* [PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() isn't a static function anymore
@ 2015-09-15 8:10 Viresh Kumar
2015-09-15 8:14 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2015-09-15 8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael Wysocki
Cc: linaro-kernel, linux-pm, Thomas Gleixner, alexandra.yates,
Viresh Kumar, open list
Its used outside of the core file and is exported as well. Drop the
'static' keyword from its declaration and fix below build error:
linux/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:241:31: error: static declaration of
'cpufreq_cpu_get_raw' follows non-static declaration
Fixes: 503655f70d9b ("cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Use cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() in ->get()")
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index a8252bb0f80c..ef5ed9470de9 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ int cpufreq_generic_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_generic_init);
-static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(unsigned int cpu)
+struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
--
2.4.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() isn't a static function anymore
2015-09-15 8:10 [PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() isn't a static function anymore Viresh Kumar
@ 2015-09-15 8:14 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2015-09-15 8:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael Wysocki
Cc: linaro-kernel, linux-pm, Thomas Gleixner, alexandra.yates,
open list
On 15-09-15, 13:40, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Its used outside of the core file and is exported as well. Drop the
> 'static' keyword from its declaration and fix below build error:
>
> linux/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:241:31: error: static declaration of
> 'cpufreq_cpu_get_raw' follows non-static declaration
>
> Fixes: 503655f70d9b ("cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Use cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() in ->get()")
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Urg, sorry for spamming wrong people (Thomas/Alexandra) for an
unrelated patch.
Have sent the relevant patch with this subject now:
"PM / sleep: Fix broken builds without CONFIG_PM_SLEEP_DEBUG"
Though, this fix was also relevant, just sent it to wrong people :(
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index a8252bb0f80c..ef5ed9470de9 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ int cpufreq_generic_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_generic_init);
>
> -static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(unsigned int cpu)
> +struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
>
> --
> 2.4.0
>
--
viresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-15 8:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-09-15 8:10 [PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() isn't a static function anymore Viresh Kumar
2015-09-15 8:14 ` Viresh Kumar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox