From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Cc: autofs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] autofs4: avoid taking fs_lock during rcu-walk
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 09:41:14 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140709234114.4525.24652.stgit@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140709233541.4525.25151.stgit@notabene.brown>
->fs_lock protects AUTOFS_INF_EXPIRING. We need to be sure
that once the flag is set, no new references beneath the dentry
are taken. So rcu-walk currently needs to take fs_lock before
checking the flag. This hurts performance.
Change the expiry to a two-stage process.
First set AUTHFS_INF_NO_RCU which forces any path walk into
ref-walk mode, then drop the lock and call synchronize_rcu().
Once that returns we can be sure no rcu-walk is active beneath
the dentry and we can check reference counts again.
Now during an RCU-walk we can test AUTHFS_INF_EXPIRING without
taking the lock as along as we test AUTHFS_INF_NO_RCU too.
If either are set, we must abort the RCU-walk
If neither are set, we know that refcounts will be tested again
after we finish the RCU-walk so we are safe to continue.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h | 4 ++++
fs/autofs4/expire.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h b/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
index 99dbb05d6148..469724d7568c 100644
--- a/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
+++ b/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
@@ -79,6 +79,10 @@ struct autofs_info {
};
#define AUTOFS_INF_EXPIRING (1<<0) /* dentry is in the process of expiring */
+#define AUTOFS_INF_NO_RCU (1<<1) /* the dentry is being considered
+ * for expiry, so RCU_walk is
+ * not permitted
+ */
#define AUTOFS_INF_PENDING (1<<2) /* dentry pending mount */
struct autofs_wait_queue {
diff --git a/fs/autofs4/expire.c b/fs/autofs4/expire.c
index fb0b5003353f..98a6fd4957f8 100644
--- a/fs/autofs4/expire.c
+++ b/fs/autofs4/expire.c
@@ -333,10 +333,19 @@ struct dentry *autofs4_expire_direct(struct super_block *sb,
if (ino->flags & AUTOFS_INF_PENDING)
goto out;
if (!autofs4_direct_busy(mnt, root, timeout, do_now)) {
- ino->flags |= AUTOFS_INF_EXPIRING;
- init_completion(&ino->expire_complete);
+ ino->flags |= AUTOFS_INF_NO_RCU;
spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
- return root;
+ synchronize_rcu();
+ spin_lock(&sbi->fs_lock);
+ if (!autofs4_direct_busy(mnt, root, timeout, do_now)) {
+ ino->flags |= AUTOFS_INF_EXPIRING;
+ smp_mb()
+ ino->flags &= ~AUTOFS_INF_NO_RCU;
+ init_completion(&ino->expire_complete);
+ spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
+ return root;
+ }
+ ino->flags &= ~AUTOFS_INF_NO_RCU;
}
out:
spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
@@ -445,12 +454,29 @@ struct dentry *autofs4_expire_indirect(struct super_block *sb,
dentry = NULL;
while ((dentry = get_next_positive_subdir(dentry, root))) {
spin_lock(&sbi->fs_lock);
- expired = should_expire(dentry, mnt, timeout, how);
- if (expired) {
+ ino = autofs4_dentry_ino(dentry);
+ if (ino->flags & AUTOFS_INF_NO_RCU)
+ expired = NULL;
+ else
+ expired = should_expire(dentry, mnt, timeout, how);
+ if (!expired) {
+ spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
+ continue;
+ }
+ ino = autofs4_dentry_ino(expired);
+ ino->flags |= AUTOFS_INF_NO_RCU;
+ spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
+ synchronize_rcu();
+ spin_lock(&sbi->fs_lock);
+ if (should_expire(expired, mnt, timeout, how)) {
if (expired != dentry)
dput(dentry);
goto found;
}
+
+ ino->flags &= ~AUTOFS_INF_NO_RCU;
+ if (expired != dentry)
+ dput(expired);
spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
}
return NULL;
@@ -458,8 +484,9 @@ struct dentry *autofs4_expire_indirect(struct super_block *sb,
found:
DPRINTK("returning %p %.*s",
expired, (int)expired->d_name.len, expired->d_name.name);
- ino = autofs4_dentry_ino(expired);
ino->flags |= AUTOFS_INF_EXPIRING;
+ smp_mb()
+ ino->flags &= ~AUTOFS_INF_NO_RCU;
init_completion(&ino->expire_complete);
spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
spin_lock(&sbi->lookup_lock);
@@ -479,11 +506,14 @@ int autofs4_expire_wait(struct dentry *dentry, int rcu_walk)
int status;
/* Block on any pending expire */
+ if (!(ino->flags & (AUTOFS_INF_EXPIRING | AUTOFS_INF_NO_RCU)))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (rcu_walk)
+ return -ECHILD;
spin_lock(&sbi->fs_lock);
if (ino->flags & AUTOFS_INF_EXPIRING) {
spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
- if (rcu_walk)
- return -ECHILD;
DPRINTK("waiting for expire %p name=%.*s",
dentry, dentry->d_name.len, dentry->d_name.name);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-09 23:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-09 23:41 [PATCH 0/6] autofs4: support RCU-walk NeilBrown
2014-07-09 23:41 ` [PATCH 6/6] autofs4: don't take spinlock when not needed in autofs4_lookup_expiring NeilBrown
2014-07-16 3:42 ` Ian Kent
2014-07-16 6:10 ` NeilBrown
2014-07-09 23:41 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2014-07-16 9:52 ` [PATCH 5/6] autofs4: avoid taking fs_lock during rcu-walk Ian Kent
2014-07-09 23:41 ` [PATCH 2/6] autofs4: remove a redundant assignment NeilBrown
2014-07-16 3:27 ` Ian Kent
2014-07-09 23:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] autofs4: remove unused autofs4_ispending() NeilBrown
2014-07-16 3:26 ` Ian Kent
2014-07-09 23:41 ` [PATCH 4/6] autofs4: factor should_expire() out of autofs4_expire_indirect NeilBrown
2014-07-14 0:53 ` [PATCH 4/6 v2] " NeilBrown
2014-07-15 3:48 ` Ian Kent
2014-07-15 4:05 ` NeilBrown
2014-07-15 7:44 ` Ian Kent
2014-07-16 7:50 ` Ian Kent
2014-07-17 4:34 ` NeilBrown
2014-07-09 23:41 ` [PATCH 3/6] autofs4: allow RCU-walk to walk through autofs4 NeilBrown
2014-07-16 4:44 ` Ian Kent
2014-07-16 5:51 ` NeilBrown
2014-07-16 6:56 ` Ian Kent
2014-07-17 5:00 ` Ian Kent
2014-07-17 8:04 ` NeilBrown
2014-07-17 10:17 ` Ian Kent
2014-07-29 1:51 ` NeilBrown
2014-07-29 6:37 ` Ian Kent
2014-07-10 7:43 ` [PATCH 0/6] autofs4: support RCU-walk Ian Kent
2014-07-10 7:45 ` Ian Kent
2014-07-10 8:25 ` NeilBrown
2014-07-11 2:49 ` Ian Kent
2014-07-16 3:24 ` Ian Kent
2014-07-16 6:00 ` NeilBrown
2014-07-16 7:21 ` Ian Kent
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140709234114.4525.24652.stgit@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=autofs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox