From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
To: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, eranian@google.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org,
acme@kernel.org, jolsa@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V8 11/14] perf, x86: re-organize code that implicitly enables LBR/PEBS
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 09:54:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1415285671-16894-12-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1415285671-16894-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com>
From: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
make later patch more readable, no logic change.
Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 1fd9492..02be0e4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -395,36 +395,35 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
if (event->attr.precise_ip > precise)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- /*
- * check that PEBS LBR correction does not conflict with
- * whatever the user is asking with attr->branch_sample_type
- */
- if (event->attr.precise_ip > 1 &&
- x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_format < 2) {
- u64 *br_type = &event->attr.branch_sample_type;
-
- if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
- if (!precise_br_compat(event))
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
- /* branch_sample_type is compatible */
-
- } else {
- /*
- * user did not specify branch_sample_type
- *
- * For PEBS fixups, we capture all
- * the branches at the priv level of the
- * event.
- */
- *br_type = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY;
-
- if (!event->attr.exclude_user)
- *br_type |= PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER;
-
- if (!event->attr.exclude_kernel)
- *br_type |= PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL;
- }
+ }
+ /*
+ * check that PEBS LBR correction does not conflict with
+ * whatever the user is asking with attr->branch_sample_type
+ */
+ if (event->attr.precise_ip > 1 && x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_format < 2) {
+ u64 *br_type = &event->attr.branch_sample_type;
+
+ if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
+ if (!precise_br_compat(event))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ /* branch_sample_type is compatible */
+
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * user did not specify branch_sample_type
+ *
+ * For PEBS fixups, we capture all
+ * the branches at the priv level of the
+ * event.
+ */
+ *br_type = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY;
+
+ if (!event->attr.exclude_user)
+ *br_type |= PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER;
+
+ if (!event->attr.exclude_kernel)
+ *br_type |= PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL;
}
}
--
1.8.3.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-06 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-06 14:54 [PATCH V8 00/14] perf, x86: Haswell LBR call stack support (kernel) Kan Liang
2014-11-06 14:54 ` [PATCH V8 01/14] perf, x86: Reduce lbr_sel_map size Kan Liang
2014-11-06 14:54 ` [PATCH V8 02/14] perf, core: introduce pmu context switch callback Kan Liang
2014-11-06 14:54 ` [PATCH V8 03/14] perf, x86: use context switch callback to flush LBR stack Kan Liang
2015-01-14 13:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-14 14:16 ` Liang, Kan
2014-11-06 14:54 ` [PATCH V8 04/14] perf, x86: Basic Haswell LBR call stack support Kan Liang
2014-11-06 14:54 ` [PATCH V8 05/14] perf, core: pmu specific data for perf task context Kan Liang
2014-11-06 14:54 ` [PATCH V8 06/14] perf, core: always switch pmu specific data during context switch Kan Liang
2014-11-06 14:54 ` [PATCH V8 07/14] perf, x86: allocate space for storing LBR stack Kan Liang
2014-11-06 14:54 ` [PATCH V8 08/14] perf, x86: track number of events that use LBR callstack Kan Liang
2014-11-06 14:54 ` [PATCH V8 09/14] perf, x86: Save/resotre LBR stack during context switch Kan Liang
2014-11-06 14:54 ` [PATCH V8 10/14] perf, core: simplify need branch stack check Kan Liang
2014-11-06 14:54 ` Kan Liang [this message]
2014-11-06 14:54 ` [PATCH V8 12/14] perf, x86: disable FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI when LBR operates in callstack mode Kan Liang
2014-11-06 14:54 ` [PATCH V8 13/14] perf, x86: Discard zero length call entries in LBR call stack Kan Liang
2014-11-06 14:54 ` [PATCH V8 14/14] perf, x86: expose LBR callstack to user space tool Kan Liang
2014-11-10 10:13 ` [PATCH V8 00/14] perf, x86: Haswell LBR call stack support (kernel) Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-10 13:54 ` Liang, Kan
2014-11-10 14:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1415285671-16894-12-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox