From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH PoC 05/11] HACK: provide __pti_set_user_pgtbl() to startup code
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 13:09:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250423110948.1103030-18-ardb+git@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250423110948.1103030-13-ardb+git@google.com>
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
The SME startup code may call out to pti_set_user_pgtbl(), which is not
part of the code corpus that is explicitly built to tolerate execution
from the 1:1 mapping of memory.
Hack around this for now by providing an alternative that just returns
the pgd.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/boot/startup/sme.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/startup/sme.c b/arch/x86/boot/startup/sme.c
index 5738b31c8e60..d55b24cd4d08 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/startup/sme.c
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/startup/sme.c
@@ -564,3 +564,8 @@ void __head sme_enable(struct boot_params *bp)
cc_vendor = CC_VENDOR_AMD;
cc_set_mask(me_mask);
}
+
+pgd_t __pti_set_user_pgtbl(pgd_t *pgdp, pgd_t pgd)
+{
+ return pgd;
+}
--
2.49.0.805.g082f7c87e0-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-23 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-23 11:09 [RFC PATCH PoC 00/11] x86: strict separation of startup code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 01/11] x86/linkage: Add SYM_PI_ALIAS() macro helper to emit symbol aliases Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-24 18:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-24 18:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-24 18:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 02/11] x86/boot: Move early_setup_gdt() back into head64.c Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 03/11] x86/boot: Disregard __supported_pte_mask in __startup_64() Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 04/11] x86/boot: Add a bunch of PI aliases Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 06/11] x86/boot: Created a confined code area for startup code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 07/11] HACK: work around sev-startup.c being omitted for now Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 08/11] x86/boot: Move startup code out of __head section Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 09/11] x86/boot: Disallow absolute symbol references in startup code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 10/11] x86/boot: Revert "Reject absolute references in .head.text" Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 11/11] x86/boot: Get rid of the .head.text section Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-24 18:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 00/11] x86: strict separation of startup code Ingo Molnar
2025-04-24 18:16 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250423110948.1103030-18-ardb+git@google.com \
--to=ardb+git@google.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox