From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel Hecht <dhecht@vmware.com>, Tim Mann <mann@vmware.com>,
Zach Amsden <zach@vmware.com>, Sahil Rihan <srihan@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86:Use cpu_khz for loops_per_jiffy calculation
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:57:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080624175753.GG5642@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1213999593.31598.52.camel@promb-2n-dhcp368.eng.vmware.com>
Hi!
> On X86 platform we can use the value of tsc_khz computed during tsc calibration
> to calculate the loops_per_jiffy value. Its very important to keep the error in
> lpj values to minimum as any error in that may result in kernel panic in
> check_timer.
> In virtualization environment, On a highly overloaded host the guest delay
> calibration may sometimes result in errors beyond the ~50% that timer_irq_works
> can handle, resulting in the guest panicking.
How did you adress 'khz has nothing to do with loops per jiffie'
comment?
Some cpus can do loop in cycle , some need two cycles, some need half.
Pavel
> @@ -421,6 +422,10 @@
> return;
> }
>
> + lpj = ((u64)tsc_khz * 1000);
> + do_div(lpj, HZ);
> + lpj_tsc = lpj;
> +
> printk("Detected %lu.%03lu MHz processor.\n",
> (unsigned long)cpu_khz / 1000,
> (unsigned long)cpu_khz % 1000);
>
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-26 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-04 0:41 [RFC PATCH] x86:Use cpu_khz for loops_per_jiffy calculation Alok Kataria
2008-06-04 1:20 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-06-04 4:01 ` Alok kataria
2008-06-04 13:16 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-06-05 18:37 ` Alok Kataria
2008-06-20 1:22 ` Alok Kataria
2008-06-20 11:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-20 22:06 ` Alok Kataria
2008-06-23 20:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-23 23:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-23 23:34 ` Alok Kataria
2008-06-23 23:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-24 1:21 ` Alok Kataria
2008-06-24 11:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-24 17:57 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2008-06-26 17:20 ` Alok Kataria
2008-06-26 17:35 ` Pavel Machek
2008-06-26 18:10 ` Alok Kataria
2008-06-26 22:16 ` Pavel Machek
2008-06-26 23:10 ` Alok Kataria
2008-06-27 8:12 ` Pavel Machek
2008-06-04 14:17 ` Pavel Machek
2008-06-09 13:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-09 17:55 ` Alok Kataria
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080624175753.GG5642@ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=akataria@vmware.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=dhecht@vmware.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mann@vmware.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=srihan@vmware.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zach@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox