!CONFIG_MMU stubs in 2.5.66

!CONFIG_MMU stubs in 2.5.66

[Miles Bader]

The following change in 2.5.66:

   [PATCH] a few missing stubs for !CONFIG_MMU

   Patch from Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

   This is from the uClinux patches - there are a few more stubs needed
   in nommu.c to get the mmuless plattforms working.

Adds definitions for vmalloc_to_page, follow_page, and remap_page_range,
to mm/mmnommu.c.  However, there are already inline definitions of those
functions (predicated on !CONFIG_MMU) in linux/mm.h, so compilation
fails.

Which is the correct location?

[I locally removed the defs in linux/mm.h to get things to compile]

Thanks,

-Miles
-- 
[|nurgle|]  ddt- demonic? so quake will have an evil kinda setting? one that 
            will  make every christian in the world foamm at the mouth? 
[iddt]      nurg, that's the goal 

Re: !CONFIG_MMU stubs in 2.5.66

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 01:20:16PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> The following change in 2.5.66:
> 
>    [PATCH] a few missing stubs for !CONFIG_MMU
> 
>    Patch from Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> 
>    This is from the uClinux patches - there are a few more stubs needed
>    in nommu.c to get the mmuless plattforms working.
> 
> Adds definitions for vmalloc_to_page, follow_page, and remap_page_range,
> to mm/mmnommu.c.  However, there are already inline definitions of those
> functions (predicated on !CONFIG_MMU) in linux/mm.h, so compilation
> fails.
> 
> Which is the correct location?

OOPS, it looks like Greg & me submitted paches in parallel.  Personally I
prefer the out of line ones over the inlines, especially as they handle
vmalloc_to_page properly.  I'll submit a patch to Linus to fix this
mess.