From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Zhang Yu <zhangyu1@linux.microsoft.com>,
Jean Philippe-Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
Alexander Grest <Alexander.Grest@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix CMDQ timeout warning
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 17:23:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQlVjtTiqd34I+NC@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251103151631.0000703a@linux.microsoft.com>
On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 03:16:31PM -0800, Jacob Pan wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2025 15:41:57 -0700 Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 03:43:52PM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > I still feel that we could just replace the _until_not_full()
> > with a _until_has_space()?
> Since the current code uses three nested while loops, replacing the
> inner _until_not_full() function means means retaining all three nested
> while loops and calling queue_has_space in two places - once in the
> middle while loop then again in this _until_has_space() function.
>
> I tried to extract the inner loop into a function but it requires
> passing in irqflags to restore. Not pretty.
I think we could do:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 2a8b46b948f05..1211e087dedca 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -138,12 +138,6 @@ static bool queue_has_space(struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *q, u32 n)
return space >= n;
}
-static bool queue_full(struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *q)
-{
- return Q_IDX(q, q->prod) == Q_IDX(q, q->cons) &&
- Q_WRP(q, q->prod) != Q_WRP(q, q->cons);
-}
-
static bool queue_empty(struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *q)
{
return Q_IDX(q, q->prod) == Q_IDX(q, q->cons) &&
@@ -633,14 +627,13 @@ static void arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_valid_map(struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
__arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_set_valid_map(cmdq, sprod, eprod, false);
}
-/* Wait for the command queue to become non-full */
-static int arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
- struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
- struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *llq)
+/* Poll command queue PROD and CONS, using a continued timer */
+static inline void arm_smmu_cmdq_poll(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
+ struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
+ struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *llq,
+ struct arm_smmu_queue_poll *qp)
{
unsigned long flags;
- struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp;
- int ret = 0;
/*
* Try to update our copy of cons by grabbing exclusive cmdq access. If
@@ -650,19 +643,18 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
WRITE_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.cons, readl_relaxed(cmdq->q.cons_reg));
arm_smmu_cmdq_exclusive_unlock_irqrestore(cmdq, flags);
llq->val = READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.val);
- return 0;
+ return;
}
- queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp);
- do {
- llq->val = READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.val);
- if (!queue_full(llq))
- break;
-
- ret = queue_poll(&qp);
- } while (!ret);
-
- return ret;
+ /* queue_poll() returns 0 or -ETIMEDOUT only */
+ if (queue_poll(qp)) {
+ dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev,
+ "CMDQ timeout at prod 0x%08x cons 0x%08x\n",
+ llq->prod, llq->cons);
+ /* Restart the timer */
+ queue_poll_init(smmu, qp);
+ }
+ llq->val = READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.val);
}
/*
@@ -804,12 +796,13 @@ int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
local_irq_save(flags);
llq.val = READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.val);
do {
+ struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp;
u64 old;
+ queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp);
while (!queue_has_space(&llq, n + sync)) {
local_irq_restore(flags);
- if (arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full(smmu, cmdq, &llq))
- dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev, "CMDQ timeout\n");
+ arm_smmu_cmdq_poll(smmu, cmdq, &llq, &qp);
local_irq_save(flags);
}
-----------------------------------------------------------------
And the commit message should point out:
The existing arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full() doesn't fit efficiently
nor ideally to the only caller arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist():
- It uses a new timer at every single call, which fails to limit to the
preset ARM_SMMU_POLL_TIMEOUT_US per issue.
- It has a redundant internal queue_full(), which doesn't detect whether
there is a enough space for number of n commands.
So, rework it to be an inline helper to work with the queue_has_space().
Nicolin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-04 1:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-20 22:43 [PATCH v2 0/2] SMMU v3 CMDQ fix and improvement Jacob Pan
2025-10-20 22:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix CMDQ timeout warning Jacob Pan
2025-10-30 22:41 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-03 23:16 ` Jacob Pan
2025-11-04 1:23 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2025-11-04 18:25 ` Jacob Pan
2025-11-04 18:48 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-04 19:37 ` Jacob Pan
2025-10-20 22:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Improve CMDQ lock fairness and efficiency Jacob Pan
2025-10-31 2:00 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-04 1:08 ` Jacob Pan
2025-10-30 15:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] SMMU v3 CMDQ fix and improvement Jacob Pan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aQlVjtTiqd34I+NC@Asurada-Nvidia \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=Alexander.Grest@microsoft.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangyu1@linux.microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox