* napi backport to 2.4? @ 2002-06-16 22:56 dank 2002-06-16 23:10 ` Jeff Garzik 2002-06-17 5:26 ` David S. Miller 0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: dank @ 2002-06-16 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org How hard would it be to backport napi to 2.4? There were a few rumblings about that last year... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: napi backport to 2.4? 2002-06-16 22:56 napi backport to 2.4? dank @ 2002-06-16 23:10 ` Jeff Garzik 2002-06-17 5:26 ` David S. Miller 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Jeff Garzik @ 2002-06-16 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dank; +Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David S. Miller dank@kegel.com wrote: > How hard would it be to backport napi to 2.4? > There were a few rumblings about that last year... Unless DaveM's plans have changed, it should be in 2.4.20. Jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: napi backport to 2.4? 2002-06-16 22:56 napi backport to 2.4? dank 2002-06-16 23:10 ` Jeff Garzik @ 2002-06-17 5:26 ` David S. Miller 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: David S. Miller @ 2002-06-17 5:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dank; +Cc: linux-kernel From: dank@kegel.com Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 15:56:42 -0700 How hard would it be to backport napi to 2.4? There were a few rumblings about that last year... I'll probably do it for 2.4.21 or some time around then... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-06-17 5:31 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2002-06-16 22:56 napi backport to 2.4? dank 2002-06-16 23:10 ` Jeff Garzik 2002-06-17 5:26 ` David S. Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox