From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 03/11] block: Stop abusing rq->csd.list in blk-softirq
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 17:18:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1391876320-25068-4-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1391876320-25068-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Abusing rq->csd.list for a list of requests to complete is rather ugly.
We use rq->queuelist instead which is much cleaner. It is safe because
queuelist is used by the block layer only for requests waiting to be
submitted to a device. Thus it is unused when irq reports the request IO
is finished.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
---
block/blk-softirq.c | 17 +++++++++++------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-softirq.c b/block/blk-softirq.c
index 57790c1..b5c37d9 100644
--- a/block/blk-softirq.c
+++ b/block/blk-softirq.c
@@ -30,8 +30,8 @@ static void blk_done_softirq(struct softirq_action *h)
while (!list_empty(&local_list)) {
struct request *rq;
- rq = list_entry(local_list.next, struct request, csd.list);
- list_del_init(&rq->csd.list);
+ rq = list_entry(local_list.next, struct request, queuelist);
+ list_del_init(&rq->queuelist);
rq->q->softirq_done_fn(rq);
}
}
@@ -45,9 +45,14 @@ static void trigger_softirq(void *data)
local_irq_save(flags);
list = this_cpu_ptr(&blk_cpu_done);
- list_add_tail(&rq->csd.list, list);
+ /*
+ * We reuse queuelist for a list of requests to process. Since the
+ * queuelist is used by the block layer only for requests waiting to be
+ * submitted to the device it is unused now.
+ */
+ list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, list);
- if (list->next == &rq->csd.list)
+ if (list->next == &rq->queuelist)
raise_softirq_irqoff(BLOCK_SOFTIRQ);
local_irq_restore(flags);
@@ -136,7 +141,7 @@ void __blk_complete_request(struct request *req)
struct list_head *list;
do_local:
list = this_cpu_ptr(&blk_cpu_done);
- list_add_tail(&req->csd.list, list);
+ list_add_tail(&req->queuelist, list);
/*
* if the list only contains our just added request,
@@ -144,7 +149,7 @@ do_local:
* entries there, someone already raised the irq but it
* hasn't run yet.
*/
- if (list->next == &req->csd.list)
+ if (list->next == &req->queuelist)
raise_softirq_irqoff(BLOCK_SOFTIRQ);
} else if (raise_blk_irq(ccpu, req))
goto do_local;
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-08 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-08 16:18 [RFC PATCH 00/11] smp: Single IPI cleanups Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 01/11] block: Stop abusing csd.list for fifo_time Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 02/11] block: Remove useless IPI struct initialization Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-10 20:21 ` Jan Kara
2014-02-08 16:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 04/11] smp: Iterate functions through llist_for_each_entry_safe() Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 05/11] smp: Remove unused list_head from csd Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 06/11] smp: Teach __smp_call_function_single() to check for offline cpus Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 07/11] smp: Consolidate the various smp_call_function_single() declensions Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-10 20:27 ` Jan Kara
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 08/11] smp: Move __smp_call_function_single() below its safe version Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-10 20:29 ` Jan Kara
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 09/11] watchdog: Simplify a little the IPI call Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-10 12:26 ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-10 14:46 ` Don Zickus
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 10/11] smp: Remove wait argument from __smp_call_function_single() Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-08 16:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 11/11] smp: Enhance and precise the role & requirements of __smp_call_function_single() Frederic Weisbecker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-02-24 15:39 [PATCH 00/11] smp: Single IPI cleanups v2 Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-24 15:39 ` [PATCH 03/11] block: Stop abusing rq->csd.list in blk-softirq Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1391876320-25068-4-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox