From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: pwil3058@bigpond.net.au, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
efault@gmx.de, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, mingo@elte.hu,
kernel@kolivas.org, kenneth.w.chen@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] smpnice: don't consider sched groups which are lightly loaded for balancing
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:49:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060420164936.5988460d.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060420095408.A10267@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> wrote:
>
> updated patch appended. thanks.
Where are we up to with smpnice now? Are there still any known
regressions/problems/bugs/etc? Has sufficient testing been done for us to
know this?
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-20 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-28 6:00 [PATCH] sched: smpnice work around for active_load_balance() Peter Williams
2006-03-28 19:25 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-03-28 22:44 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-29 2:14 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-29 2:52 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-03-29 3:42 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-29 22:52 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-03-29 23:40 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-30 0:50 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-03-30 1:14 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-02 4:48 ` smpnice loadbalancing with high priority tasks Siddha, Suresh B
2006-04-02 7:08 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-04 0:24 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-04-04 1:22 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-04 1:34 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-04 2:11 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-04-04 3:24 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-04 4:34 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-06 2:14 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-20 1:24 ` [patch] smpnice: don't consider sched groups which are lightly loaded for balancing Siddha, Suresh B
2006-04-20 5:19 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-20 16:54 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-04-20 23:11 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-20 23:49 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-04-21 0:25 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-04-21 0:28 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-21 1:25 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-20 17:04 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-04-21 0:00 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-03 1:04 ` [PATCH] sched: smpnice work around for active_load_balance() Peter Williams
2006-04-03 16:57 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-04-03 23:11 ` Peter Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060420164936.5988460d.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox