From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] smp: Remove wait argument from __smp_call_function_single()
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 17:46:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140208164633.GA21882@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140208164247.GA11028@infradead.org>
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 08:42:47AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Might be worth to give the function a saner name than just the __-prefix
> if you touch all callers anyway.
>
Good point. How about smp_call_function_single_async() ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-08 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-08 16:18 [RFC PATCH 00/11] smp: Single IPI cleanups Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 01/11] block: Stop abusing csd.list for fifo_time Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 02/11] block: Remove useless IPI struct initialization Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-10 20:21 ` Jan Kara
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 03/11] block: Stop abusing rq->csd.list in blk-softirq Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 04/11] smp: Iterate functions through llist_for_each_entry_safe() Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 05/11] smp: Remove unused list_head from csd Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 06/11] smp: Teach __smp_call_function_single() to check for offline cpus Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 07/11] smp: Consolidate the various smp_call_function_single() declensions Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-10 20:27 ` Jan Kara
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 08/11] smp: Move __smp_call_function_single() below its safe version Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-10 20:29 ` Jan Kara
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 09/11] watchdog: Simplify a little the IPI call Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-10 12:26 ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-10 14:46 ` Don Zickus
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 10/11] smp: Remove wait argument from __smp_call_function_single() Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-08 16:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-08 16:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2014-02-08 16:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-08 16:18 ` [PATCH 11/11] smp: Enhance and precise the role & requirements of __smp_call_function_single() Frederic Weisbecker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-02-24 15:39 [PATCH 00/11] smp: Single IPI cleanups v2 Frederic Weisbecker
2014-02-24 15:40 ` [PATCH 10/11] smp: Remove wait argument from __smp_call_function_single() Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140208164633.GA21882@localhost.localdomain \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox