From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 07/11] smp: Consolidate the various smp_call_function_single() declensions
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 17:18:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1391876320-25068-8-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1391876320-25068-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
__smp_call_function_single() and smp_call_function_single() share some
code that can be factorized: execute inline when the target is local,
check if the target is online, lock the csd, call generic_exec_single().
Lets move the common parts to generic_exec_single().
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
---
kernel/smp.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index 5ff14e3..64bb0d4 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -117,13 +117,43 @@ static void csd_unlock(struct call_single_data *csd)
csd->flags &= ~CSD_FLAG_LOCK;
}
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct call_single_data, csd_data);
+
/*
* Insert a previously allocated call_single_data element
* for execution on the given CPU. data must already have
* ->func, ->info, and ->flags set.
*/
-static void generic_exec_single(int cpu, struct call_single_data *csd, int wait)
+static int generic_exec_single(int cpu, struct call_single_data *csd,
+ smp_call_func_t func, void *info, int wait)
{
+ struct call_single_data csd_stack = { .flags = 0 };
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+
+ if (cpu == smp_processor_id()) {
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ func(info);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+
+ if ((unsigned)cpu >= nr_cpu_ids || !cpu_online(cpu))
+ return -ENXIO;
+
+
+ if (!csd) {
+ csd = &csd_stack;
+ if (!wait)
+ csd = &__get_cpu_var(csd_data);
+ }
+
+ csd_lock(csd);
+
+ csd->func = func;
+ csd->info = info;
+
if (wait)
csd->flags |= CSD_FLAG_WAIT;
@@ -143,6 +173,8 @@ static void generic_exec_single(int cpu, struct call_single_data *csd, int wait)
if (wait)
csd_lock_wait(csd);
+
+ return 0;
}
/*
@@ -168,8 +200,6 @@ void generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt(void)
}
}
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct call_single_data, csd_data);
-
/*
* smp_call_function_single - Run a function on a specific CPU
* @func: The function to run. This must be fast and non-blocking.
@@ -181,12 +211,8 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct call_single_data, csd_data);
int smp_call_function_single(int cpu, smp_call_func_t func, void *info,
int wait)
{
- struct call_single_data d = {
- .flags = 0,
- };
- unsigned long flags;
int this_cpu;
- int err = 0;
+ int err;
/*
* prevent preemption and reschedule on another processor,
@@ -203,26 +229,7 @@ int smp_call_function_single(int cpu, smp_call_func_t func, void *info,
WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_online(this_cpu) && irqs_disabled()
&& !oops_in_progress);
- if (cpu == this_cpu) {
- local_irq_save(flags);
- func(info);
- local_irq_restore(flags);
- } else {
- if ((unsigned)cpu < nr_cpu_ids && cpu_online(cpu)) {
- struct call_single_data *csd = &d;
-
- if (!wait)
- csd = &__get_cpu_var(csd_data);
-
- csd_lock(csd);
-
- csd->func = func;
- csd->info = info;
- generic_exec_single(cpu, csd, wait);
- } else {
- err = -ENXIO; /* CPU not online */
- }
- }
+ err = generic_exec_single(cpu, NULL, func, info, wait);
put_cpu();
@@ -285,9 +292,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(smp_call_function_any);
*/
int __smp_call_function_single(int cpu, struct call_single_data *csd, int wait)
{
- unsigned int this_cpu;
- unsigned long flags;
int err = 0;
+ int this_cpu;
this_cpu = get_cpu();
/*
@@ -296,20 +302,12 @@ int __smp_call_function_single(int cpu, struct call_single_data *csd, int wait)
* send smp call function interrupt to this cpu and as such deadlocks
* can't happen.
*/
- WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_online(smp_processor_id()) && wait && irqs_disabled()
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_online(this_cpu) && wait && irqs_disabled()
&& !oops_in_progress);
- if (cpu == this_cpu) {
- local_irq_save(flags);
- csd->func(csd->info);
- local_irq_restore(flags);
- } else if ((unsigned)cpu < nr_cpu_ids && cpu_online(cpu)) {
- csd_lock(csd);
- generic_exec_single(cpu, csd, wait);
- } else {
- err = -ENXIO; /* CPU not online */
- }
+ err = generic_exec_single(cpu, csd, csd->func, csd->info, wait);
put_cpu();
+
return err;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__smp_call_function_single);
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-08 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-08 16:18 [RFC PATCH 00/11] smp: Single IPI cleanups Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 01/11] block: Stop abusing csd.list for fifo_time Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 02/11] block: Remove useless IPI struct initialization Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-10 20:21 ` Jan Kara
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 03/11] block: Stop abusing rq->csd.list in blk-softirq Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 04/11] smp: Iterate functions through llist_for_each_entry_safe() Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 05/11] smp: Remove unused list_head from csd Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 06/11] smp: Teach __smp_call_function_single() to check for offline cpus Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2014-02-10 20:27 ` [PATCH 07/11] smp: Consolidate the various smp_call_function_single() declensions Jan Kara
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 08/11] smp: Move __smp_call_function_single() below its safe version Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-10 20:29 ` Jan Kara
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 09/11] watchdog: Simplify a little the IPI call Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-10 12:26 ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-10 14:46 ` Don Zickus
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 10/11] smp: Remove wait argument from __smp_call_function_single() Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-08 16:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 11/11] smp: Enhance and precise the role & requirements of __smp_call_function_single() Frederic Weisbecker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-02-24 15:39 [PATCH 00/11] smp: Single IPI cleanups v2 Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-24 15:39 ` [PATCH 07/11] smp: Consolidate the various smp_call_function_single() declensions Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1391876320-25068-8-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox