From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Haren Myneni <hbabu@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: perf hw in kexeced kernel broken in tip
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:11:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1291219906.32004.1671.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101201160640.GA2511@redhat.com>
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 11:06 -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 12:27:47PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 00:00 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > > First kernel:
> > > [ 1.139418] calling init_hw_perf_events+0x0/0xb77 @ 1
> > > [ 1.159111] Performance Events: PEBS fmt1+, Nehalem events, Intel PMU
> > > driver.
> > > [ 1.159567] ... version: 3
> > > [ 1.179121] ... bit width: 48
> > > [ 1.179353] ... generic registers: 4
> > > [ 1.179593] ... value mask: 0000ffffffffffff
> > > [ 1.199211] ... max period: 000000007fffffff
> > > [ 1.199554] ... fixed-purpose events: 3
> > > [ 1.219108] ... event mask: 000000070000000f
> > > [ 1.219454] initcall init_hw_perf_events+0x0/0xb77 returned 0 after
> > > 11719 usecs
> > >
> > > .....
> > > [ 20.220997] checking TSC synchronization [CPU#0 -> CPU#11]: passed.
> > > [ 20.260818] NMI watchdog enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter.
> > >
> > > kexeced kernel.
> > >
> > >
> > > [ 1.169470] calling init_hw_perf_events+0x0/0xb77 @ 1
> > > [ 1.189265] Performance Events: PEBS fmt1+, Nehalem events, Broken
> > > PMU hardware detected, software events only.
> > > ...
> > > [ 21.010407] NMI watchdog failed to create perf event on cpu14:
> > > fffffffffffffffe
> > >
> > > caused by:
> >
> > *sigh*, and people ask me why kexec/kdump are such bad ideas..
> >
> > apparently kexec doesn't properly shut down the first kernel and leaves
> > a counter running, then when we write and read the counter value they
> > don't match because its still running and voila, crap happens.
> >
> > I've CC'ed the kexec people, maybe they got clue as to how to sort this.
>
> So we can shutdown counters while first kernel is going down. Is there a
> simple function already which I can call?
Dunno, the cpu hotplug stuff should suffice I think, but then I don't
think you actually unplug the boot cpu.
What does kexec normally do to ensure hardware is left in a sane state?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-01 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-01 8:00 perf hw in kexeced kernel broken in tip Yinghai Lu
2010-12-01 11:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 16:06 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 16:11 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-12-01 16:23 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 19:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 19:46 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 19:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 19:58 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 20:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 21:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-12-02 5:23 ` Don Zickus
2010-12-02 7:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-02 16:15 ` Don Zickus
2010-12-07 23:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 14:01 ` Don Zickus
2010-12-08 14:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 14:42 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-08 14:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 15:02 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-08 15:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 15:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-08 21:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-12-08 14:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 18:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 19:01 ` Don Zickus
2010-12-08 19:05 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 19:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 19:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 19:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 19:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 22:37 ` Don Zickus
2010-12-08 23:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-12-09 4:34 ` Don Zickus
2010-12-09 20:20 ` Don Zickus
2010-12-09 20:44 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-12-08 14:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 14:39 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-07 21:16 ` Don Zickus
2010-12-08 0:26 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 10:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 20:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1291219906.32004.1671.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox