From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] watchdog: Simplify a little the IPI call
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:46:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140210144609.GX25953@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1391876320-25068-10-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 05:18:38PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> In order to remotely restart the watchdog hrtimer, update_timers()
> allocates a csd on the stack and pass it to __smp_call_function_single().
>
> There is no partcular need, however, for a specific csd here. Lets
> simplify that a little by calling smp_call_function_single()
> which can already take care of the csd allocation by itself.
Sounds simple enough.
Acked-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
> Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> Cc: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/watchdog.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
> index 4431610..01c6f97 100644
> --- a/kernel/watchdog.c
> +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
> @@ -505,7 +505,6 @@ static void restart_watchdog_hrtimer(void *info)
>
> static void update_timers(int cpu)
> {
> - struct call_single_data data = {.func = restart_watchdog_hrtimer};
> /*
> * Make sure that perf event counter will adopt to a new
> * sampling period. Updating the sampling period directly would
> @@ -515,7 +514,7 @@ static void update_timers(int cpu)
> * might be late already so we have to restart the timer as well.
> */
> watchdog_nmi_disable(cpu);
> - __smp_call_function_single(cpu, &data, 1);
> + smp_call_function_single(cpu, restart_watchdog_hrtimer, NULL, 1);
> watchdog_nmi_enable(cpu);
> }
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-10 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-08 16:18 [RFC PATCH 00/11] smp: Single IPI cleanups Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 01/11] block: Stop abusing csd.list for fifo_time Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 02/11] block: Remove useless IPI struct initialization Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-10 20:21 ` Jan Kara
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 03/11] block: Stop abusing rq->csd.list in blk-softirq Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 04/11] smp: Iterate functions through llist_for_each_entry_safe() Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 05/11] smp: Remove unused list_head from csd Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 06/11] smp: Teach __smp_call_function_single() to check for offline cpus Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 07/11] smp: Consolidate the various smp_call_function_single() declensions Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-10 20:27 ` Jan Kara
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 08/11] smp: Move __smp_call_function_single() below its safe version Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-10 20:29 ` Jan Kara
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 09/11] watchdog: Simplify a little the IPI call Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-10 12:26 ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-10 14:46 ` Don Zickus [this message]
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 10/11] smp: Remove wait argument from __smp_call_function_single() Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-08 16:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 11/11] smp: Enhance and precise the role & requirements of __smp_call_function_single() Frederic Weisbecker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-02-24 15:39 [PATCH 00/11] smp: Single IPI cleanups v2 Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-24 15:40 ` [PATCH 09/11] watchdog: Simplify a little the IPI call Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140210144609.GX25953@redhat.com \
--to=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox