From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Cc: Oz Tiram <oz@shift-computing.de>,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, alexander.deucher@amd.com,
christian.koenig@amd.com, airlied@gmail.com, simona@ffwll.ch,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/amd/amdgpu: add firmware file fallback for APU VBIOS discovery
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 13:03:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a316f414-b995-4ee6-a082-259b4ea2d7ca@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADnq5_Niga7=B9DqPAOJLkBGMqf25jfcexeCXzBO5_4Cu-Lfhg@mail.gmail.com>
On 7/8/26 13:02, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2026 at 1:59 PM Mario Limonciello
> <mario.limonciello@amd.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/8/26 12:52, Oz Tiram wrote:
>>> Hi Mario,
>>>
>>> Tested on 7.2-rc2 with your patch applied. The mismatch condition is
>>> unchanged from 6.18.35:
>>>
>>> amdgpu 0000:0b:00.0: VFCT bus number mismatch: table 106 != runtime 11,
>>> matching by device identity (vendor 0x1002 device 0x1900)
>>> amdgpu 0000:0b:00.0: Fetched VBIOS from VFCT
>>>
>>> Both GPUs initialise fully with your patch.
>>>
>>> I also tested 7.2-rc2 without pci=realloc,assign-busses to check whether
>>> the pci/realloc changes fixed the dGPU probe failure. They did not -- the
>>> dGPU still fails on 7.2-rc2:
>>>
>>> amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: Fatal error during GPU init
>>> amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: probe with driver amdgpu failed with error -12
>>>
>>> Without the kernel argument the iGPU sits at its POST bus (0x6A), VFCT
>>> matches directly, and it works fine -- but the dGPU is unusable.
>>> pci=realloc,assign-busses remains necessary for this machine on 7.2-rc2,
>>> which means the VFCT mismatch persists and your patch is still needed.
>>>
>>> Thank you for not giving up on me so quickly!
>>> This is my first time working on such issue. It feels
>>> daunting to modify kernel code.
>>
>> OK, in that case I will clean up and post the patches shortly. You'll
>> be able to use them for a workaround if everyone else is aligned. The
>> part I'm worried about with these is how they would interplay with a
>> system with multiple of the same GPU. But I don't believe we would be
>> fetching VBIOS from VFCT in that case most likely? Not sure.
>
> It's allowed by the spec. A number of apple systems use VFCT for
> multu-GPU systems with the same GPU.
But then what happens with the bus numbers? They all need to be on the
same bus?
>
> Alex
>
>>
>> We really shouldn't have to set pci=realloc,assign-busses on a design
>> with all internal PCIe devices. We should adjust resource allocation
>> code for this case.
>>
>> So please start another another thread with the linux-pci mailing list
>> on this issue, include a full dmesg showing what happens when you don't
>> add the parameters and then what happens when you do (feel free to
>> include/reference this patch in that thread too).
>>
>> If you want to use one, this is the kind of thing an LLM with access to
>> a kernel checkout and both those dmesgs might be good at helping to
>> propose a draft for a solution to the resource allocation code too.
>>
>> You can CC me on that linux-pci mailing list submission, and we'll see
>> if we can come up with a better solution for you.
>>
>>>
>>> Oz
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/8/26 18:39, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>>> On 7/8/26 11:35, Oz Tiram wrote:
>>>>> Hi Mario,
>>>>>
>>>>> The GPU is internal. It's an AMD RADEON PRO W7800 48GB.
>>>>> The kernel is built from gentoo-sources-6.18.35.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will test the latest sys-kernel/vanilla-sources (7.1.3) and let you
>>>>> know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks. Can you please test 7.2-rc2?
>>>>
>>>> I'll clean up the workaround and propose it for review in parallel.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Oz
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/8/26 15:13, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/8/26 08:10, Oz Tiram wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Mario,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > If you drop that - does this notice still come up?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, the notice does not appear without pci=realloc,assign-busses.
>>>>>>> The iGPU stays at its POST bus (0x6A = 106), VFCT matches
>>>>>>> directly, and it fetches the VBIOS without any mismatch.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, dropping the kernel argument is not an option on this
>>>>>>> machine:
>>>>>>> without it the discrete GPU (0x7449) fails to probe entirely:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: Fatal error during GPU init
>>>>>>> amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: probe with driver amdgpu failed with error -12
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The firmware BARs cannot be mapped without resource reallocation, so
>>>>>>> pci=realloc,assign-busses is required for the dGPU, which in turn
>>>>>>> reassigns
>>>>>>> the iGPU to bus 0x0B and triggers the mismatch your patch resolves.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Got it; thanks for clarifying. I would like to dig a little bit
>>>>>> futher into that though. What kernel are you finding this behavior
>>>>>> and can it still reproduce with 7.2-rc2 if it's older? There was a
>>>>>> bunch of pci/realloc changes that happened in the last cycle that
>>>>>> might have helped this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also; is it an eGPU (external) or dGPU (internal)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If it's an dGPU IMO this is arguably a BIOS issue that not enough
>>>>>> resources were applied in the first place.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oz
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 7/8/26 14:55, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Oz,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 7/8/26 07:36, Oz Tiram wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Mario,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Tested on a Morefine MNAS X1 AI Workstation (AMD Ryzen 7 Pro
>>>>>>>>> 8845HS / Radeon 780M iGPU) with pci=realloc,assign-busses.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The VFCT entry for the iGPU has PCIBus=106 (0x6A, recorded at
>>>>>>>>> POST) while the
>>>>>>>>> runtime bus is 11 (0x0B). Your patch fires exactly as expected:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> amdgpu 0000:0b:00.0: amdgpu: VFCT bus number mismatch: table
>>>>>>>>> 106 ! = runtime 11,
>>>>>>>>> matching by device identity (vendor 0x1002 device 0x1900)
>>>>>>>>> amdgpu 0000:0b:00.0: amdgpu: Fetched VBIOS from VFCT
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The iGPU initialises fully and drives the framebuffer.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> One minor nit: the dev_notice format string ends with \\n (two
>>>>>>>>> characters) rather
>>>>>>>>> than \n. The resulting kernel message has a literal "\n" at the
>>>>>>>>> end. Same issue
>>>>>>>>> exists in the nearby "too short #2" dev_info -- not introduced by
>>>>>>>>> your patch, but
>>>>>>>>> might be worth cleaning up.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Tested-by: Oz Tiram <oz@shift-computing.de>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for confirming. Before I split up this patch and post it
>>>>>>>> in smaller logical pieces can you confirm my proposed root cause
>>>>>>>> is right that this issue happens because "pci=realloc,assign-
>>>>>>>> busses" was on your kernel command line?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you drop that - does this notice still come up?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/26 02:56, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 7/5/26 14:10, Oz Tiram wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Mario,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> To make sure I understand correctly: are you suggesting that
>>>>>>>>>>> the bus
>>>>>>>>>>> number in the VFCT was legitimate at BIOS POST time, and that
>>>>>>>>>>> pci=realloc,assign-busses is what changes it at runtime,
>>>>>>>>>>> causing the
>>>>>>>>>>> mismatch?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's what it sounds like right now. You can easily drop all
>>>>>>>>>> the superfluous kernel command line optiosn and see.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not familiar enough with the PCI subsystem to know the
>>>>>>>>>>> right way to
>>>>>>>>>>> implement that — could you point me in the right direction?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Well there's a variety of ways to do it. But how about we start
>>>>>>>>>> here - if we make that specific busnr match optional and instead
>>>>>>>>>> make a VID/DID match.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> See if the attached patch helps.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Oz
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/5/26 20:37, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/5/26 05:04, Oz Tiram wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> APUs (e.g. AMD Radeon 780M / HawkPoint, PCI 1002:1900) have no
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dedicated VBIOS ROM chip. amdgpu_get_bios_apu() attempts
>>>>>>>>>>>>> four paths
>>>>>>>>>>>>> before giving up:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. ACPI VFCT table
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. VRAM BAR read
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. ROM BAR read
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. platform BIOS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On some systems all four fail. The specific case motivating
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this patch
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a hybrid graphics machine (dGPU + APU) where:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - The VFCT table contains the iGPU entry but with a stale
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PCIBus value
>>>>>>>>>>>>> from BIOS POST time (0x6A). When the kernel boots with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pci=realloc,assign-busses, PCI bus numbers are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> reassigned dynamically
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the iGPU lands on bus 0x0B at runtime.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> amdgpu_acpi_vfct_bios()
>>>>>>>>>>>>> matches entries by bus number, so the entry is never found.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - The VRAM BAR is unmapped at probe time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - The ROM BAR is zero (PCI firmware did not assign it).
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - No platform BIOS mapping exists.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The UEFI GOP driver initialises the iGPU successfully for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> early display,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> confirming the hardware is functional. The VBIOS image data
>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the VFCT is also valid; only the PCIBus metadata is wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So the BIOS on this machine is actually totally fine; it's
>>>>>>>>>>>> just when the kernel is booted to reassign busses there is a
>>>>>>>>>>>> problem?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In that case; why not detect the kernel was booted this way
>>>>>>>>>>>> and keep track of the original bus number when reassigned to
>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid the issue?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The firmware
>>>>>>>>>>>>> file can be extracted directly from the VFCT using dd:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dd if=/sys/firmware/acpi/tables/VFCT bs=1 skip=$((0x68))
>>>>>>>>>>>>> count=16896 \
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of=/lib/firmware/amdgpu/1002_1900.bin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (0x68 is the byte offset of the VBIOS image after the ACPI
>>>>>>>>>>>>> table header
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and VFCT_IMAGE_HEADER; the image length 16896 comes from the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ImageLength
>>>>>>>>>>>>> field in VFCT_IMAGE_HEADER.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The driver then prints "Unable to locate a BIOS ROM" and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> refuses to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> bind, leaving the APU completely unusable under Linux.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Add a fifth fallback: request a firmware file named
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "amdgpu/<vendor>_<device>.bin" (e.g. "amdgpu/1002_1900.bin") via
>>>>>>>>>>>>> request_firmware(). This allows a VBIOS image extracted as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> above to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> placed in /lib/firmware/ and makes the binding succeed
>>>>>>>>>>>>> without patching
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ACPI tables or BIOS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The fallback is only reached if all existing paths have
>>>>>>>>>>>>> already failed,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> so there is no regression risk for boards where VFCT or ROM
>>>>>>>>>>>>> BAR work.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What happens if the VBIOS changes in another way one boot to
>>>>>>>>>>>> another? You might have some other stateful information that
>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't updated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The whole thing to me feels like a hack for a behavior we can
>>>>>>>>>>>> control in the kernel when doing reassignments.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Oz Tiram <oz@shift-computing.de>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>> v2: Fix commit message: clarify that VFCT contains the iGPU
>>>>>>>>>>>>> entry but
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with a stale PCIBus from BIOS POST that mismatches the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> runtime bus
>>>>>>>>>>>>> number assigned by pci=realloc,assign-busses. Explain
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that the VBIOS
>>>>>>>>>>>>> image data is valid and document the dd extraction
>>>>>>>>>>>>> command and byte
>>>>>>>>>>>>> offsets. Note that the UEFI GOP driver initialises the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> iGPU
>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully, confirming the hardware is functional.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bios.c | 23 +++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ++ ++ ++ ++++
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bios.c b/
>>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers/ gpu/ drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bios.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>> index aa039e148a5e..86064c753b09 100644
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bios.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bios.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jerome Glisse
>>>>>>>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +#include <linux/firmware.h>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> #include "amdgpu.h"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> #include "atom.h"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -457,6 +458,28 @@ static bool amdgpu_get_bios_apu(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>>> amdgpu_device *adev)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> goto success;
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + {
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + const struct firmware *fw;
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + char fw_name[32];
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + size_t fw_size;
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + snprintf(fw_name, sizeof(fw_name), "amdgpu/
>>>>>>>>>>>>> %04x_%04x.bin",
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + adev->pdev->vendor, adev->pdev->device);
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + if (request_firmware(&fw, fw_name, adev->dev) == 0) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + adev->bios = kmemdup(fw->data, fw->size,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + fw_size = fw->size;
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + release_firmware(fw);
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + if (!adev->bios || !check_atom_bios(adev,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fw_size)) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + amdgpu_bios_release(adev);
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + } else {
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + adev->bios_size = fw_size;
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + dev_info(adev->dev, "Fetched VBIOS from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> firmware file %s\n",
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + fw_name);
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + goto success;
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dev_err(adev->dev, "Unable to locate a BIOS ROM\n");
>>>>>>>>>>>>> return false;
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-21 17:32 [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: add firmware file fallback for APU VBIOS discovery Oz Tiram
2026-06-21 18:01 ` Oz Tiram
2026-06-26 17:42 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-06-26 19:38 ` Alex Deucher
2026-07-05 10:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Oz Tiram
2026-07-05 18:37 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-05 19:10 ` Oz Tiram
2026-07-06 0:56 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-08 12:36 ` Oz Tiram
2026-07-08 12:55 ` Mario Limonciello
[not found] ` <cc849fb3-224e-43c0-bc50-67fd025009e7@shift-computing.de>
2026-07-08 13:13 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-08 16:35 ` Oz Tiram
2026-07-08 16:39 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-08 17:53 ` Oz Tiram
[not found] ` <d224d046-0480-4e38-9e93-29a0d37f3331@shift-computing.de>
2026-07-08 17:59 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-08 18:02 ` Alex Deucher
2026-07-08 18:03 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2026-07-08 18:12 ` Alex Deucher
2026-07-05 10:15 ` [PATCH] " Oz Tiram
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a316f414-b995-4ee6-a082-259b4ea2d7ca@amd.com \
--to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oz@shift-computing.de \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox