From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
pwil3058@bigpond.net.au, efault@gmx.de, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au,
mingo@elte.hu, kernel@kolivas.org, kenneth.w.chen@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] smpnice: don't consider sched groups which are lightly loaded for balancing
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:25:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060420172553.A12394@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060420164936.5988460d.akpm@osdl.org>; from akpm@osdl.org on Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 04:49:36PM -0700
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 04:49:36PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > updated patch appended. thanks.
>
> Where are we up to with smpnice now? Are there still any known
> regressions/problems/bugs/etc? Has sufficient testing been done for us to
> know this?
Based on the code review, so far I have been giving load balancing examples
which break. Peter is also plannning to fix outstanding issues which are open.
In the coming days, we are planning to run some benchmarks.
Nick, it will be great if you can review and provide your feedback.
thanks,
suresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-21 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-28 6:00 [PATCH] sched: smpnice work around for active_load_balance() Peter Williams
2006-03-28 19:25 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-03-28 22:44 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-29 2:14 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-29 2:52 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-03-29 3:42 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-29 22:52 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-03-29 23:40 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-30 0:50 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-03-30 1:14 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-02 4:48 ` smpnice loadbalancing with high priority tasks Siddha, Suresh B
2006-04-02 7:08 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-04 0:24 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-04-04 1:22 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-04 1:34 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-04 2:11 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-04-04 3:24 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-04 4:34 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-06 2:14 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-20 1:24 ` [patch] smpnice: don't consider sched groups which are lightly loaded for balancing Siddha, Suresh B
2006-04-20 5:19 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-20 16:54 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-04-20 23:11 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-20 23:49 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-21 0:25 ` Siddha, Suresh B [this message]
2006-04-21 0:28 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-21 1:25 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-20 17:04 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-04-21 0:00 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-03 1:04 ` [PATCH] sched: smpnice work around for active_load_balance() Peter Williams
2006-04-03 16:57 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-04-03 23:11 ` Peter Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060420172553.A12394@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox