From: "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Doug Nelson <doug.nelson@intel.com>,
Mohini Narkhede <mohini.narkhede@intel.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Skip useless sched_balance_running acquisition if load balance is not due
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 12:26:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b38301cb-6d8a-40c5-a84b-c59711ea1548@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250416035823.1846307-1-tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
On 4/16/2025 11:58 AM, Tim Chen wrote:
> At load balance time, balance of last level cache domains and
> above needs to be serialized. The scheduler checks the atomic var
> sched_balance_running first and then see if time is due for a load
> balance. This is an expensive operation as multiple CPUs can attempt
> sched_balance_running acquisition at the same time.
>
> On a 2 socket Granite Rapid systems enabling sub-numa cluster and
> running OLTP workloads, 7.6% of cpu cycles are spent on cmpxchg of
> sched_balance_running. Most of the time, a balance attempt is aborted
> immediately after acquiring sched_balance_running as load balance time
> is not due.
>
> Instead, check balance due time first before acquiring
> sched_balance_running. This skips many useless acquisitions
> of sched_balance_running and knocks the 7.6% CPU overhead on
> sched_balance_domain() down to 0.05%. Throughput of the OLTP workload
> improved by 11%.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> Reported-by: Mohini Narkhede <mohini.narkhede@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Mohini Narkhede <mohini.narkhede@intel.com>
> ---
This change is straightforward(simple enough) to mitigate the
costly atomic operation, it looks good from my understanding, so:
Reviewed-by: Chen Yu yu.c.chen@intel.com
thanks,
Chenyu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-04 4:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-16 3:58 [PATCH] sched: Skip useless sched_balance_running acquisition if load balance is not due Tim Chen
2025-04-16 5:30 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-04-16 6:28 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-04-16 9:16 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-04-16 9:29 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-04-16 9:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-04-16 14:14 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-04-17 11:10 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-18 15:02 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-04-18 17:55 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-04-17 11:31 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-17 12:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-18 5:26 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-18 9:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-18 12:13 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-16 16:19 ` Tim Chen
2025-04-16 17:11 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-04-17 9:19 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-04-17 17:12 ` Tim Chen
2025-05-29 9:00 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-06-04 4:26 ` Chen, Yu C [this message]
2025-06-06 13:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-10-27 18:06 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b38301cb-6d8a-40c5-a84b-c59711ea1548@intel.com \
--to=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=doug.nelson@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mohini.narkhede@intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox