Re: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:

> Ingo, why the heck is this hiding under arch/x86/ and not in 
> lib/Kconfig.debug where it belongs?
> 
>     x86: add optimized inlining
> 
> If there are platforms that can't handle it, we can add a conditional 
> to lib/Kconfig.debug, but by default it should be made available 
> generically.
>
> Where did this original patch get posted for review and discussion?
> 
> Tell me where!?!?!

here, two months ago:

  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/3/122

i made it x86-only due to this FUD that went against it:

  "messing with a global #define in a way that the results on 24 
   architectures with 7 different releases of gcc would be 
   unpredictable."

... as i saw no reason why this feature, which i found rather useful, 
should be delayed another year or so. I'd be more than happy to promote 
this feature back to lib/Kconfig.debug, sparc64 interest would make that 
a strong argument.

and here is the pull request that i posted to lkml, with the full patch 
included as well:

  http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/911104?page=last

> The only references I see is where Stephen Rothwell complained that it 
> broke the powerpc build, and then on the git commit list when Linus 
> sucked this crud in.

i think there must something wrong about your lkml feed.

	Ingo