From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
Doug Nelson <doug.nelson@intel.com>,
Mohini Narkhede <mohini.narkhede@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] sched: Skip useless sched_balance_running acquisition if load balance is not due
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 20:58:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250416035823.1846307-1-tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> (raw)
At load balance time, balance of last level cache domains and
above needs to be serialized. The scheduler checks the atomic var
sched_balance_running first and then see if time is due for a load
balance. This is an expensive operation as multiple CPUs can attempt
sched_balance_running acquisition at the same time.
On a 2 socket Granite Rapid systems enabling sub-numa cluster and
running OLTP workloads, 7.6% of cpu cycles are spent on cmpxchg of
sched_balance_running. Most of the time, a balance attempt is aborted
immediately after acquiring sched_balance_running as load balance time
is not due.
Instead, check balance due time first before acquiring
sched_balance_running. This skips many useless acquisitions
of sched_balance_running and knocks the 7.6% CPU overhead on
sched_balance_domain() down to 0.05%. Throughput of the OLTP workload
improved by 11%.
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Reported-by: Mohini Narkhede <mohini.narkhede@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mohini Narkhede <mohini.narkhede@intel.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index e43993a4e580..5e5f7a770b2f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -12220,13 +12220,13 @@ static void sched_balance_domains(struct rq *rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
interval = get_sd_balance_interval(sd, busy);
- need_serialize = sd->flags & SD_SERIALIZE;
- if (need_serialize) {
- if (atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(&sched_balance_running, 0, 1))
- goto out;
- }
-
if (time_after_eq(jiffies, sd->last_balance + interval)) {
+ need_serialize = sd->flags & SD_SERIALIZE;
+ if (need_serialize) {
+ if (atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(&sched_balance_running, 0, 1))
+ goto out;
+ }
+
if (sched_balance_rq(cpu, rq, sd, idle, &continue_balancing)) {
/*
* The LBF_DST_PINNED logic could have changed
@@ -12238,9 +12238,9 @@ static void sched_balance_domains(struct rq *rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
}
sd->last_balance = jiffies;
interval = get_sd_balance_interval(sd, busy);
+ if (need_serialize)
+ atomic_set_release(&sched_balance_running, 0);
}
- if (need_serialize)
- atomic_set_release(&sched_balance_running, 0);
out:
if (time_after(next_balance, sd->last_balance + interval)) {
next_balance = sd->last_balance + interval;
--
2.32.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-04-16 3:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-16 3:58 Tim Chen [this message]
2025-04-16 5:30 ` [PATCH] sched: Skip useless sched_balance_running acquisition if load balance is not due Shrikanth Hegde
2025-04-16 6:28 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-04-16 9:16 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-04-16 9:29 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-04-16 9:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-04-16 14:14 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-04-17 11:10 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-18 15:02 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-04-18 17:55 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-04-17 11:31 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-17 12:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-18 5:26 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-18 9:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-18 12:13 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-16 16:19 ` Tim Chen
2025-04-16 17:11 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-04-17 9:19 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-04-17 17:12 ` Tim Chen
2025-05-29 9:00 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-06-04 4:26 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-06-06 13:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-10-27 18:06 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250416035823.1846307-1-tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=doug.nelson@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mohini.narkhede@intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox