public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Haren Myneni <hbabu@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: perf hw  in kexeced kernel broken in tip
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:30:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1291764620.2032.1293.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101202161502.GL18100@redhat.com>

On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 11:15 -0500, Don Zickus wrote:

> Vivek suggested to me this morning that I should just blantantly disable the
> perf counter during init when running my test. 

Nah, we should actively scan for that during the bring-up and kill
hw-perf when we find an enable bit set, some BIOSes actively use the
PMU, this is something that should be discouraged.

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c |   30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 817d2b1..7f92833 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -375,15 +375,40 @@ static void release_pmc_hardware(void) {}
 static bool check_hw_exists(void)
 {
 	u64 val, val_new = 0;
-	int ret = 0;
+	int i, reg, ret = 0;
 
 	val = 0xabcdUL;
 	ret |= checking_wrmsrl(x86_pmu.perfctr, val);
 	ret |= rdmsrl_safe(x86_pmu.perfctr, &val_new);
-	if (ret || val != val_new)
+	if (ret || val != val_new) {
+		printk(KERN_CONT "Broken PMU hardware detected, software events only.\n");
 		return false;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Check to see if the BIOS enabled any of the counters, if so
+	 * complain and bail.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < x86_pmu.num_counters; i++) {
+		reg = x86_pmu.eventsel + i;
+		rdmsrl(reg, val);
+		if (val & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE)
+			goto bios_fail;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < x86_pmu.num_counters_fixed; i++) {
+		reg = MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR_CTRL;
+		rdmsrl(reg, val);
+		if (val & (0x03 << i*4))
+			goto bios_fail;
+	}
 
 	return true;
+
+bios_fail:
+	printk(KERN_CONT "Broken BIOS detected, software events only.\n");
+	printk(KERN_ERR FW_BUG "invalid MSR %x=%Lx\n", reg, val);
+	return false;
 }
 
 static void reserve_ds_buffers(void);
@@ -1379,7 +1404,6 @@ int __init init_hw_perf_events(void)
 
 	/* sanity check that the hardware exists or is emulated */
 	if (!check_hw_exists()) {
-		pr_cont("Broken PMU hardware detected, software events only.\n");
 		return 0;
 	}
 



>  Looking through the code I
> don't think I can do this using disable_all because some routines look for
> the active bit to be set and some arches have different disable registers
> than others.  Thoughts?

Something like the below, preferably I'd key that off of SYS_KEXEC, but
looking through the existing notifiers adding a state requires touching
all of them :/

---
 kernel/perf_event.c |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c
index 195393c..7abcd8d 100644
--- a/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 #include <linux/dcache.h>
 #include <linux/percpu.h>
 #include <linux/ptrace.h>
+#include <linux/reboot.h>
 #include <linux/vmstat.h>
 #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
 #include <linux/hardirq.h>
@@ -6383,6 +6384,25 @@ static void perf_event_exit_cpu(int cpu)
 static inline void perf_event_exit_cpu(int cpu) { }
 #endif
 
+static int 
+perf_reboot(struct notifier_block *notifier, unsigned long val, void *v)
+{
+	/*
+	 * XXX this relies on hotplug, does kexec do too?
+	 */
+	perf_event_exit_cpu(0);
+	return NOTIFY_OK;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Run the perf reboot notifier at the very last possible moment so that
+ * the generic watchdog code runs as long as possible.
+ */
+static struct notifier_block perf_reboot_notifier = {
+	.notifier_call = perf_reboot,
+	.priority = INT_MIN,
+};
+
 static int __cpuinit
 perf_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
 {
@@ -6418,6 +6438,7 @@ void __init perf_event_init(void)
 	perf_pmu_register(&perf_task_clock);
 	perf_tp_register();
 	perf_cpu_notifier(perf_cpu_notify);
+	register_reboot_notifier(&perf_reboot_notifier);
 
 	ret = init_hw_breakpoint();
 	WARN(ret, "hw_breakpoint initialization failed with: %d", ret);


  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-07 23:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-01  8:00 perf hw in kexeced kernel broken in tip Yinghai Lu
2010-12-01 11:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 16:06   ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 16:11     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 16:23       ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 19:38         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 19:46           ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 19:49             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 19:58               ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 20:07                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 21:48                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-12-02  5:23                     ` Don Zickus
2010-12-02  7:34                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-02 16:15                         ` Don Zickus
2010-12-07 23:30                           ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-12-08 14:01                             ` Don Zickus
2010-12-08 14:20                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 14:42                                 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-08 14:48                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 15:02                                     ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-08 15:15                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 15:22                                         ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-08 21:16                                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-12-08 14:59                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 18:43                                   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 19:01                                     ` Don Zickus
2010-12-08 19:05                                       ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 19:17                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 19:20                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 19:06                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 19:20                                       ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 22:37                                   ` Don Zickus
2010-12-08 23:20                                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-12-09  4:34                                       ` Don Zickus
2010-12-09 20:20                                   ` Don Zickus
2010-12-09 20:44                                     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-12-08 14:33                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 14:39                               ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-07 21:16                         ` Don Zickus
2010-12-08  0:26                           ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 10:39                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 20:41               ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1291764620.2032.1293.camel@laptop \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox