From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: Oz Tiram <oz@shift-computing.de>, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: alexander.deucher@amd.com, christian.koenig@amd.com,
airlied@gmail.com, simona@ffwll.ch,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/amd/amdgpu: add firmware file fallback for APU VBIOS discovery
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 08:13:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0478bdcd-dc55-4eeb-b7a3-6c5e625ac5c1@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cc849fb3-224e-43c0-bc50-67fd025009e7@shift-computing.de>
On 7/8/26 08:10, Oz Tiram wrote:
> Hi Mario,
>
> > If you drop that - does this notice still come up?
>
> No, the notice does not appear without pci=realloc,assign-busses. The
> iGPU stays at its POST bus (0x6A = 106), VFCT matches directly, and it
> fetches the VBIOS without any mismatch.
>
> However, dropping the kernel argument is not an option on this machine:
> without it the discrete GPU (0x7449) fails to probe entirely:
>
> amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: Fatal error during GPU init
> amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: probe with driver amdgpu failed with error -12
>
> The firmware BARs cannot be mapped without resource reallocation, so
> pci=realloc,assign-busses is required for the dGPU, which in turn reassigns
> the iGPU to bus 0x0B and triggers the mismatch your patch resolves.
Got it; thanks for clarifying. I would like to dig a little bit futher
into that though. What kernel are you finding this behavior and can it
still reproduce with 7.2-rc2 if it's older? There was a bunch of
pci/realloc changes that happened in the last cycle that might have
helped this.
Also; is it an eGPU (external) or dGPU (internal)?
If it's an dGPU IMO this is arguably a BIOS issue that not enough
resources were applied in the first place.
Thanks,
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Oz
>
>
> On 7/8/26 14:55, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>> Hi Oz,
>>
>> On 7/8/26 07:36, Oz Tiram wrote:
>>> Hi Mario,
>>>
>>> Tested on a Morefine MNAS X1 AI Workstation (AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 8845HS /
>>> Radeon 780M iGPU) with pci=realloc,assign-busses.
>>>
>>> The VFCT entry for the iGPU has PCIBus=106 (0x6A, recorded at POST)
>>> while the
>>> runtime bus is 11 (0x0B). Your patch fires exactly as expected:
>>>
>>> amdgpu 0000:0b:00.0: amdgpu: VFCT bus number mismatch: table 106 !
>>> = runtime 11,
>>> matching by device identity (vendor 0x1002 device 0x1900)
>>> amdgpu 0000:0b:00.0: amdgpu: Fetched VBIOS from VFCT
>>>
>>> The iGPU initialises fully and drives the framebuffer.
>>>
>>> One minor nit: the dev_notice format string ends with \\n (two
>>> characters) rather
>>> than \n. The resulting kernel message has a literal "\n" at the end.
>>> Same issue
>>> exists in the nearby "too short #2" dev_info -- not introduced by
>>> your patch, but
>>> might be worth cleaning up.
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Oz Tiram <oz@shift-computing.de>
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for confirming. Before I split up this patch and post it in
>> smaller logical pieces can you confirm my proposed root cause is right
>> that this issue happens because "pci=realloc,assign-busses" was on
>> your kernel command line?
>>
>> If you drop that - does this notice still come up?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>> On 7/6/26 02:56, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 7/5/26 14:10, Oz Tiram wrote:
>>>>> Hi Mario,
>>>>>
>>>>> To make sure I understand correctly: are you suggesting that the
>>>>> bus
>>>>> number in the VFCT was legitimate at BIOS POST time, and that
>>>>> pci=realloc,assign-busses is what changes it at runtime, causing
>>>>> the
>>>>> mismatch?
>>>>
>>>> That's what it sounds like right now. You can easily drop all the
>>>> superfluous kernel command line optiosn and see.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not familiar enough with the PCI subsystem to know the right
>>>>> way to
>>>>> implement that — could you point me in the right direction?
>>>>
>>>> Well there's a variety of ways to do it. But how about we start
>>>> here - if we make that specific busnr match optional and instead
>>>> make a VID/DID match.
>>>>
>>>> See if the attached patch helps.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Oz
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/5/26 20:37, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/5/26 05:04, Oz Tiram wrote:
>>>>>>> APUs (e.g. AMD Radeon 780M / HawkPoint, PCI 1002:1900) have no
>>>>>>> dedicated VBIOS ROM chip. amdgpu_get_bios_apu() attempts four paths
>>>>>>> before giving up:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. ACPI VFCT table
>>>>>>> 2. VRAM BAR read
>>>>>>> 3. ROM BAR read
>>>>>>> 4. platform BIOS
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On some systems all four fail. The specific case motivating this
>>>>>>> patch
>>>>>>> is a hybrid graphics machine (dGPU + APU) where:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - The VFCT table contains the iGPU entry but with a stale
>>>>>>> PCIBus value
>>>>>>> from BIOS POST time (0x6A). When the kernel boots with
>>>>>>> pci=realloc,assign-busses, PCI bus numbers are reassigned
>>>>>>> dynamically
>>>>>>> and the iGPU lands on bus 0x0B at runtime.
>>>>>>> amdgpu_acpi_vfct_bios()
>>>>>>> matches entries by bus number, so the entry is never found.
>>>>>>> - The VRAM BAR is unmapped at probe time.
>>>>>>> - The ROM BAR is zero (PCI firmware did not assign it).
>>>>>>> - No platform BIOS mapping exists.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The UEFI GOP driver initialises the iGPU successfully for early
>>>>>>> display,
>>>>>>> confirming the hardware is functional. The VBIOS image data
>>>>>>> embedded in
>>>>>>> the VFCT is also valid; only the PCIBus metadata is wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So the BIOS on this machine is actually totally fine; it's just
>>>>>> when the kernel is booted to reassign busses there is a problem?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In that case; why not detect the kernel was booted this way and
>>>>>> keep track of the original bus number when reassigned to avoid the
>>>>>> issue?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The firmware
>>>>>>> file can be extracted directly from the VFCT using dd:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> dd if=/sys/firmware/acpi/tables/VFCT bs=1 skip=$((0x68))
>>>>>>> count=16896 \
>>>>>>> of=/lib/firmware/amdgpu/1002_1900.bin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (0x68 is the byte offset of the VBIOS image after the ACPI table
>>>>>>> header
>>>>>>> and VFCT_IMAGE_HEADER; the image length 16896 comes from the
>>>>>>> ImageLength
>>>>>>> field in VFCT_IMAGE_HEADER.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The driver then prints "Unable to locate a BIOS ROM" and refuses to
>>>>>>> bind, leaving the APU completely unusable under Linux.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Add a fifth fallback: request a firmware file named
>>>>>>> "amdgpu/<vendor>_<device>.bin" (e.g. "amdgpu/1002_1900.bin") via
>>>>>>> request_firmware(). This allows a VBIOS image extracted as above
>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>> placed in /lib/firmware/ and makes the binding succeed without
>>>>>>> patching
>>>>>>> ACPI tables or BIOS.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The fallback is only reached if all existing paths have already
>>>>>>> failed,
>>>>>>> so there is no regression risk for boards where VFCT or ROM BAR
>>>>>>> work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What happens if the VBIOS changes in another way one boot to
>>>>>> another? You might have some other stateful information that isn't
>>>>>> updated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The whole thing to me feels like a hack for a behavior we can
>>>>>> control in the kernel when doing reassignments.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Oz Tiram <oz@shift-computing.de>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> v2: Fix commit message: clarify that VFCT contains the iGPU entry
>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>> with a stale PCIBus from BIOS POST that mismatches the
>>>>>>> runtime bus
>>>>>>> number assigned by pci=realloc,assign-busses. Explain that
>>>>>>> the VBIOS
>>>>>>> image data is valid and document the dd extraction command
>>>>>>> and byte
>>>>>>> offsets. Note that the UEFI GOP driver initialises the iGPU
>>>>>>> successfully, confirming the hardware is functional.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bios.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>> ++ ++++
>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bios.c b/drivers/
>>>>>>> gpu/ drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bios.c
>>>>>>> index aa039e148a5e..86064c753b09 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bios.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bios.c
>>>>>>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>>>>>>> * Jerome Glisse
>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>> +#include <linux/firmware.h>
>>>>>>> #include "amdgpu.h"
>>>>>>> #include "atom.h"
>>>>>>> @@ -457,6 +458,28 @@ static bool amdgpu_get_bios_apu(struct
>>>>>>> amdgpu_device *adev)
>>>>>>> goto success;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> + {
>>>>>>> + const struct firmware *fw;
>>>>>>> + char fw_name[32];
>>>>>>> + size_t fw_size;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + snprintf(fw_name, sizeof(fw_name), "amdgpu/%04x_%04x.bin",
>>>>>>> + adev->pdev->vendor, adev->pdev->device);
>>>>>>> + if (request_firmware(&fw, fw_name, adev->dev) == 0) {
>>>>>>> + adev->bios = kmemdup(fw->data, fw->size, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>>>> + fw_size = fw->size;
>>>>>>> + release_firmware(fw);
>>>>>>> + if (!adev->bios || !check_atom_bios(adev, fw_size)) {
>>>>>>> + amdgpu_bios_release(adev);
>>>>>>> + } else {
>>>>>>> + adev->bios_size = fw_size;
>>>>>>> + dev_info(adev->dev, "Fetched VBIOS from firmware
>>>>>>> file %s\n",
>>>>>>> + fw_name);
>>>>>>> + goto success;
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> dev_err(adev->dev, "Unable to locate a BIOS ROM\n");
>>>>>>> return false;
>>>>>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-21 17:32 [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: add firmware file fallback for APU VBIOS discovery Oz Tiram
2026-06-21 18:01 ` Oz Tiram
2026-06-26 17:42 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-06-26 19:38 ` Alex Deucher
2026-07-05 10:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Oz Tiram
2026-07-05 18:37 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-05 19:10 ` Oz Tiram
2026-07-06 0:56 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-08 12:36 ` Oz Tiram
2026-07-08 12:55 ` Mario Limonciello
[not found] ` <cc849fb3-224e-43c0-bc50-67fd025009e7@shift-computing.de>
2026-07-08 13:13 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2026-07-08 16:35 ` Oz Tiram
2026-07-08 16:39 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-08 17:53 ` Oz Tiram
[not found] ` <d224d046-0480-4e38-9e93-29a0d37f3331@shift-computing.de>
2026-07-08 17:59 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-08 18:02 ` Alex Deucher
2026-07-08 18:03 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-08 18:12 ` Alex Deucher
2026-07-05 10:15 ` [PATCH] " Oz Tiram
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0478bdcd-dc55-4eeb-b7a3-6c5e625ac5c1@amd.com \
--to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oz@shift-computing.de \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox