From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH PoC 00/11] x86: strict separation of startup code
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 13:09:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250423110948.1103030-13-ardb+git@google.com> (raw)
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
This is a proof-of-concept series that implements a strict separation
between startup code and ordinary code, where startup code is built in a
way that tolerates being invoked from the initial 1:1 mapping of memory.
The current approach of emitting this code into .head.text and checking
for absolute relocations in that section is not 100% safe, and produces
diagnostics that are sometimes difficult to interpret.
Instead, rely on symbol prefixes, similar to how this is implemented for
the EFI stub and for the startup code in the arm64 port. This ensures
that startup code can only call other startup code, unless a special
symbol alias is emitted that exposes a non-startup routine to the
startup code.
This is somewhat intrusive, as there are many data objects that are
referenced both by startup code and by ordinary code, and an alias needs
to be emitted for each of those.
This ultimately allows the .head.text section to be dropped entirely, as
it no longer has a special significance. Instead, code that only
executes at boot is emitted into .init.text as it should.
This series is presented for discussion only - defconfig should build
and run correctly, but allmodconfig will likely need the last patch
omitted.
Ard Biesheuvel (11):
x86/linkage: Add SYM_PI_ALIAS() macro helper to emit symbol aliases
x86/boot: Move early_setup_gdt() back into head64.c
x86/boot: Disregard __supported_pte_mask in __startup_64()
x86/boot: Add a bunch of PI aliases
HACK: provide __pti_set_user_pgtbl() to startup code
x86/boot: Created a confined code area for startup code
HACK: work around sev-startup.c being omitted for now
x86/boot: Move startup code out of __head section
x86/boot: Disallow absolute symbol references in startup code
x86/boot: Revert "Reject absolute references in .head.text"
x86/boot: Get rid of the .head.text section
arch/x86/boot/startup/Makefile | 26 ++++++++++++++--
arch/x86/boot/startup/gdt_idt.c | 17 ++---------
arch/x86/boot/startup/map_kernel.c | 6 ++--
arch/x86/boot/startup/sev-startup.c | 3 ++
arch/x86/boot/startup/sme.c | 31 ++++++++++++--------
arch/x86/coco/core.c | 2 ++
arch/x86/include/asm/linkage.h | 6 ++++
arch/x86/include/asm/setup.h | 2 ++
arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 1 +
arch/x86/kernel/head64.c | 19 ++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S | 16 +++++++---
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 1 +
arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 9 +++---
arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S | 1 +
arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_amd.c | 2 ++
arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_boot.S | 6 ++--
arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c | 1 +
arch/x86/platform/pvh/head.S | 2 +-
arch/x86/tools/relocs.c | 8 +----
21 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
base-commit: 121c335b36e02d6aefb72501186e060474fdf33c
--
2.49.0.805.g082f7c87e0-goog
next reply other threads:[~2025-04-23 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-23 11:09 Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 01/11] x86/linkage: Add SYM_PI_ALIAS() macro helper to emit symbol aliases Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-24 18:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-24 18:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-24 18:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 02/11] x86/boot: Move early_setup_gdt() back into head64.c Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 03/11] x86/boot: Disregard __supported_pte_mask in __startup_64() Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 04/11] x86/boot: Add a bunch of PI aliases Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 05/11] HACK: provide __pti_set_user_pgtbl() to startup code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 06/11] x86/boot: Created a confined code area for " Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 07/11] HACK: work around sev-startup.c being omitted for now Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 08/11] x86/boot: Move startup code out of __head section Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 09/11] x86/boot: Disallow absolute symbol references in startup code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 10/11] x86/boot: Revert "Reject absolute references in .head.text" Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 11/11] x86/boot: Get rid of the .head.text section Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-24 18:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 00/11] x86: strict separation of startup code Ingo Molnar
2025-04-24 18:16 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250423110948.1103030-13-ardb+git@google.com \
--to=ardb+git@google.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox