From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH PoC 02/11] x86/boot: Move early_setup_gdt() back into head64.c
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 13:09:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250423110948.1103030-15-ardb+git@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250423110948.1103030-13-ardb+git@google.com>
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Move early_setup_gdt() out of the startup code that is callable from the
1:1 mapping - this is not needed, and instead, it is better to expose
the helper that does reside in __head directly. This reduces the amount
of code that needs special checks for 1:1 execution suitability.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/boot/startup/gdt_idt.c | 15 +--------------
arch/x86/include/asm/setup.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kernel/head64.c | 12 ++++++++++++
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/startup/gdt_idt.c b/arch/x86/boot/startup/gdt_idt.c
index 7e34d0b426b1..a3112a69b06a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/startup/gdt_idt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/startup/gdt_idt.c
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
static gate_desc bringup_idt_table[NUM_EXCEPTION_VECTORS] __page_aligned_data;
/* This may run while still in the direct mapping */
-static void __head startup_64_load_idt(void *vc_handler)
+void __head startup_64_load_idt(void *vc_handler)
{
struct desc_ptr desc = {
.address = (unsigned long)rip_rel_ptr(bringup_idt_table),
@@ -43,19 +43,6 @@ static void __head startup_64_load_idt(void *vc_handler)
native_load_idt(&desc);
}
-/* This is used when running on kernel addresses */
-void early_setup_idt(void)
-{
- void *handler = NULL;
-
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT)) {
- setup_ghcb();
- handler = vc_boot_ghcb;
- }
-
- startup_64_load_idt(handler);
-}
-
/*
* Setup boot CPU state needed before kernel switches to virtual addresses.
*/
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/setup.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/setup.h
index ad9212df0ec0..6324f4c6c545 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/setup.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/setup.h
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ extern void reserve_standard_io_resources(void);
extern void i386_reserve_resources(void);
extern unsigned long __startup_64(unsigned long p2v_offset, struct boot_params *bp);
extern void startup_64_setup_gdt_idt(void);
+extern void startup_64_load_idt(void *vc_handler);
extern void early_setup_idt(void);
extern void __init do_early_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
index 6b68a206fa7f..29226f3ac064 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
@@ -303,3 +303,15 @@ void __init __noreturn x86_64_start_reservations(char *real_mode_data)
start_kernel();
}
+
+void early_setup_idt(void)
+{
+ void *handler = NULL;
+
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT)) {
+ setup_ghcb();
+ handler = vc_boot_ghcb;
+ }
+
+ startup_64_load_idt(handler);
+}
--
2.49.0.805.g082f7c87e0-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-23 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-23 11:09 [RFC PATCH PoC 00/11] x86: strict separation of startup code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 01/11] x86/linkage: Add SYM_PI_ALIAS() macro helper to emit symbol aliases Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-24 18:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-24 18:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-24 18:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-23 11:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 03/11] x86/boot: Disregard __supported_pte_mask in __startup_64() Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 04/11] x86/boot: Add a bunch of PI aliases Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 05/11] HACK: provide __pti_set_user_pgtbl() to startup code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 06/11] x86/boot: Created a confined code area for " Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 07/11] HACK: work around sev-startup.c being omitted for now Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 08/11] x86/boot: Move startup code out of __head section Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 09/11] x86/boot: Disallow absolute symbol references in startup code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 10/11] x86/boot: Revert "Reject absolute references in .head.text" Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-23 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 11/11] x86/boot: Get rid of the .head.text section Ard Biesheuvel
2025-04-24 18:09 ` [RFC PATCH PoC 00/11] x86: strict separation of startup code Ingo Molnar
2025-04-24 18:16 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250423110948.1103030-15-ardb+git@google.com \
--to=ardb+git@google.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox