From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Prasad <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC GIT PULL] hw-breakpoints: Rewrite on top of perf counters
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:24:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090910182405.GA6421@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19112.53364.51476.9036@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 08:09:56PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Frederic Weisbecker writes:
>
> > This is a rewrite of the hardware breakpoints on top of perf counters.
>
> On powerpc, it doesn't build. I get:
>
> CC kernel/perf_counter.o
> kernel/perf_counter.c:31:31: error: asm/hw_breakpoint.h: No such file or directory
> kernel/perf_counter.c: In function 'bp_perf_counter_init':
> kernel/perf_counter.c:3964: error: implicit declaration of function 'register_perf_hw_breakpoint'
> kernel/perf_counter.c:3966: error: implicit declaration of function '__register_perf_hw_breakpoint'
> kernel/perf_counter.c:3968: error: 'perf_ops_bp' undeclared (first use in this function)
> kernel/perf_counter.c:3968: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> kernel/perf_counter.c:3968: error: for each function it appears in.)
> make[2]: *** [kernel/perf_counter.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [kernel] Error 2
> make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
>
> Seems like every architecture now needs an asm/hw_breakpoint.h. What
> is the minimum required in that file? Looks like we would require a
> perf_ops_bp, at least.
>
> Could you please either arrange things so that architectures that
> don't have hardware breakpoints hooked up to perf_counters don't need
> an asm/hw_breakpoint.h, or add minimal versions of that file for every
> architecture, so as not to break bisection unnecessarily?
>
> Paul.
I focused so much on the breakpoint <- perf dependency that I've even
forgotten the opposite dependency :)
I'll fix it in the 3rd patch.
We have an <asm-generic/hw-breakpoint.h> so I can just add an
#ifdef HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT on its top.
Also I'll export the various breakpoints api dependant out of
kernel/perf_counter.c and provide stubs for the off-case.
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-10 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-10 8:29 [RFC GIT PULL] hw-breakpoints: Rewrite on top of perf counters Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 8:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf_counter: Add open/close pmu callbacks Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 11:22 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-09-10 18:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 8:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf_counter: Export various perf helpers for external users Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 11:28 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-09-10 18:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 8:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] hw-breakpoints: Rewrite the hw-breakpoints layer on top of perf counters Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 14:25 ` K.Prasad
2009-09-10 18:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 21:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-14 21:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-14 17:17 ` K.Prasad
2009-09-14 21:33 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-11 22:09 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-09-14 3:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-14 6:24 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-09-14 18:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-14 17:28 ` K.Prasad
2009-09-14 21:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 8:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] hw-breakpoints: Arbitrate access to pmu following registers constraints Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 14:41 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-10 14:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-10 14:59 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-10 15:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-09-10 18:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 8:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] ksym_tracer: Remove KSYM_SELFTEST_ENTRY Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 10:09 ` [RFC GIT PULL] hw-breakpoints: Rewrite on top of perf counters Paul Mackerras
2009-09-10 17:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-10 18:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090910182405.GA6421@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox