public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Cc: autofs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] autofs4: avoid taking fs_lock during rcu-walk
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 09:41:14 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140709234114.4525.24652.stgit@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140709233541.4525.25151.stgit@notabene.brown>

->fs_lock protects AUTOFS_INF_EXPIRING.  We need to be sure
that once the flag is set, no new references beneath the dentry
are taken.  So rcu-walk currently needs to take fs_lock before
checking the flag.  This hurts performance.

Change the expiry to a two-stage process.
First set AUTHFS_INF_NO_RCU which forces any path walk into
ref-walk mode, then drop the lock and call synchronize_rcu().
Once that returns we can be sure no rcu-walk is active beneath
the dentry and we can check reference counts again.

Now during an RCU-walk we can test AUTHFS_INF_EXPIRING without
taking the lock as along as we test AUTHFS_INF_NO_RCU too.
If either are set, we must abort the RCU-walk
If neither are set, we know that refcounts will be tested again
after we finish the RCU-walk so we are safe to continue.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
 fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h |    4 ++++
 fs/autofs4/expire.c   |   46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h b/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
index 99dbb05d6148..469724d7568c 100644
--- a/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
+++ b/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
@@ -79,6 +79,10 @@ struct autofs_info {
 };
 
 #define AUTOFS_INF_EXPIRING	(1<<0) /* dentry is in the process of expiring */
+#define AUTOFS_INF_NO_RCU	(1<<1) /* the dentry is being considered
+					* for expiry, so RCU_walk is
+					* not permitted
+					*/
 #define AUTOFS_INF_PENDING	(1<<2) /* dentry pending mount */
 
 struct autofs_wait_queue {
diff --git a/fs/autofs4/expire.c b/fs/autofs4/expire.c
index fb0b5003353f..98a6fd4957f8 100644
--- a/fs/autofs4/expire.c
+++ b/fs/autofs4/expire.c
@@ -333,10 +333,19 @@ struct dentry *autofs4_expire_direct(struct super_block *sb,
 	if (ino->flags & AUTOFS_INF_PENDING)
 		goto out;
 	if (!autofs4_direct_busy(mnt, root, timeout, do_now)) {
-		ino->flags |= AUTOFS_INF_EXPIRING;
-		init_completion(&ino->expire_complete);
+		ino->flags |= AUTOFS_INF_NO_RCU;
 		spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
-		return root;
+		synchronize_rcu();
+		spin_lock(&sbi->fs_lock);
+		if (!autofs4_direct_busy(mnt, root, timeout, do_now)) {
+			ino->flags |= AUTOFS_INF_EXPIRING;
+			smp_mb()
+			ino->flags &= ~AUTOFS_INF_NO_RCU;
+			init_completion(&ino->expire_complete);
+			spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
+			return root;
+		}
+		ino->flags &= ~AUTOFS_INF_NO_RCU;
 	}
 out:
 	spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
@@ -445,12 +454,29 @@ struct dentry *autofs4_expire_indirect(struct super_block *sb,
 	dentry = NULL;
 	while ((dentry = get_next_positive_subdir(dentry, root))) {
 		spin_lock(&sbi->fs_lock);
-		expired = should_expire(dentry, mnt, timeout, how);
-		if (expired) {
+		ino = autofs4_dentry_ino(dentry);
+		if (ino->flags & AUTOFS_INF_NO_RCU)
+			expired = NULL;
+		else
+			expired = should_expire(dentry, mnt, timeout, how);
+		if (!expired) {
+			spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
+			continue;
+		}
+		ino = autofs4_dentry_ino(expired);
+		ino->flags |= AUTOFS_INF_NO_RCU;
+		spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
+		synchronize_rcu();
+		spin_lock(&sbi->fs_lock);
+		if (should_expire(expired, mnt, timeout, how)) {
 			if (expired != dentry)
 				dput(dentry);
 			goto found;
 		}
+
+		ino->flags &= ~AUTOFS_INF_NO_RCU;
+		if (expired != dentry)
+			dput(expired);
 		spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
 	}
 	return NULL;
@@ -458,8 +484,9 @@ struct dentry *autofs4_expire_indirect(struct super_block *sb,
 found:
 	DPRINTK("returning %p %.*s",
 		expired, (int)expired->d_name.len, expired->d_name.name);
-	ino = autofs4_dentry_ino(expired);
 	ino->flags |= AUTOFS_INF_EXPIRING;
+	smp_mb()
+	ino->flags &= ~AUTOFS_INF_NO_RCU;
 	init_completion(&ino->expire_complete);
 	spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
 	spin_lock(&sbi->lookup_lock);
@@ -479,11 +506,14 @@ int autofs4_expire_wait(struct dentry *dentry, int rcu_walk)
 	int status;
 
 	/* Block on any pending expire */
+	if (!(ino->flags & (AUTOFS_INF_EXPIRING | AUTOFS_INF_NO_RCU)))
+		return 0;
+
+	if (rcu_walk)
+		return -ECHILD;
 	spin_lock(&sbi->fs_lock);
 	if (ino->flags & AUTOFS_INF_EXPIRING) {
 		spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
-		if (rcu_walk)
-			return -ECHILD;
 
 		DPRINTK("waiting for expire %p name=%.*s",
 			 dentry, dentry->d_name.len, dentry->d_name.name);



  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-07-09 23:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-09 23:41 [PATCH 0/6] autofs4: support RCU-walk NeilBrown
2014-07-09 23:41 ` [PATCH 6/6] autofs4: don't take spinlock when not needed in autofs4_lookup_expiring NeilBrown
2014-07-16  3:42   ` Ian Kent
2014-07-16  6:10     ` NeilBrown
2014-07-09 23:41 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2014-07-16  9:52   ` [PATCH 5/6] autofs4: avoid taking fs_lock during rcu-walk Ian Kent
2014-07-09 23:41 ` [PATCH 2/6] autofs4: remove a redundant assignment NeilBrown
2014-07-16  3:27   ` Ian Kent
2014-07-09 23:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] autofs4: remove unused autofs4_ispending() NeilBrown
2014-07-16  3:26   ` Ian Kent
2014-07-09 23:41 ` [PATCH 4/6] autofs4: factor should_expire() out of autofs4_expire_indirect NeilBrown
2014-07-14  0:53   ` [PATCH 4/6 v2] " NeilBrown
2014-07-15  3:48     ` Ian Kent
2014-07-15  4:05       ` NeilBrown
2014-07-15  7:44         ` Ian Kent
2014-07-16  7:50     ` Ian Kent
2014-07-17  4:34       ` NeilBrown
2014-07-09 23:41 ` [PATCH 3/6] autofs4: allow RCU-walk to walk through autofs4 NeilBrown
2014-07-16  4:44   ` Ian Kent
2014-07-16  5:51     ` NeilBrown
2014-07-16  6:56       ` Ian Kent
2014-07-17  5:00         ` Ian Kent
2014-07-17  8:04           ` NeilBrown
2014-07-17 10:17             ` Ian Kent
2014-07-29  1:51               ` NeilBrown
2014-07-29  6:37                 ` Ian Kent
2014-07-10  7:43 ` [PATCH 0/6] autofs4: support RCU-walk Ian Kent
2014-07-10  7:45   ` Ian Kent
2014-07-10  8:25   ` NeilBrown
2014-07-11  2:49     ` Ian Kent
2014-07-16  3:24 ` Ian Kent
2014-07-16  6:00   ` NeilBrown
2014-07-16  7:21     ` Ian Kent

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140709234114.4525.24652.stgit@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=autofs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=raven@themaw.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox