From: Oz Tiram <oz@shift-computing.de>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: alexander.deucher@amd.com, christian.koenig@amd.com,
airlied@gmail.com, simona@ffwll.ch,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/amd/amdgpu: add firmware file fallback for APU VBIOS discovery
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 14:36:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80f34509-9781-421e-b60f-1b8c772a01a9@shift-computing.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bd1f1632-f53d-4bfd-9d28-5b66e466366c@amd.com>
Hi Mario,
Tested on a Morefine MNAS X1 AI Workstation (AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 8845HS /
Radeon 780M iGPU) with pci=realloc,assign-busses.
The VFCT entry for the iGPU has PCIBus=106 (0x6A, recorded at POST)
while the
runtime bus is 11 (0x0B). Your patch fires exactly as expected:
amdgpu 0000:0b:00.0: amdgpu: VFCT bus number mismatch: table 106 !=
runtime 11,
matching by device identity (vendor 0x1002 device 0x1900)
amdgpu 0000:0b:00.0: amdgpu: Fetched VBIOS from VFCT
The iGPU initialises fully and drives the framebuffer.
One minor nit: the dev_notice format string ends with \\n (two
characters) rather
than \n. The resulting kernel message has a literal "\n" at the end.
Same issue
exists in the nearby "too short #2" dev_info -- not introduced by your
patch, but
might be worth cleaning up.
Tested-by: Oz Tiram <oz@shift-computing.de>
On 7/6/26 02:56, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>
>
> On 7/5/26 14:10, Oz Tiram wrote:
>> Hi Mario,
>>
>> To make sure I understand correctly: are you suggesting that the bus
>> number in the VFCT was legitimate at BIOS POST time, and that
>> pci=realloc,assign-busses is what changes it at runtime, causing the
>> mismatch?
>
> That's what it sounds like right now. You can easily drop all the
> superfluous kernel command line optiosn and see.
>
>>
>> I'm not familiar enough with the PCI subsystem to know the right
>> way to
>> implement that — could you point me in the right direction?
>
> Well there's a variety of ways to do it. But how about we start here
> - if we make that specific busnr match optional and instead make a
> VID/DID match.
>
> See if the attached patch helps.
>
>>
>> Oz
>>
>> On 7/5/26 20:37, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/5/26 05:04, Oz Tiram wrote:
>>>> APUs (e.g. AMD Radeon 780M / HawkPoint, PCI 1002:1900) have no
>>>> dedicated VBIOS ROM chip. amdgpu_get_bios_apu() attempts four paths
>>>> before giving up:
>>>>
>>>> 1. ACPI VFCT table
>>>> 2. VRAM BAR read
>>>> 3. ROM BAR read
>>>> 4. platform BIOS
>>>>
>>>> On some systems all four fail. The specific case motivating this
>>>> patch
>>>> is a hybrid graphics machine (dGPU + APU) where:
>>>>
>>>> - The VFCT table contains the iGPU entry but with a stale PCIBus
>>>> value
>>>> from BIOS POST time (0x6A). When the kernel boots with
>>>> pci=realloc,assign-busses, PCI bus numbers are reassigned
>>>> dynamically
>>>> and the iGPU lands on bus 0x0B at runtime.
>>>> amdgpu_acpi_vfct_bios()
>>>> matches entries by bus number, so the entry is never found.
>>>> - The VRAM BAR is unmapped at probe time.
>>>> - The ROM BAR is zero (PCI firmware did not assign it).
>>>> - No platform BIOS mapping exists.
>>>>
>>>> The UEFI GOP driver initialises the iGPU successfully for early
>>>> display,
>>>> confirming the hardware is functional. The VBIOS image data
>>>> embedded in
>>>> the VFCT is also valid; only the PCIBus metadata is wrong.
>>>
>>> So the BIOS on this machine is actually totally fine; it's just when
>>> the kernel is booted to reassign busses there is a problem?
>>>
>>> In that case; why not detect the kernel was booted this way and keep
>>> track of the original bus number when reassigned to avoid the issue?
>>>
>>>> The firmware
>>>> file can be extracted directly from the VFCT using dd:
>>>>
>>>> dd if=/sys/firmware/acpi/tables/VFCT bs=1 skip=$((0x68))
>>>> count=16896 \
>>>> of=/lib/firmware/amdgpu/1002_1900.bin
>>>>
>>>> (0x68 is the byte offset of the VBIOS image after the ACPI table
>>>> header
>>>> and VFCT_IMAGE_HEADER; the image length 16896 comes from the
>>>> ImageLength
>>>> field in VFCT_IMAGE_HEADER.)
>>>>
>>>> The driver then prints "Unable to locate a BIOS ROM" and refuses to
>>>> bind, leaving the APU completely unusable under Linux.
>>>>
>>>> Add a fifth fallback: request a firmware file named
>>>> "amdgpu/<vendor>_<device>.bin" (e.g. "amdgpu/1002_1900.bin") via
>>>> request_firmware(). This allows a VBIOS image extracted as above
>>>> to be
>>>> placed in /lib/firmware/ and makes the binding succeed without
>>>> patching
>>>> ACPI tables or BIOS.
>>>>
>>>> The fallback is only reached if all existing paths have already
>>>> failed,
>>>> so there is no regression risk for boards where VFCT or ROM BAR work.
>>>
>>> What happens if the VBIOS changes in another way one boot to
>>> another? You might have some other stateful information that isn't
>>> updated.
>>>
>>> The whole thing to me feels like a hack for a behavior we can
>>> control in the kernel when doing reassignments.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Oz Tiram <oz@shift-computing.de>
>>>> ---
>>>> v2: Fix commit message: clarify that VFCT contains the iGPU entry but
>>>> with a stale PCIBus from BIOS POST that mismatches the runtime
>>>> bus
>>>> number assigned by pci=realloc,assign-busses. Explain that
>>>> the VBIOS
>>>> image data is valid and document the dd extraction command and
>>>> byte
>>>> offsets. Note that the UEFI GOP driver initialises the iGPU
>>>> successfully, confirming the hardware is functional.
>>>>
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bios.c | 23
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bios.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/ drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bios.c
>>>> index aa039e148a5e..86064c753b09 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bios.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bios.c
>>>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>>>> * Jerome Glisse
>>>> */
>>>> +#include <linux/firmware.h>
>>>> #include "amdgpu.h"
>>>> #include "atom.h"
>>>> @@ -457,6 +458,28 @@ static bool amdgpu_get_bios_apu(struct
>>>> amdgpu_device *adev)
>>>> goto success;
>>>> }
>>>> + {
>>>> + const struct firmware *fw;
>>>> + char fw_name[32];
>>>> + size_t fw_size;
>>>> +
>>>> + snprintf(fw_name, sizeof(fw_name), "amdgpu/%04x_%04x.bin",
>>>> + adev->pdev->vendor, adev->pdev->device);
>>>> + if (request_firmware(&fw, fw_name, adev->dev) == 0) {
>>>> + adev->bios = kmemdup(fw->data, fw->size, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + fw_size = fw->size;
>>>> + release_firmware(fw);
>>>> + if (!adev->bios || !check_atom_bios(adev, fw_size)) {
>>>> + amdgpu_bios_release(adev);
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + adev->bios_size = fw_size;
>>>> + dev_info(adev->dev, "Fetched VBIOS from firmware
>>>> file %s\n",
>>>> + fw_name);
>>>> + goto success;
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> dev_err(adev->dev, "Unable to locate a BIOS ROM\n");
>>>> return false;
>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-21 17:32 [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: add firmware file fallback for APU VBIOS discovery Oz Tiram
2026-06-21 18:01 ` Oz Tiram
2026-06-26 17:42 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-06-26 19:38 ` Alex Deucher
2026-07-05 10:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Oz Tiram
2026-07-05 18:37 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-05 19:10 ` Oz Tiram
2026-07-06 0:56 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-08 12:36 ` Oz Tiram [this message]
2026-07-08 12:55 ` Mario Limonciello
[not found] ` <cc849fb3-224e-43c0-bc50-67fd025009e7@shift-computing.de>
2026-07-08 13:13 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-08 16:35 ` Oz Tiram
2026-07-08 16:39 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-08 17:53 ` Oz Tiram
[not found] ` <d224d046-0480-4e38-9e93-29a0d37f3331@shift-computing.de>
2026-07-08 17:59 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-08 18:02 ` Alex Deucher
2026-07-08 18:03 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-08 18:12 ` Alex Deucher
2026-07-05 10:15 ` [PATCH] " Oz Tiram
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=80f34509-9781-421e-b60f-1b8c772a01a9@shift-computing.de \
--to=oz@shift-computing.de \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox