From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Prasad <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf_counter: Add open/close pmu callbacks
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:46:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090910184621.GC6421@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19112.57690.867979.462172@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:22:02PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Frederic Weisbecker writes:
>
> > Add the open() and close() callback to the pmu structure.
> > Open is called when a counter is initialized just after it's allocation
> > and close is called when the counter is about to be released.
> >
> > These callbacks are useful for example when a pmu has to deal with
> > several registers and needs to maintain an internal list of counters
> > using them. Given such list, the pmu is able to check if the the number
> > of physical registers are still sufficient for the new created counter
> > and then accept or refuse this counter.
>
> We already do that sort of thing on powerpc for hardware counters.
>
> It looks to me that you can easily do that stuff in the appropriate
> xxx_perf_counter_init function, since pmu->open() is only called
> immediately on return from one the various xxx_perf_counter_init
> functions, and xxx_perf_counter_init is what says what pmu struct to
> use.
>
> As for ->close(), that's what counter->destroy is there for. On
> powerpc, hw_perf_counter_init sets counter->destroy to an appropriate
> destructor function, as does tp_perf_counter_init. So if you need a
> destructor for breakpoint counters, just make bp_perf_counter_init set
> counter->destroy appropriately.
>
> Paul.
Right. pmu->open/close is basically a mirror of *_perf_counter_init()
and counter->destroy() but in the pmu layer.
As you prefer I can indeed remove that, the end-result looks a bit
confusing to me too.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-10 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-10 8:29 [RFC GIT PULL] hw-breakpoints: Rewrite on top of perf counters Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 8:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf_counter: Add open/close pmu callbacks Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 11:22 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-09-10 18:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2009-09-10 8:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf_counter: Export various perf helpers for external users Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 11:28 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-09-10 18:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 8:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] hw-breakpoints: Rewrite the hw-breakpoints layer on top of perf counters Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 14:25 ` K.Prasad
2009-09-10 18:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 21:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-14 21:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-14 17:17 ` K.Prasad
2009-09-14 21:33 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-11 22:09 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-09-14 3:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-14 6:24 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-09-14 18:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-14 17:28 ` K.Prasad
2009-09-14 21:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 8:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] hw-breakpoints: Arbitrate access to pmu following registers constraints Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 14:41 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-10 14:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-10 14:59 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-10 15:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-09-10 18:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 8:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] ksym_tracer: Remove KSYM_SELFTEST_ENTRY Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 10:09 ` [RFC GIT PULL] hw-breakpoints: Rewrite on top of perf counters Paul Mackerras
2009-09-10 17:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-10 18:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090910184621.GC6421@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox