From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
To: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, eranian@google.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org,
acme@kernel.org, jolsa@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V8 05/14] perf, core: pmu specific data for perf task context
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 09:54:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1415285671-16894-6-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1415285671-16894-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com>
From: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Introduce a new flag PERF_ATTACH_TASK_DATA for perf event's attach
stata. The flag is set by PMU's event_init() callback, it indicates
that perf event needs PMU specific data.
The PMU specific data are initialized to zeros. Later patches will
use PMU specific data to save LBR stack.
Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
---
include/linux/perf_event.h | 6 ++++++
kernel/events/core.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index ed51836..84ec3e6 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -269,6 +269,10 @@ struct pmu {
*/
void (*sched_task) (struct perf_event_context *ctx,
bool sched_in);
+ /*
+ * PMU specific data size
+ */
+ size_t task_ctx_size;
};
@@ -305,6 +309,7 @@ struct swevent_hlist {
#define PERF_ATTACH_CONTEXT 0x01
#define PERF_ATTACH_GROUP 0x02
#define PERF_ATTACH_TASK 0x04
+#define PERF_ATTACH_TASK_DATA 0x08
struct perf_cgroup;
struct ring_buffer;
@@ -514,6 +519,7 @@ struct perf_event_context {
u64 generation;
int pin_count;
int nr_cgroups; /* cgroup evts */
+ void *task_ctx_data; /* pmu specific data */
struct rcu_head rcu_head;
struct delayed_work orphans_remove;
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 9212a2b..08d6671 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -895,6 +895,15 @@ static void get_ctx(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
WARN_ON(!atomic_inc_not_zero(&ctx->refcount));
}
+static void free_ctx(struct rcu_head *head)
+{
+ struct perf_event_context *ctx;
+
+ ctx = container_of(head, struct perf_event_context, rcu_head);
+ kfree(ctx->task_ctx_data);
+ kfree(ctx);
+}
+
static void put_ctx(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
{
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ctx->refcount)) {
@@ -902,7 +911,7 @@ static void put_ctx(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
put_ctx(ctx->parent_ctx);
if (ctx->task)
put_task_struct(ctx->task);
- kfree_rcu(ctx, rcu_head);
+ call_rcu(&ctx->rcu_head, free_ctx);
}
}
@@ -3188,12 +3197,15 @@ errout:
* Returns a matching context with refcount and pincount.
*/
static struct perf_event_context *
-find_get_context(struct pmu *pmu, struct task_struct *task, int cpu)
+find_get_context(struct pmu *pmu, struct task_struct *task,
+ struct perf_event *event)
{
struct perf_event_context *ctx, *clone_ctx = NULL;
struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx;
+ void *task_ctx_data = NULL;
unsigned long flags;
int ctxn, err;
+ int cpu = event->cpu;
if (!task) {
/* Must be root to operate on a CPU event: */
@@ -3221,11 +3233,24 @@ find_get_context(struct pmu *pmu, struct task_struct *task, int cpu)
if (ctxn < 0)
goto errout;
+ if (event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_TASK_DATA) {
+ task_ctx_data = kzalloc(pmu->task_ctx_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!task_ctx_data) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto errout;
+ }
+ }
+
retry:
ctx = perf_lock_task_context(task, ctxn, &flags);
if (ctx) {
clone_ctx = unclone_ctx(ctx);
++ctx->pin_count;
+
+ if (task_ctx_data && !ctx->task_ctx_data) {
+ ctx->task_ctx_data = task_ctx_data;
+ task_ctx_data = NULL;
+ }
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, flags);
if (clone_ctx)
@@ -3236,6 +3261,11 @@ retry:
if (!ctx)
goto errout;
+ if (task_ctx_data) {
+ ctx->task_ctx_data = task_ctx_data;
+ task_ctx_data = NULL;
+ }
+
err = 0;
mutex_lock(&task->perf_event_mutex);
/*
@@ -3262,9 +3292,11 @@ retry:
}
}
+ kfree(task_ctx_data);
return ctx;
errout:
+ kfree(task_ctx_data);
return ERR_PTR(err);
}
@@ -7331,7 +7363,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
/*
* Get the target context (task or percpu):
*/
- ctx = find_get_context(pmu, task, event->cpu);
+ ctx = find_get_context(pmu, task, event);
if (IS_ERR(ctx)) {
err = PTR_ERR(ctx);
goto err_alloc;
@@ -7500,7 +7532,7 @@ perf_event_create_kernel_counter(struct perf_event_attr *attr, int cpu,
account_event(event);
- ctx = find_get_context(event->pmu, task, cpu);
+ ctx = find_get_context(event->pmu, task, event);
if (IS_ERR(ctx)) {
err = PTR_ERR(ctx);
goto err_free;
--
1.8.3.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-06 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-06 14:54 [PATCH V8 00/14] perf, x86: Haswell LBR call stack support (kernel) Kan Liang
2014-11-06 14:54 ` [PATCH V8 01/14] perf, x86: Reduce lbr_sel_map size Kan Liang
2014-11-06 14:54 ` [PATCH V8 02/14] perf, core: introduce pmu context switch callback Kan Liang
2014-11-06 14:54 ` [PATCH V8 03/14] perf, x86: use context switch callback to flush LBR stack Kan Liang
2015-01-14 13:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-14 14:16 ` Liang, Kan
2014-11-06 14:54 ` [PATCH V8 04/14] perf, x86: Basic Haswell LBR call stack support Kan Liang
2014-11-06 14:54 ` Kan Liang [this message]
2014-11-06 14:54 ` [PATCH V8 06/14] perf, core: always switch pmu specific data during context switch Kan Liang
2014-11-06 14:54 ` [PATCH V8 07/14] perf, x86: allocate space for storing LBR stack Kan Liang
2014-11-06 14:54 ` [PATCH V8 08/14] perf, x86: track number of events that use LBR callstack Kan Liang
2014-11-06 14:54 ` [PATCH V8 09/14] perf, x86: Save/resotre LBR stack during context switch Kan Liang
2014-11-06 14:54 ` [PATCH V8 10/14] perf, core: simplify need branch stack check Kan Liang
2014-11-06 14:54 ` [PATCH V8 11/14] perf, x86: re-organize code that implicitly enables LBR/PEBS Kan Liang
2014-11-06 14:54 ` [PATCH V8 12/14] perf, x86: disable FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI when LBR operates in callstack mode Kan Liang
2014-11-06 14:54 ` [PATCH V8 13/14] perf, x86: Discard zero length call entries in LBR call stack Kan Liang
2014-11-06 14:54 ` [PATCH V8 14/14] perf, x86: expose LBR callstack to user space tool Kan Liang
2014-11-10 10:13 ` [PATCH V8 00/14] perf, x86: Haswell LBR call stack support (kernel) Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-10 13:54 ` Liang, Kan
2014-11-10 14:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1415285671-16894-6-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox