public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
	Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Haren Myneni <hbabu@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: perf hw  in kexeced kernel broken in tip
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:11:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1291219906.32004.1671.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101201160640.GA2511@redhat.com>

On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 11:06 -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 12:27:47PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 00:00 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > > First kernel:
> > > [    1.139418] calling  init_hw_perf_events+0x0/0xb77 @ 1
> > > [    1.159111] Performance Events: PEBS fmt1+, Nehalem events, Intel PMU
> > > driver.
> > > [    1.159567] ... version:                3
> > > [    1.179121] ... bit width:              48
> > > [    1.179353] ... generic registers:      4
> > > [    1.179593] ... value mask:             0000ffffffffffff
> > > [    1.199211] ... max period:             000000007fffffff
> > > [    1.199554] ... fixed-purpose events:   3
> > > [    1.219108] ... event mask:             000000070000000f
> > > [    1.219454] initcall init_hw_perf_events+0x0/0xb77 returned 0 after
> > > 11719 usecs
> > > 
> > > .....
> > > [   20.220997] checking TSC synchronization [CPU#0 -> CPU#11]: passed.
> > > [   20.260818] NMI watchdog enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter.
> > > 
> > > kexeced kernel.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > [    1.169470] calling  init_hw_perf_events+0x0/0xb77 @ 1
> > > [    1.189265] Performance Events: PEBS fmt1+, Nehalem events, Broken
> > > PMU hardware detected, software events only.
> > > ...
> > > [   21.010407] NMI watchdog failed to create perf event on cpu14:
> > > fffffffffffffffe
> > > 
> > > caused by:
> > 
> > *sigh*, and people ask me why kexec/kdump are such bad ideas..
> > 
> > apparently kexec doesn't properly shut down the first kernel and leaves
> > a counter running, then when we write and read the counter value they
> > don't match because its still running and voila, crap happens.
> > 
> > I've CC'ed the kexec people, maybe they got clue as to how to sort this.
> 
> So we can shutdown counters while first kernel is going down. Is there a
> simple function already which I can call?

Dunno, the cpu hotplug stuff should suffice I think, but then I don't
think you actually unplug the boot cpu.

What does kexec normally do to ensure hardware is left in a sane state?

  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-01 16:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-01  8:00 perf hw in kexeced kernel broken in tip Yinghai Lu
2010-12-01 11:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 16:06   ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 16:11     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-12-01 16:23       ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 19:38         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 19:46           ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 19:49             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 19:58               ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 20:07                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 21:48                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-12-02  5:23                     ` Don Zickus
2010-12-02  7:34                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-02 16:15                         ` Don Zickus
2010-12-07 23:30                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 14:01                             ` Don Zickus
2010-12-08 14:20                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 14:42                                 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-08 14:48                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 15:02                                     ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-08 15:15                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 15:22                                         ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-08 21:16                                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-12-08 14:59                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 18:43                                   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 19:01                                     ` Don Zickus
2010-12-08 19:05                                       ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 19:17                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 19:20                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 19:06                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 19:20                                       ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 22:37                                   ` Don Zickus
2010-12-08 23:20                                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-12-09  4:34                                       ` Don Zickus
2010-12-09 20:20                                   ` Don Zickus
2010-12-09 20:44                                     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-12-08 14:33                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 14:39                               ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-07 21:16                         ` Don Zickus
2010-12-08  0:26                           ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 10:39                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 20:41               ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1291219906.32004.1671.camel@laptop \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox