From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/17] mm/sparse-vmemmap: introduce folio-oriented vmemmap optimization macros
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 15:38:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8dab2dd9-1e0e-4254-b46c-cfe7a12cdea3@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <178409212283.638342.14256193145803309214.b4-review@b4>
On 2026/7/15 13:08, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>> Introduce macros for those folio-oriented properties and use them to
>> replace the tail-based names in the HVO paths. This makes the code read
>> in terms of folio semantics instead of an implementation detail and
>> better matches other folio-based users such as DAX.
>>
>> No functional change intended.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> index bacd89572c5c..ea884245f499 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> @@ -107,13 +107,15 @@
>> is_power_of_2(sizeof(struct page)) ? \
>> MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES * sizeof(struct page) : 0)
>>
>> -/*
>> - * vmemmap optimization (like HVO) is only possible for page orders that fill
>> - * two or more pages with struct pages.
>> - */
>> -#define VMEMMAP_TAIL_MIN_ORDER (ilog2(2 * PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct page)))
>> -#define __NR_VMEMMAP_TAILS (MAX_FOLIO_ORDER - VMEMMAP_TAIL_MIN_ORDER + 1)
>> -#define NR_VMEMMAP_TAILS (__NR_VMEMMAP_TAILS > 0 ? __NR_VMEMMAP_TAILS : 0)
>> +/* The number of vmemmap pages required by a vmemmap-optimized folio. */
>> +#define OPTIMIZED_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_PAGES 1
>> +#define OPTIMIZED_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_SIZE (OPTIMIZED_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_PAGES * PAGE_SIZE)
>> +#define OPTIMIZED_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_NR_STRUCT_PAGES (OPTIMIZED_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_SIZE / sizeof(struct page))
>> +#define OPTIMIZABLE_FOLIO_MIN_ORDER (ilog2(OPTIMIZED_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_NR_STRUCT_PAGES) + 1)
>> +
>> +#define __NR_OPTIMIZABLE_FOLIO_ORDERS (MAX_FOLIO_ORDER - OPTIMIZABLE_FOLIO_MIN_ORDER + 1)
>> +#define NR_OPTIMIZABLE_FOLIO_ORDERS \
>> + (__NR_OPTIMIZABLE_FOLIO_ORDERS > 0 ? __NR_OPTIMIZABLE_FOLIO_ORDERS : 0)
> I can't say I like the new names, they read like some folio optimization
> rather than vmemmap optimization.
>
> I think they should be namespaced with VMEMMAP_ or even
> VMEMMAP_OPTIMIZATION_ (or VMEMMAP_OPT_) and should not mention folio.
If you're okay with it, I'll update those macros to:
VMEMMAP_OPTIMIZATION_NR_STRUCT_PAGES
VMEMMAP_OPTIMIZATION_MIN_ORDER
VMEMMAP_OPTIMIZATION_NR_ORDERS
>
> I'd also drop intermediate defines OPTIMIZED_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_PAGES and
> OPTIMIZED_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_SIZE and use 1 and PAGE_SIZE directly.
OK. I'll not introduce OPTIMIZED_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_PAGES and
OPTIMIZED_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_SIZE
Muchun,
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-16 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-02 9:38 [PATCH 00/17] mm: Introduce section-based vmemmap optimization for HugeTLB Muchun Song
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 01/17] mm/sparse: drop power-of-2 size requirement for struct mem_section Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-15 9:34 ` David Laight
2026-07-15 13:15 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-15 15:52 ` David Laight
2026-07-16 6:51 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 02/17] mm/sparse-vmemmap: track compound page order in " Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-15 6:42 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-15 9:45 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-16 9:15 ` David Laight
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 03/17] mm/sparse-vmemmap: introduce folio-oriented vmemmap optimization macros Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-16 7:38 ` Muchun Song [this message]
2026-07-16 10:04 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 04/17] mm/mm_init: skip initializing shared vmemmap tail pages Muchun Song
2026-07-09 10:45 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-09 12:31 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-09 13:05 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-09 13:23 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-15 9:11 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-15 9:47 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 05/17] mm/sparse-vmemmap: initialize shared tail vmemmap pages on allocation Muchun Song
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 06/17] mm/sparse-vmemmap: support section-based vmemmap accounting Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-15 14:44 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-16 6:23 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-16 6:48 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 07/17] mm/sparse-vmemmap: support section-based vmemmap optimization Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-16 7:19 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 08/17] mm/sparse: mark memory sections present earlier Muchun Song
2026-07-09 10:54 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-09 12:35 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-16 7:15 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 09/17] mm/hugetlb: switch HugeTLB to section-based vmemmap optimization Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 10/17] mm/mm_init: factor out pfn_to_zone() Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-16 7:18 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 11/17] mm/sparse-vmemmap: remove SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP_PREINIT support Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 12/17] mm/sparse: inline usemap allocation into sparse_init_nid() Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 13/17] mm/sparse: remove section_map_size() Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 14/17] mm/hugetlb: remove HUGE_BOOTMEM_HVO Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 15/17] mm/hugetlb: remove HUGE_BOOTMEM_CMA Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 16/17] mm/hugetlb: localize struct huge_bootmem_page Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 17/17] mm/hugetlb: localize HUGE_BOOTMEM_ZONES_VALID Muchun Song
2026-07-15 5:08 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8dab2dd9-1e0e-4254-b46c-cfe7a12cdea3@linux.dev \
--to=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox