_SATA2 0x437a
>> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_IXP600_SATA 0x4380
>> -#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_IXP600_SMBUS 0x4385
>> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_SBX00_SMBUS 0x4385
>> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_IXP600_IDE 0x438c
>> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_IXP700_SATA 0x4390
>> -#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_IXP700_SMBUS 0x4395
>> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_IXP700_IDE 0x439c
>
> This looks like it doesn't belong in this patch.
oops :) {copying from an different tree}
- k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-11 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-11 6:29 [PATCH] [POWERPC] 85xx: Add basic Uniprocessor MPC8572 DS port Kumar Gala
2007-09-11 14:17 ` Scott Wood
2007-09-11 15:58 ` Kumar Gala
2007-09-12 13:20 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-09-13 3:27 ` Kumar Gala
2007-09-13 16:53 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-09-13 21:23 ` Kumar Gala
2007-09-11 14:18 ` Olof Johansson
2007-09-11 15:50 ` Kumar Gala [this message]
2007-09-11 15:55 ` Olof Johansson
2007-09-11 16:00 ` Kumar Gala
2007-09-11 17:15 ` Olof Johansson
2007-09-11 17:21 ` Scott Wood
2007-09-11 17:33 ` Olof Johansson
2007-09-11 17:48 ` Scott Wood
2007-09-11 17:59 ` Kumar Gala
2007-09-12 3:00 ` David Gibson
2007-09-12 3:35 ` Kumar Gala
2007-09-12 3:37 ` David Gibson
2007-09-12 3:37 ` Olof Johansson
2007-09-12 13:20 ` Segher Boessenkool
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=230A7A2A-3184-4BC2-B8AC-C94090B532B0@kernel.crashing.org \
--to=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox