* napi backport to 2.4?
@ 2002-06-16 22:56 dank
2002-06-16 23:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-06-17 5:26 ` David S. Miller
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: dank @ 2002-06-16 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
How hard would it be to backport napi to 2.4?
There were a few rumblings about that last year...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: napi backport to 2.4?
2002-06-16 22:56 napi backport to 2.4? dank
@ 2002-06-16 23:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-06-17 5:26 ` David S. Miller
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2002-06-16 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dank; +Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David S. Miller
dank@kegel.com wrote:
> How hard would it be to backport napi to 2.4?
> There were a few rumblings about that last year...
Unless DaveM's plans have changed, it should be in 2.4.20.
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: napi backport to 2.4?
2002-06-16 22:56 napi backport to 2.4? dank
2002-06-16 23:10 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2002-06-17 5:26 ` David S. Miller
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2002-06-17 5:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dank; +Cc: linux-kernel
From: dank@kegel.com
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 15:56:42 -0700
How hard would it be to backport napi to 2.4?
There were a few rumblings about that last year...
I'll probably do it for 2.4.21 or some time around then...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-06-17 5:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-06-16 22:56 napi backport to 2.4? dank
2002-06-16 23:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-06-17 5:26 ` David S. Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox