From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/17] mm/sparse-vmemmap: support section-based vmemmap optimization
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 15:19:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <017682fe-2e47-4fca-a812-368a7ea66320@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <178409212284.638342.13762174390974989494.b4-review@b4>
On 2026/7/15 13:08, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>> Teach sparse-vmemmap population code to use the compound page order
>> when deciding whether a vmemmap page can be optimized.
>>
>> With this information, the common sparse-vmemmap population path can
>> allocate or reuse shared tail vmemmap pages directly instead of relying
>> on HugeTLB/DAX-specific handling.
>>
>> This centralizes vmemmap optimization logic in the sparse-vmemmap code,
>> based on section metadata, and prepares for sharing the same mechanism
>> across different users of vmemmap optimization, including HugeTLB and
>> DAX.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> index 41a1ebbe5e85..41f6a584a52a 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> @@ -1148,7 +1148,7 @@ struct zone {
>> /* Zone statistics */
>> atomic_long_t vm_stat[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS];
>> atomic_long_t vm_numa_event[NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS];
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
>> struct page *vmemmap_tails[NR_OPTIMIZABLE_FOLIO_ORDERS];
>> #endif
>> } ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
>> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
>> index ebbab7421633..8ec8b447d75e 100644
>> --- a/mm/internal.h
>> +++ b/mm/internal.h
>> @@ -993,6 +993,9 @@ static inline void __section_mark_present(struct mem_section *ms,
>>
>> ms->section_mem_map |= SECTION_MARKED_PRESENT;
>> }
>> +
>> +int section_nr_vmemmap_pages(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>> + struct vmem_altmap *altmap, struct dev_pagemap *pgmap);
> What about !SPARSE_VMEMMAP case?
I need a stub here. Since I'm taking your last suggestion and not
moving this function out of sparse-vmemmap.c, I'll handle it in the
next version.
>
>> #else
>> static inline void sparse_init(void) {}
>> #endif /* CONFIG_SPARSEMEM */
>> diff --git a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
>> index 99f59394feab..232f2a08afad 100644
>> --- a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
>> +++ b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
>> @@ -146,17 +146,49 @@ void __meminit vmemmap_verify(pte_t *pte, int node,
>> start, end - 1);
>> }
>>
>> +static struct zone __meminit *pfn_to_zone(unsigned long pfn, int nid)
>> +{
>> + pg_data_t *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
>> +
>> + for (enum zone_type zone_type = 0; zone_type < MAX_NR_ZONES; zone_type++) {
>> + struct zone *zone = &pgdat->node_zones[zone_type];
>> +
>> + if (zone_spans_pfn(zone, pfn))
>> + return zone;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static __meminit struct page *vmemmap_get_tail(unsigned int order, struct zone *zone);
>> +
> Maybe just move the entire function here?
No problem.
>
>> static pte_t * __meminit vmemmap_pte_populate(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, int node,
>> struct vmem_altmap *altmap,
>> unsigned long ptpfn, unsigned long flags)
>> {
>> pte_t *pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, addr);
>> + struct page *page = (struct page *)addr;
>> + unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
>> + unsigned int order = section_order(__pfn_to_section(pfn));
>> +
>> if (pte_none(ptep_get(pte))) {
>> pte_t entry;
>> - void *p;
>> +
>> + if (page_vmemmap_optimizable(page, order) &&
>> + ptpfn == (unsigned long)-1) {
>> + struct zone *zone = pfn_to_zone(pfn, node);
>> +
>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!zone))
>> + return NULL;
>> + page = vmemmap_get_tail(order, zone);
>> + if (!page)
>> + return NULL;
>> + ptpfn = page_to_pfn(page);
>> + }
>>
>> if (ptpfn == (unsigned long)-1) {
>> - p = vmemmap_alloc_block_buf(PAGE_SIZE, node, altmap);
>> + void *p = vmemmap_alloc_block_buf(PAGE_SIZE, node, altmap);
>> +
>> if (!p)
>> return NULL;
>> ptpfn = PHYS_PFN(__pa(p));
>> @@ -175,7 +207,8 @@ static pte_t * __meminit vmemmap_pte_populate(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, in
>> }
>> entry = pfn_pte(ptpfn, PAGE_KERNEL);
>> set_pte_at(&init_mm, addr, pte, entry);
>> - }
>> + } else if (WARN_ON_ONCE(page_vmemmap_optimizable(page, order)))
>> + return NULL;
>> return pte;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -320,7 +353,6 @@ void vmemmap_wrprotect_hvo(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP
>> static __meminit struct page *vmemmap_get_tail(unsigned int order, struct zone *zone)
>> {
>> struct page *p, *tail;
>> @@ -348,6 +380,7 @@ static __meminit struct page *vmemmap_get_tail(unsigned int order, struct zone *
>> return tail;
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP
>> int __meminit vmemmap_populate_hvo(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>> unsigned int order, struct zone *zone,
>> unsigned long headsize)
>> @@ -402,6 +435,9 @@ int __meminit vmemmap_populate_hugepages(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
>> pmd_t *pmd;
>>
>> for (addr = start; addr < end; addr = next) {
>> + unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn((struct page *)addr);
>> + struct mem_section *ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
>> +
>> next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
>>
>> pgd = vmemmap_pgd_populate(addr, node);
>> @@ -417,7 +453,7 @@ int __meminit vmemmap_populate_hugepages(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
>> - if (pmd_none(pmdp_get(pmd))) {
>> + if (pmd_none(pmdp_get(pmd)) && !section_vmemmap_optimizable(ms)) {
>> void *p;
>>
>> p = vmemmap_alloc_block_buf(PMD_SIZE, node, altmap);
>> @@ -435,8 +471,19 @@ int __meminit vmemmap_populate_hugepages(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
>> */
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> }
>> - } else if (vmemmap_check_pmd(pmd, node, addr, next))
>> + } else if (vmemmap_check_pmd(pmd, node, addr, next)) {
>> + const struct mem_section *start_ms;
>> + unsigned long align = max(1UL << section_order(ms), PAGES_PER_SECTION);
>> +
>> + /* HVO-covered sections must not use PMD mappings. */
>> + start_ms = __pfn_to_section(ALIGN_DOWN(pfn, align));
>> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(pfn, align) && section_vmemmap_optimizable(start_ms))
>> + return -ENOTSUPP;
>> +
>> + /* PMD mappings end HVO coverage for this section. */
>> + section_set_order(ms, 0);
> The whole pmd block here becomes really hairy.
> I'd suggest splitting it out to a helper function and reducing the
> amount of nested ifs with early returns where possible.
The code here is actually a bit too defensive. I plan to simplify
it significantly in the next version and will only reintroduce this
logic if it becomes necessary in the future.
>
>> continue;
>> + }
>> if (vmemmap_populate_basepages(addr, next, node, altmap))
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> }
>> @@ -642,36 +689,6 @@ void offline_mem_sections(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -static int __meminit section_nr_vmemmap_pages(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>> - struct vmem_altmap *altmap, struct dev_pagemap *pgmap)
>> -{
>> - const struct mem_section *ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
>> - const unsigned int order = pgmap ? pgmap->vmemmap_shift : section_order(ms);
>> - const unsigned long pages_per_compound = 1UL << order;
>> - unsigned int vmemmap_pages = OPTIMIZED_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_PAGES;
>> -
>> - VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(pfn | nr_pages, PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION));
>> - VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(nr_pages > PAGES_PER_SECTION);
>> -
>> - if (vmemmap_can_optimize(altmap, pgmap))
>> - vmemmap_pages = VMEMMAP_RESERVE_NR;
>> -
>> - if (!vmemmap_can_optimize(altmap, pgmap) && !section_vmemmap_optimizable(ms))
>> - return DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_pages * sizeof(struct page), PAGE_SIZE);
>> -
>> - if (order < PFN_SECTION_SHIFT) {
>> - VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(pfn | nr_pages, pages_per_compound));
>> - return vmemmap_pages * nr_pages / pages_per_compound;
>> - }
>> -
>> - VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(pfn | nr_pages, PAGES_PER_SECTION));
>> -
>> - if (IS_ALIGNED(pfn, pages_per_compound))
>> - return vmemmap_pages;
>> -
>> - return 0;
>> -}
>> -
>> static struct page * __meminit populate_section_memmap(unsigned long pfn,
>> unsigned long nr_pages, int nid, struct vmem_altmap *altmap,
>> struct dev_pagemap *pgmap)
>> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
>> index 9457a4d6a6fc..3e96478a63e0 100644
>> --- a/mm/sparse.c
>> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
>> @@ -284,6 +284,36 @@ static void __init sparse_usage_fini(void)
>> sparse_usagebuf = sparse_usagebuf_end = NULL;
>> }
>>
>> +int __meminit section_nr_vmemmap_pages(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>> + struct vmem_altmap *altmap, struct dev_pagemap *pgmap)
>> +{
> I don't think moving this to sparse.c is a good idea, let's keep vmemmap
> code in sparse-vmemmap.c
OK. To make things clearer, I'll likely add a "stub" to handle
cases involving non-SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP configurations.
Since this function is still being called by sparse.c, what do you
think about renaming it to section_nr_memmap_pages?
Muchun
Thanks.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-16 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-02 9:38 [PATCH 00/17] mm: Introduce section-based vmemmap optimization for HugeTLB Muchun Song
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 01/17] mm/sparse: drop power-of-2 size requirement for struct mem_section Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-15 9:34 ` David Laight
2026-07-15 13:15 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-15 15:52 ` David Laight
2026-07-16 6:51 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 02/17] mm/sparse-vmemmap: track compound page order in " Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-15 6:42 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-15 9:45 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-16 9:15 ` David Laight
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 03/17] mm/sparse-vmemmap: introduce folio-oriented vmemmap optimization macros Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-16 7:38 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-16 10:04 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 04/17] mm/mm_init: skip initializing shared vmemmap tail pages Muchun Song
2026-07-09 10:45 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-09 12:31 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-09 13:05 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-09 13:23 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-15 9:11 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-15 9:47 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 05/17] mm/sparse-vmemmap: initialize shared tail vmemmap pages on allocation Muchun Song
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 06/17] mm/sparse-vmemmap: support section-based vmemmap accounting Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-15 14:44 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-16 6:23 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-16 6:48 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 07/17] mm/sparse-vmemmap: support section-based vmemmap optimization Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-16 7:19 ` Muchun Song [this message]
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 08/17] mm/sparse: mark memory sections present earlier Muchun Song
2026-07-09 10:54 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-09 12:35 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-16 7:15 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 09/17] mm/hugetlb: switch HugeTLB to section-based vmemmap optimization Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 10/17] mm/mm_init: factor out pfn_to_zone() Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-16 7:18 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 11/17] mm/sparse-vmemmap: remove SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP_PREINIT support Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 12/17] mm/sparse: inline usemap allocation into sparse_init_nid() Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 13/17] mm/sparse: remove section_map_size() Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 14/17] mm/hugetlb: remove HUGE_BOOTMEM_HVO Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 15/17] mm/hugetlb: remove HUGE_BOOTMEM_CMA Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 16/17] mm/hugetlb: localize struct huge_bootmem_page Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 17/17] mm/hugetlb: localize HUGE_BOOTMEM_ZONES_VALID Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=017682fe-2e47-4fca-a812-368a7ea66320@linux.dev \
--to=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox