From: Oz Tiram <oz@shift-computing.de>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: alexander.deucher@amd.com, christian.koenig@amd.com,
airlied@gmail.com, simona@ffwll.ch,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/amd/amdgpu: add firmware file fallback for APU VBIOS discovery
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 18:35:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e2eaccf-823b-4db2-a4f3-451e5753af8d@shift-computing.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0478bdcd-dc55-4eeb-b7a3-6c5e625ac5c1@amd.com>
Hi Mario,
The GPU is internal. It's an AMD RADEON PRO W7800 48GB.
The kernel is built from gentoo-sources-6.18.35.
I will test the latest sys-kernel/vanilla-sources (7.1.3) and let you know.
Best regards,
Oz
On 7/8/26 15:13, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>
> On 7/8/26 08:10, Oz Tiram wrote:
>> Hi Mario,
>>
>> > If you drop that - does this notice still come up?
>>
>> No, the notice does not appear without pci=realloc,assign-busses. The
>> iGPU stays at its POST bus (0x6A = 106), VFCT matches directly, and
>> it fetches the VBIOS without any mismatch.
>>
>> However, dropping the kernel argument is not an option on this machine:
>> without it the discrete GPU (0x7449) fails to probe entirely:
>>
>> amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: Fatal error during GPU init
>> amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: probe with driver amdgpu failed with error -12
>>
>> The firmware BARs cannot be mapped without resource reallocation, so
>> pci=realloc,assign-busses is required for the dGPU, which in turn
>> reassigns
>> the iGPU to bus 0x0B and triggers the mismatch your patch resolves.
>
> Got it; thanks for clarifying. I would like to dig a little bit
> futher into that though. What kernel are you finding this behavior
> and can it still reproduce with 7.2-rc2 if it's older? There was a
> bunch of pci/realloc changes that happened in the last cycle that
> might have helped this.
>
> Also; is it an eGPU (external) or dGPU (internal)?
>
> If it's an dGPU IMO this is arguably a BIOS issue that not enough
> resources were applied in the first place.
>
> Thanks,
>
>>
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Oz
>>
>>
>> On 7/8/26 14:55, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>> Hi Oz,
>>>
>>> On 7/8/26 07:36, Oz Tiram wrote:
>>>> Hi Mario,
>>>>
>>>> Tested on a Morefine MNAS X1 AI Workstation (AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 8845HS
>>>> / Radeon 780M iGPU) with pci=realloc,assign-busses.
>>>>
>>>> The VFCT entry for the iGPU has PCIBus=106 (0x6A, recorded at POST)
>>>> while the
>>>> runtime bus is 11 (0x0B). Your patch fires exactly as expected:
>>>>
>>>> amdgpu 0000:0b:00.0: amdgpu: VFCT bus number mismatch: table 106
>>>> ! = runtime 11,
>>>> matching by device identity (vendor 0x1002 device 0x1900)
>>>> amdgpu 0000:0b:00.0: amdgpu: Fetched VBIOS from VFCT
>>>>
>>>> The iGPU initialises fully and drives the framebuffer.
>>>>
>>>> One minor nit: the dev_notice format string ends with \\n (two
>>>> characters) rather
>>>> than \n. The resulting kernel message has a literal "\n" at the
>>>> end. Same issue
>>>> exists in the nearby "too short #2" dev_info -- not introduced by
>>>> your patch, but
>>>> might be worth cleaning up.
>>>>
>>>> Tested-by: Oz Tiram <oz@shift-computing.de>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for confirming. Before I split up this patch and post it in
>>> smaller logical pieces can you confirm my proposed root cause is
>>> right that this issue happens because "pci=realloc,assign-busses"
>>> was on your kernel command line?
>>>
>>> If you drop that - does this notice still come up?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>> On 7/6/26 02:56, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/5/26 14:10, Oz Tiram wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Mario,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To make sure I understand correctly: are you suggesting that
>>>>>> the bus
>>>>>> number in the VFCT was legitimate at BIOS POST time, and that
>>>>>> pci=realloc,assign-busses is what changes it at runtime,
>>>>>> causing the
>>>>>> mismatch?
>>>>>
>>>>> That's what it sounds like right now. You can easily drop all the
>>>>> superfluous kernel command line optiosn and see.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not familiar enough with the PCI subsystem to know the
>>>>>> right way to
>>>>>> implement that — could you point me in the right direction?
>>>>>
>>>>> Well there's a variety of ways to do it. But how about we start
>>>>> here - if we make that specific busnr match optional and instead
>>>>> make a VID/DID match.
>>>>>
>>>>> See if the attached patch helps.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oz
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/5/26 20:37, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 7/5/26 05:04, Oz Tiram wrote:
>>>>>>>> APUs (e.g. AMD Radeon 780M / HawkPoint, PCI 1002:1900) have no
>>>>>>>> dedicated VBIOS ROM chip. amdgpu_get_bios_apu() attempts four
>>>>>>>> paths
>>>>>>>> before giving up:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. ACPI VFCT table
>>>>>>>> 2. VRAM BAR read
>>>>>>>> 3. ROM BAR read
>>>>>>>> 4. platform BIOS
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On some systems all four fail. The specific case motivating
>>>>>>>> this patch
>>>>>>>> is a hybrid graphics machine (dGPU + APU) where:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - The VFCT table contains the iGPU entry but with a stale
>>>>>>>> PCIBus value
>>>>>>>> from BIOS POST time (0x6A). When the kernel boots with
>>>>>>>> pci=realloc,assign-busses, PCI bus numbers are reassigned
>>>>>>>> dynamically
>>>>>>>> and the iGPU lands on bus 0x0B at runtime.
>>>>>>>> amdgpu_acpi_vfct_bios()
>>>>>>>> matches entries by bus number, so the entry is never found.
>>>>>>>> - The VRAM BAR is unmapped at probe time.
>>>>>>>> - The ROM BAR is zero (PCI firmware did not assign it).
>>>>>>>> - No platform BIOS mapping exists.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The UEFI GOP driver initialises the iGPU successfully for early
>>>>>>>> display,
>>>>>>>> confirming the hardware is functional. The VBIOS image data
>>>>>>>> embedded in
>>>>>>>> the VFCT is also valid; only the PCIBus metadata is wrong.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So the BIOS on this machine is actually totally fine; it's just
>>>>>>> when the kernel is booted to reassign busses there is a problem?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In that case; why not detect the kernel was booted this way and
>>>>>>> keep track of the original bus number when reassigned to avoid
>>>>>>> the issue?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The firmware
>>>>>>>> file can be extracted directly from the VFCT using dd:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> dd if=/sys/firmware/acpi/tables/VFCT bs=1 skip=$((0x68))
>>>>>>>> count=16896 \
>>>>>>>> of=/lib/firmware/amdgpu/1002_1900.bin
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (0x68 is the byte offset of the VBIOS image after the ACPI
>>>>>>>> table header
>>>>>>>> and VFCT_IMAGE_HEADER; the image length 16896 comes from the
>>>>>>>> ImageLength
>>>>>>>> field in VFCT_IMAGE_HEADER.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The driver then prints "Unable to locate a BIOS ROM" and
>>>>>>>> refuses to
>>>>>>>> bind, leaving the APU completely unusable under Linux.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Add a fifth fallback: request a firmware file named
>>>>>>>> "amdgpu/<vendor>_<device>.bin" (e.g. "amdgpu/1002_1900.bin") via
>>>>>>>> request_firmware(). This allows a VBIOS image extracted as
>>>>>>>> above to be
>>>>>>>> placed in /lib/firmware/ and makes the binding succeed without
>>>>>>>> patching
>>>>>>>> ACPI tables or BIOS.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The fallback is only reached if all existing paths have already
>>>>>>>> failed,
>>>>>>>> so there is no regression risk for boards where VFCT or ROM BAR
>>>>>>>> work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What happens if the VBIOS changes in another way one boot to
>>>>>>> another? You might have some other stateful information that
>>>>>>> isn't updated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The whole thing to me feels like a hack for a behavior we can
>>>>>>> control in the kernel when doing reassignments.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Oz Tiram <oz@shift-computing.de>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> v2: Fix commit message: clarify that VFCT contains the iGPU
>>>>>>>> entry but
>>>>>>>> with a stale PCIBus from BIOS POST that mismatches the
>>>>>>>> runtime bus
>>>>>>>> number assigned by pci=realloc,assign-busses. Explain that
>>>>>>>> the VBIOS
>>>>>>>> image data is valid and document the dd extraction command
>>>>>>>> and byte
>>>>>>>> offsets. Note that the UEFI GOP driver initialises the iGPU
>>>>>>>> successfully, confirming the hardware is functional.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bios.c | 23
>>>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++ ++ ++++
>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bios.c
>>>>>>>> b/drivers/ gpu/ drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bios.c
>>>>>>>> index aa039e148a5e..86064c753b09 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bios.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bios.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>>>>>>>> * Jerome Glisse
>>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>>> +#include <linux/firmware.h>
>>>>>>>> #include "amdgpu.h"
>>>>>>>> #include "atom.h"
>>>>>>>> @@ -457,6 +458,28 @@ static bool amdgpu_get_bios_apu(struct
>>>>>>>> amdgpu_device *adev)
>>>>>>>> goto success;
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>> + {
>>>>>>>> + const struct firmware *fw;
>>>>>>>> + char fw_name[32];
>>>>>>>> + size_t fw_size;
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + snprintf(fw_name, sizeof(fw_name),
>>>>>>>> "amdgpu/%04x_%04x.bin",
>>>>>>>> + adev->pdev->vendor, adev->pdev->device);
>>>>>>>> + if (request_firmware(&fw, fw_name, adev->dev) == 0) {
>>>>>>>> + adev->bios = kmemdup(fw->data, fw->size, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>>>>> + fw_size = fw->size;
>>>>>>>> + release_firmware(fw);
>>>>>>>> + if (!adev->bios || !check_atom_bios(adev, fw_size)) {
>>>>>>>> + amdgpu_bios_release(adev);
>>>>>>>> + } else {
>>>>>>>> + adev->bios_size = fw_size;
>>>>>>>> + dev_info(adev->dev, "Fetched VBIOS from
>>>>>>>> firmware file %s\n",
>>>>>>>> + fw_name);
>>>>>>>> + goto success;
>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> dev_err(adev->dev, "Unable to locate a BIOS ROM\n");
>>>>>>>> return false;
>>>>>>>
>>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-21 17:32 [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: add firmware file fallback for APU VBIOS discovery Oz Tiram
2026-06-21 18:01 ` Oz Tiram
2026-06-26 17:42 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-06-26 19:38 ` Alex Deucher
2026-07-05 10:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Oz Tiram
2026-07-05 18:37 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-05 19:10 ` Oz Tiram
2026-07-06 0:56 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-08 12:36 ` Oz Tiram
2026-07-08 12:55 ` Mario Limonciello
[not found] ` <cc849fb3-224e-43c0-bc50-67fd025009e7@shift-computing.de>
2026-07-08 13:13 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-08 16:35 ` Oz Tiram [this message]
2026-07-08 16:39 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-08 17:53 ` Oz Tiram
[not found] ` <d224d046-0480-4e38-9e93-29a0d37f3331@shift-computing.de>
2026-07-08 17:59 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-08 18:02 ` Alex Deucher
2026-07-08 18:03 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-08 18:12 ` Alex Deucher
2026-07-05 10:15 ` [PATCH] " Oz Tiram
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6e2eaccf-823b-4db2-a4f3-451e5753af8d@shift-computing.de \
--to=oz@shift-computing.de \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox