* [PATCH] staging: ccree: fix boolreturn.cocci warning @ 2017-10-16 10:09 sunil.m 2017-10-16 21:19 ` Tobin C. Harding 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: sunil.m @ 2017-10-16 10:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gilad, gregkh Cc: linux-crypto, driverdev-devel, devel, linux-kernel, karthik, Suniel Mahesh From: Suniel Mahesh <sunil.m@techveda.org> This fixes the following coccinelle warning: WARNING: return of 0/1 in function 'ssi_is_hw_key' with return type bool. Signed-off-by: Suniel Mahesh <sunil.m@techveda.org> --- Note: - Patch was tested and built(ARCH=arm) on latest linux-next. - No build issues reported, however it was not tested on real hardware. - Please discard this changeset, if this is not helping the code look better. --- drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h b/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h index c9a83df..f499962 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h +++ b/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ struct arm_hw_key_info { static inline bool ssi_is_hw_key(struct crypto_tfm *tfm) { - return 0; + return false; } #endif /* CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_HW_KEY */ -- 1.9.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] staging: ccree: fix boolreturn.cocci warning 2017-10-16 10:09 [PATCH] staging: ccree: fix boolreturn.cocci warning sunil.m @ 2017-10-16 21:19 ` Tobin C. Harding 2017-10-18 2:12 ` [PATCH v2] " sunil.m 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Tobin C. Harding @ 2017-10-16 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: sunil.m Cc: gilad, gregkh, devel, driverdev-devel, karthik, linux-kernel, linux-crypto On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 03:39:57PM +0530, sunil.m@techveda.org wrote: > From: Suniel Mahesh <sunil.m@techveda.org> > > This fixes the following coccinelle warning: > WARNING: return of 0/1 in function 'ssi_is_hw_key' with return type bool. Perhaps Coccinelle emits WARNING: return of 0/1 in function 'ssi_is_hw_key' with return type bool. Return 'false' instead of 0. > Signed-off-by: Suniel Mahesh <sunil.m@techveda.org> > --- > Note: > - Patch was tested and built(ARCH=arm) on latest > linux-next. > - No build issues reported, however it was not > tested on real hardware. > - Please discard this changeset, if this is not > helping the code look better. > --- > drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h b/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h > index c9a83df..f499962 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h > +++ b/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h > @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ struct arm_hw_key_info { > > static inline bool ssi_is_hw_key(struct crypto_tfm *tfm) > { > - return 0; > + return false; > } Hope this helps, Tobin. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] staging: ccree: fix boolreturn.cocci warning 2017-10-16 21:19 ` Tobin C. Harding @ 2017-10-18 2:12 ` sunil.m 2017-10-18 2:36 ` Tobin C. Harding 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: sunil.m @ 2017-10-18 2:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gilad, gregkh, me Cc: linux-crypto, driverdev-devel, devel, linux-kernel, karthik, Suniel Mahesh From: Suniel Mahesh <sunil.m@techveda.org> Return "false" instead of 0. This fixes the following coccinelle warning: WARNING: return of 0/1 in function 'ssi_is_hw_key' with return type bool. Signed-off-by: Suniel Mahesh <sunil.m@techveda.org> --- Changes for v2: - Changed the commit log to give a more accurate description of the changeset as suggested by Toby C.Harding. --- Note: - Patch was built(ARCH=arm) on latest linux-next. - No build issues reported, however it was not tested on real hardware. - Please discard this changeset, if this is not helping the code look better. --- drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h b/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h index c9a83df..f499962 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h +++ b/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ struct arm_hw_key_info { static inline bool ssi_is_hw_key(struct crypto_tfm *tfm) { - return 0; + return false; } #endif /* CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_HW_KEY */ -- 1.9.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] staging: ccree: fix boolreturn.cocci warning 2017-10-18 2:12 ` [PATCH v2] " sunil.m @ 2017-10-18 2:36 ` Tobin C. Harding 2017-10-18 6:41 ` [PATCH v3] " sunil.m 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Tobin C. Harding @ 2017-10-18 2:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: sunil.m Cc: gilad, gregkh, linux-crypto, driverdev-devel, devel, linux-kernel, karthik On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 07:42:53AM +0530, sunil.m@techveda.org wrote: > From: Suniel Mahesh <sunil.m@techveda.org> > > Return "false" instead of 0. > > This fixes the following coccinelle warning: > WARNING: return of 0/1 in function 'ssi_is_hw_key' with return type bool. So close! The order of problem description and fix is inverted. What about ``` coccinelle emits: WARNING: return of 0/1 in function 'ssi_is_hw_key' with return type bool. Return "false" instead of 0. ``` Good luck, Tobin. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3] staging: ccree: fix boolreturn.cocci warning 2017-10-18 2:36 ` Tobin C. Harding @ 2017-10-18 6:41 ` sunil.m 2017-10-18 20:54 ` Tobin C. Harding 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: sunil.m @ 2017-10-18 6:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gilad, gregkh, me Cc: linux-crypto, driverdev-devel, devel, linux-kernel, karthik, Suniel Mahesh From: Suniel Mahesh <sunil.m@techveda.org> This fixes the following coccinelle warning: WARNING: return of 0/1 in function 'ssi_is_hw_key' with return type bool. return "false" instead of 0. Signed-off-by: Suniel Mahesh <sunil.m@techveda.org> --- Changes for v3: - Changed the commit log even more to give an accurate description of the changeset as suggested by Toby C.Harding. --- Changes for v2: - Changed the commit log to give a more accurate description of the changeset as suggested by Toby C.Harding. --- Note: - Patch was built(ARCH=arm) on latest linux-next. - No build issues reported, however it was not tested on real hardware. - Please discard this changeset, if this is not helping the code look better. --- drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h b/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h index c9a83df..f499962 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h +++ b/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ struct arm_hw_key_info { static inline bool ssi_is_hw_key(struct crypto_tfm *tfm) { - return 0; + return false; } #endif /* CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_HW_KEY */ -- 1.9.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] staging: ccree: fix boolreturn.cocci warning 2017-10-18 6:41 ` [PATCH v3] " sunil.m @ 2017-10-18 20:54 ` Tobin C. Harding 2017-10-19 6:22 ` Suniel Mahesh 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Tobin C. Harding @ 2017-10-18 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: sunil.m Cc: gilad, gregkh, linux-crypto, driverdev-devel, devel, linux-kernel, karthik Hi Suniel, Well done with you continued versions. I am being particularly nit picky here but since we are striving for perfection I'm sure will humour me. If English is not your first language please forgive me for picking you up on language subtleties. On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:11:55PM +0530, sunil.m@techveda.org wrote: > From: Suniel Mahesh <sunil.m@techveda.org> > > This fixes the following coccinelle warning: > WARNING: return of 0/1 in function 'ssi_is_hw_key' with return type bool. This should be a description of the problem, so saying _why_ there is a problem or _what_ is wrong with the code currently that warrants a patch. Sometimes while describing the problem you may include descriptions of the solution especially it is not immediately obvious why your proposed solution fixes the issue being explained. As an extra we shouldn't ever say 'This patch ...' or 'This does xyz'. > return "false" instead of 0. Perfect, this is in imperative mood. Spot on! > Signed-off-by: Suniel Mahesh <sunil.m@techveda.org> > --- > Changes for v3: > - Changed the commit log even more to give an accurate > description of the changeset as suggested by Toby C.Harding. My name is Tobin :) > --- > Changes for v2: > - Changed the commit log to give a more accurate description > of the changeset as suggested by Toby C.Harding. > --- > Note: > - Patch was built(ARCH=arm) on latest linux-next. > - No build issues reported, however it was not > tested on real hardware. > - Please discard this changeset, if this is not > helping the code look better. > --- > drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h b/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h > index c9a83df..f499962 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h > +++ b/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h > @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ struct arm_hw_key_info { > > static inline bool ssi_is_hw_key(struct crypto_tfm *tfm) > { > - return 0; > + return false; > } > > #endif /* CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_HW_KEY */ > -- > 1.9.1 > For what it's worth, Reviewed-by: Tobin C. Harding <me@tobin.cc> As stated I am being particularly 'nit picky', the commit log is _probably_ good enough to be merged, I am not a maintainer though so it's not really anything to do with me. I do know however that sometimes patches go to the bottom of Greg's list if they have comments/suggestions. I mention this only so you learn more about the process and to help you with successfully getting you patches merged. Keep up the work! Good luck, Tobin. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] staging: ccree: fix boolreturn.cocci warning 2017-10-18 20:54 ` Tobin C. Harding @ 2017-10-19 6:22 ` Suniel Mahesh 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Suniel Mahesh @ 2017-10-19 6:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tobin C. Harding Cc: gilad, gregkh, linux-crypto, driverdev-devel, devel, linux-kernel, karthik On Thursday 19 October 2017 02:24 AM, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > Hi Suniel, > > Well done with you continued versions. I am being particularly nit picky here but since we are > striving for perfection I'm sure will humour me. If English is not your first language please > forgive me for picking you up on language subtleties. Hi Tobin, First of all, I thank you very much for the reviews, to be honest I enjoyed the process. Yes all of us, here we are striving for perfection. I am always open to take suggestions from the community to improve things which I am working on and there by improving myself. Yeah English is not my first language, but all my education was done in English, no issues there. > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:11:55PM +0530, sunil.m@techveda.org wrote: >> From: Suniel Mahesh <sunil.m@techveda.org> >> >> This fixes the following coccinelle warning: >> WARNING: return of 0/1 in function 'ssi_is_hw_key' with return type bool. > > This should be a description of the problem, so saying _why_ there is a problem or _what_ is wrong > with the code currently that warrants a patch. Sometimes while describing the problem you may > include descriptions of the solution especially it is not immediately obvious why your proposed > solution fixes the issue being explained. As an extra we shouldn't ever say 'This patch ...' or > 'This does xyz'. > >> return "false" instead of 0. > > Perfect, this is in imperative mood. Spot on! > >> Signed-off-by: Suniel Mahesh <sunil.m@techveda.org> >> --- >> Changes for v3: >> - Changed the commit log even more to give an accurate >> description of the changeset as suggested by Toby C.Harding. > > My name is Tobin :) how did I blind myself, my bad, will be careful and avoid such mistakes moving forward. > >> --- >> Changes for v2: >> - Changed the commit log to give a more accurate description >> of the changeset as suggested by Toby C.Harding. >> --- >> Note: >> - Patch was built(ARCH=arm) on latest linux-next. >> - No build issues reported, however it was not >> tested on real hardware. >> - Please discard this changeset, if this is not >> helping the code look better. >> --- >> drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h b/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h >> index c9a83df..f499962 100644 >> --- a/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h >> +++ b/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_cipher.h >> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ struct arm_hw_key_info { >> >> static inline bool ssi_is_hw_key(struct crypto_tfm *tfm) >> { >> - return 0; >> + return false; >> } >> >> #endif /* CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_HW_KEY */ >> -- >> 1.9.1 >> > > For what it's worth, Reviewed-by: Tobin C. Harding <me@tobin.cc> > > As stated I am being particularly 'nit picky', the commit log is _probably_ good enough to be > merged, I am not a maintainer though so it's not really anything to do with me. I do know however > that sometimes patches go to the bottom of Greg's list if they have comments/suggestions. I mention > this only so you learn more about the process and to help you with successfully getting you patches > merged. Keep up the work! Thanks once again Tobin, I love feedback and that's how we can make this world a better workplace. Suniel > > Good luck, > Tobin. > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-10-19 6:22 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-10-16 10:09 [PATCH] staging: ccree: fix boolreturn.cocci warning sunil.m 2017-10-16 21:19 ` Tobin C. Harding 2017-10-18 2:12 ` [PATCH v2] " sunil.m 2017-10-18 2:36 ` Tobin C. Harding 2017-10-18 6:41 ` [PATCH v3] " sunil.m 2017-10-18 20:54 ` Tobin C. Harding 2017-10-19 6:22 ` Suniel Mahesh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox