From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86:Use cpu_khz for loops_per_jiffy calculation
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:35:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080626173536.GA16783@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1214500831.3351.10.camel@promb-2n-dhcp368.eng.vmware.com>
On Thu 2008-06-26 10:20:31, Alok Kataria wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 10:57 -0700, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > On X86 platform we can use the value of tsc_khz computed during tsc calibration
> > > to calculate the loops_per_jiffy value. Its very important to keep the error in
> > > lpj values to minimum as any error in that may result in kernel panic in
> > > check_timer.
> > > In virtualization environment, On a highly overloaded host the guest delay
> > > calibration may sometimes result in errors beyond the ~50% that timer_irq_works
> > > can handle, resulting in the guest panicking.
> >
> > How did you adress 'khz has nothing to do with loops per jiffie'
> > comment?
> >
> > Some cpus can do loop in cycle , some need two cycles, some need half.
>
> Hi Pavel,
>
> When you say loops per jiffies has nothing to do with khz, by khz you
> mean the cpu frequency, right ?
Yes.
> AFAIU in calibrate_delay_direct too we measure the amount by which timer
> has ticked until DELAY_CALIBRATION_TICKS amount of jiffies has passed.
> So IMO the code there too assumes that there is one loop per timer
> cycle ?
On my machine, it reports:
delay using timer specific routine.. 3661.98 BogoMIPS (lpj=7323971)
...
Detected 1828.828 MHz processor.
(/proc/cpuinfo)
model name : Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2400 @ 1.83GHz
...
cpu MHz : 1000.000
...
bogomips : 3657.54
So you'd break it by setting lpj (aka bogomips) to cpu_khz, right?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-26 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-04 0:41 [RFC PATCH] x86:Use cpu_khz for loops_per_jiffy calculation Alok Kataria
2008-06-04 1:20 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-06-04 4:01 ` Alok kataria
2008-06-04 13:16 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-06-05 18:37 ` Alok Kataria
2008-06-20 1:22 ` Alok Kataria
2008-06-20 11:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-20 22:06 ` Alok Kataria
2008-06-23 20:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-23 23:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-23 23:34 ` Alok Kataria
2008-06-23 23:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-24 1:21 ` Alok Kataria
2008-06-24 11:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-24 17:57 ` Pavel Machek
2008-06-26 17:20 ` Alok Kataria
2008-06-26 17:35 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2008-06-26 18:10 ` Alok Kataria
2008-06-26 22:16 ` Pavel Machek
2008-06-26 23:10 ` Alok Kataria
2008-06-27 8:12 ` Pavel Machek
2008-06-04 14:17 ` Pavel Machek
2008-06-09 13:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-09 17:55 ` Alok Kataria
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080626173536.GA16783@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=akataria@vmware.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox