public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Zhang Yu <zhangyu1@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Jean Philippe-Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
	Alexander Grest <Alexander.Grest@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix CMDQ timeout warning
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 15:16:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251103151631.0000703a@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aQPptXsqzt6kJS7f@Asurada-Nvidia>

Hi Nicolin,

On Thu, 30 Oct 2025 15:41:57 -0700
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 03:43:52PM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > @@ -785,10 +748,33 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct
> > arm_smmu_device *smmu, do {
> >  		u64 old;
> >  
> > +		queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp);
> >  		while (!queue_has_space(&llq, n + sync)) {
> > +			unsigned long iflags;
> > +
> >  			local_irq_restore(flags);
> > -			if
> > (arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full(smmu, cmdq, &llq))
> > -				dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev,
> > "CMDQ timeout\n");
> > +			/*
> > +			 * Try to update our copy of cons by
> > grabbing exclusive cmdq access. If
> > +			 * that fails, spin until somebody else
> > updates it for us.
> > +			 */
> > +			if
> > (arm_smmu_cmdq_exclusive_trylock_irqsave(cmdq, iflags)) {
> > +				WRITE_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.cons,
> > readl_relaxed(cmdq->q.cons_reg));
> > +
> > arm_smmu_cmdq_exclusive_unlock_irqrestore(cmdq, iflags);
> > +				llq.val =
> > READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.val);
> > +				local_irq_save(flags);  
> 
> I don't quite get the reason why it moves queue_poll_init() and
> add local_irq_save(). It's quite different than what the driver
> has, so it's nicer to explain in the commit message at least.

Let me add the following to the commit message.

The original code has three nested while loops,
do {
	while (!queue_has_space(&llq, n + sync)) {
		// inside arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full
		queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp);
		do {
			if(!queue_full(llq))
				break;
			ret = queue_poll(&qp);

		}while (!ret);
	}
	check exit condition

} while (1);

Now, with this patch we reduced to two nested while loops and
calling queue_has_space() only without checking queue_full.

do {
	queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp);
	while (!queue_has_space(&llq, n + sync)) {
		ret = queue_poll(&qp);
		if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT) {
			dev_err();
			queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp);
		} 
	}
	check exit condition
} while (1);

An additional queue_poll_init is added outside inner while loop to arm
the timer. We can merge the two queue_poll_init with a local bool
variable to track whether init is needed, but IMHO it is not any better.

Adding local_irq_save() just to make sure it pairs up with
local_irq_restore(), no functional changes.

> I still feel that we could just replace the _until_not_full()
> with a _until_has_space()?
Since the current code uses three nested while loops, replacing the
inner _until_not_full() function means means retaining all three nested
while loops and calling queue_has_space in two places - once in the
middle while loop then again in this _until_has_space() function.

I tried to extract the inner loop into a function but it requires
passing in irqflags to restore. Not pretty.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-03 23:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-20 22:43 [PATCH v2 0/2] SMMU v3 CMDQ fix and improvement Jacob Pan
2025-10-20 22:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix CMDQ timeout warning Jacob Pan
2025-10-30 22:41   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-03 23:16     ` Jacob Pan [this message]
2025-11-04  1:23       ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-04 18:25         ` Jacob Pan
2025-11-04 18:48           ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-04 19:37             ` Jacob Pan
2025-10-20 22:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Improve CMDQ lock fairness and efficiency Jacob Pan
2025-10-31  2:00   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-04  1:08     ` Jacob Pan
2025-10-30 15:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] SMMU v3 CMDQ fix and improvement Jacob Pan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251103151631.0000703a@linux.microsoft.com \
    --to=jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=Alexander.Grest@microsoft.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=smostafa@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhangyu1@linux.microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox