public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Zhang Yu <zhangyu1@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Jean Philippe-Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
	Alexander Grest <Alexander.Grest@microsoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix CMDQ timeout warning
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 15:43:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251020224353.1408-2-jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251020224353.1408-1-jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com>

While polling for n spaces in the cmdq, the current code instead checks
if the queue is full. If the queue is almost full but not enough space
(<n), then the CMDQ timeout warning is never triggered even if the
polling has exceeded timeout limit.

This patch polls for the availability of exact space instead of full and
emit timeout warning accordingly.

Fixes: 587e6c10a7ce ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Reduce contention during command-queue insertion")
Co-developed-by: Yu Zhang <zhangyu1@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <zhangyu1@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com>
---
v2: - Reduced debug print info (Nicolin)
    - Use a separate irq flags for exclusive lock
    - Handle queue_poll err code other than ETIMEOUT
---
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 66 ++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index bf67d9abc901..6959d99c74a3 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -117,12 +117,6 @@ static bool queue_has_space(struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *q, u32 n)
 	return space >= n;
 }
 
-static bool queue_full(struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *q)
-{
-	return Q_IDX(q, q->prod) == Q_IDX(q, q->cons) &&
-	       Q_WRP(q, q->prod) != Q_WRP(q, q->cons);
-}
-
 static bool queue_empty(struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *q)
 {
 	return Q_IDX(q, q->prod) == Q_IDX(q, q->cons) &&
@@ -612,38 +606,6 @@ static void arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_valid_map(struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
 	__arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_set_valid_map(cmdq, sprod, eprod, false);
 }
 
-/* Wait for the command queue to become non-full */
-static int arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
-					     struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
-					     struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *llq)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-	struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp;
-	int ret = 0;
-
-	/*
-	 * Try to update our copy of cons by grabbing exclusive cmdq access. If
-	 * that fails, spin until somebody else updates it for us.
-	 */
-	if (arm_smmu_cmdq_exclusive_trylock_irqsave(cmdq, flags)) {
-		WRITE_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.cons, readl_relaxed(cmdq->q.cons_reg));
-		arm_smmu_cmdq_exclusive_unlock_irqrestore(cmdq, flags);
-		llq->val = READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.val);
-		return 0;
-	}
-
-	queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp);
-	do {
-		llq->val = READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.val);
-		if (!queue_full(llq))
-			break;
-
-		ret = queue_poll(&qp);
-	} while (!ret);
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
 /*
  * Wait until the SMMU signals a CMD_SYNC completion MSI.
  * Must be called with the cmdq lock held in some capacity.
@@ -775,6 +737,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
 	unsigned long flags;
 	bool owner;
 	struct arm_smmu_ll_queue llq, head;
+	struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	llq.max_n_shift = cmdq->q.llq.max_n_shift;
@@ -785,10 +748,33 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
 	do {
 		u64 old;
 
+		queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp);
 		while (!queue_has_space(&llq, n + sync)) {
+			unsigned long iflags;
+
 			local_irq_restore(flags);
-			if (arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full(smmu, cmdq, &llq))
-				dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev, "CMDQ timeout\n");
+			/*
+			 * Try to update our copy of cons by grabbing exclusive cmdq access. If
+			 * that fails, spin until somebody else updates it for us.
+			 */
+			if (arm_smmu_cmdq_exclusive_trylock_irqsave(cmdq, iflags)) {
+				WRITE_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.cons, readl_relaxed(cmdq->q.cons_reg));
+				arm_smmu_cmdq_exclusive_unlock_irqrestore(cmdq, iflags);
+				llq.val = READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.val);
+				local_irq_save(flags);
+				continue;
+			}
+
+			ret = queue_poll(&qp);
+			if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT) {
+				dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev, "CPU %d CMDQ Timeout, Cons: %08x, Prod: 0x%08x Lock 0x%x\n",
+						    smp_processor_id(), llq.cons, llq.prod, atomic_read(&cmdq->lock));
+				queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp);
+			} else if (ret) {
+				dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev, "CPU %d CMDQ Poll error %d\n",
+						    smp_processor_id(), ret);
+			}
+			llq.val = READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.val);
 			local_irq_save(flags);
 		}
 
-- 
2.43.0


  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-20 22:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-20 22:43 [PATCH v2 0/2] SMMU v3 CMDQ fix and improvement Jacob Pan
2025-10-20 22:43 ` Jacob Pan [this message]
2025-10-30 22:41   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix CMDQ timeout warning Nicolin Chen
2025-11-03 23:16     ` Jacob Pan
2025-11-04  1:23       ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-04 18:25         ` Jacob Pan
2025-11-04 18:48           ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-04 19:37             ` Jacob Pan
2025-10-20 22:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Improve CMDQ lock fairness and efficiency Jacob Pan
2025-10-31  2:00   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-04  1:08     ` Jacob Pan
2025-10-30 15:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] SMMU v3 CMDQ fix and improvement Jacob Pan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251020224353.1408-2-jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com \
    --to=jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=Alexander.Grest@microsoft.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=smostafa@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhangyu1@linux.microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox