From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Haren Myneni <hbabu@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: perf hw in kexeced kernel broken in tip
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:33:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1291818811.28378.45.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101208140103.GM21786@redhat.com>
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 09:01 -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> Privately, I used the above wrapped with for_each_online_cpu(cpu) and it
> worked fine for me.
Something like so then?
---
Subject: perf: Stop all counters on reboot
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Date: Wed Dec 08 15:29:02 CET 2010
Use the reboot notifier to detach all running counters on reboot, this
solves a problem with kexec where the new kernel doesn't expect
running counters (rightly so).
It will however decrease the coverage of the NMI watchdog. Making a
kexec specific reboot notifier callback would be best, however that
would require touching all notifier callback handlers as they are not
properly structured to deal with new state.
As a compromise, place the perf reboot notifier at the very last
position in the list.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/perf_event.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include <linux/dcache.h>
#include <linux/percpu.h>
#include <linux/ptrace.h>
+#include <linux/reboot.h>
#include <linux/vmstat.h>
#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
#include <linux/hardirq.h>
@@ -6329,7 +6330,7 @@ static void __cpuinit perf_event_init_cp
mutex_unlock(&swhash->hlist_mutex);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
+#if defined CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU || defined CONFIG_KEXEC
static void perf_pmu_rotate_stop(struct pmu *pmu)
{
struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context);
@@ -6383,6 +6384,26 @@ static void perf_event_exit_cpu(int cpu)
static inline void perf_event_exit_cpu(int cpu) { }
#endif
+static int
+perf_reboot(struct notifier_block *notifier, unsigned long val, void *v)
+{
+ int cpu;
+
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
+ perf_event_exit_cpu(cpu);
+
+ return NOTIFY_OK;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Run the perf reboot notifier at the very last possible moment so that
+ * the generic watchdog code runs as long as possible.
+ */
+static struct notifier_block perf_reboot_notifier = {
+ .notifier_call = perf_reboot,
+ .priority = INT_MIN,
+};
+
static int __cpuinit
perf_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
{
@@ -6418,6 +6439,7 @@ void __init perf_event_init(void)
perf_pmu_register(&perf_task_clock);
perf_tp_register();
perf_cpu_notifier(perf_cpu_notify);
+ register_reboot_notifier(&perf_reboot_notifier);
ret = init_hw_breakpoint();
WARN(ret, "hw_breakpoint initialization failed with: %d", ret);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-08 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-01 8:00 perf hw in kexeced kernel broken in tip Yinghai Lu
2010-12-01 11:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 16:06 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 16:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 16:23 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 19:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 19:46 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 19:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 19:58 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 20:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 21:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-12-02 5:23 ` Don Zickus
2010-12-02 7:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-02 16:15 ` Don Zickus
2010-12-07 23:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 14:01 ` Don Zickus
2010-12-08 14:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 14:42 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-08 14:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 15:02 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-08 15:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 15:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-08 21:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-12-08 14:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 18:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 19:01 ` Don Zickus
2010-12-08 19:05 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 19:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 19:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 19:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 19:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 22:37 ` Don Zickus
2010-12-08 23:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-12-09 4:34 ` Don Zickus
2010-12-09 20:20 ` Don Zickus
2010-12-09 20:44 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-12-08 14:33 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-12-08 14:39 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-07 21:16 ` Don Zickus
2010-12-08 0:26 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 10:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 20:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1291818811.28378.45.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox