public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Zhang Yu <zhangyu1@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Jean Philippe-Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
	Alexander Grest <Alexander.Grest@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix CMDQ timeout warning
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 17:23:26 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQlVjtTiqd34I+NC@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251103151631.0000703a@linux.microsoft.com>

On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 03:16:31PM -0800, Jacob Pan wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2025 15:41:57 -0700 Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 03:43:52PM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > I still feel that we could just replace the _until_not_full()
> > with a _until_has_space()?

> Since the current code uses three nested while loops, replacing the
> inner _until_not_full() function means means retaining all three nested
> while loops and calling queue_has_space in two places - once in the
> middle while loop then again in this _until_has_space() function.
> 
> I tried to extract the inner loop into a function but it requires
> passing in irqflags to restore. Not pretty.

I think we could do:

-----------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 2a8b46b948f05..1211e087dedca 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -138,12 +138,6 @@ static bool queue_has_space(struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *q, u32 n)
 	return space >= n;
 }
 
-static bool queue_full(struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *q)
-{
-	return Q_IDX(q, q->prod) == Q_IDX(q, q->cons) &&
-	       Q_WRP(q, q->prod) != Q_WRP(q, q->cons);
-}
-
 static bool queue_empty(struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *q)
 {
 	return Q_IDX(q, q->prod) == Q_IDX(q, q->cons) &&
@@ -633,14 +627,13 @@ static void arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_valid_map(struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
 	__arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_set_valid_map(cmdq, sprod, eprod, false);
 }
 
-/* Wait for the command queue to become non-full */
-static int arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
-					     struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
-					     struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *llq)
+/* Poll command queue PROD and CONS, using a continued timer */
+static inline void arm_smmu_cmdq_poll(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
+				      struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
+				      struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *llq,
+				      struct arm_smmu_queue_poll *qp)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
-	struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp;
-	int ret = 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * Try to update our copy of cons by grabbing exclusive cmdq access. If
@@ -650,19 +643,18 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
 		WRITE_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.cons, readl_relaxed(cmdq->q.cons_reg));
 		arm_smmu_cmdq_exclusive_unlock_irqrestore(cmdq, flags);
 		llq->val = READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.val);
-		return 0;
+		return;
 	}
 
-	queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp);
-	do {
-		llq->val = READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.val);
-		if (!queue_full(llq))
-			break;
-
-		ret = queue_poll(&qp);
-	} while (!ret);
-
-	return ret;
+	/* queue_poll() returns 0 or -ETIMEDOUT only */
+	if (queue_poll(qp)) {
+		dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev,
+				    "CMDQ timeout at prod 0x%08x cons 0x%08x\n",
+				    llq->prod, llq->cons);
+		/* Restart the timer */
+		queue_poll_init(smmu, qp);
+	}
+	llq->val = READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.val);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -804,12 +796,13 @@ int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 	llq.val = READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.val);
 	do {
+		struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp;
 		u64 old;
 
+		queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp);
 		while (!queue_has_space(&llq, n + sync)) {
 			local_irq_restore(flags);
-			if (arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full(smmu, cmdq, &llq))
-				dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev, "CMDQ timeout\n");
+			arm_smmu_cmdq_poll(smmu, cmdq, &llq, &qp);
 			local_irq_save(flags);
 		}
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------

And the commit message should point out:

The existing arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full() doesn't fit efficiently
nor ideally to the only caller arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist():
 - It uses a new timer at every single call, which fails to limit to the
   preset ARM_SMMU_POLL_TIMEOUT_US per issue.
 - It has a redundant internal queue_full(), which doesn't detect whether
   there is a enough space for number of n commands.

So, rework it to be an inline helper to work with the queue_has_space().

Nicolin

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-04  1:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-20 22:43 [PATCH v2 0/2] SMMU v3 CMDQ fix and improvement Jacob Pan
2025-10-20 22:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix CMDQ timeout warning Jacob Pan
2025-10-30 22:41   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-03 23:16     ` Jacob Pan
2025-11-04  1:23       ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2025-11-04 18:25         ` Jacob Pan
2025-11-04 18:48           ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-04 19:37             ` Jacob Pan
2025-10-20 22:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Improve CMDQ lock fairness and efficiency Jacob Pan
2025-10-31  2:00   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-04  1:08     ` Jacob Pan
2025-10-30 15:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] SMMU v3 CMDQ fix and improvement Jacob Pan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aQlVjtTiqd34I+NC@Asurada-Nvidia \
    --to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=Alexander.Grest@microsoft.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=smostafa@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhangyu1@linux.microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox