Re: [PATCH v3 16/22] iommu/amd: Introduce IOMMUFD vDevice support for AMD

[Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 03:35:29PM +0000, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> @@ -388,6 +388,11 @@
>  #define DTE_GPT_LEVEL_SHIFT	54
>  #define DTE_GPT_LEVEL_MASK	GENMASK_ULL(55, 54)
>  
> +/* vIOMMU bit fields */
> +#define DTE_VIOMMU_EN_SHIFT		15
> +#define DTE_VIOMMU_GDEVICEID_MASK	GENMASK_ULL(31, 16)
> +#define DTE_VIOMMU_GUESTID_MASK		GENMASK_ULL(47, 32)
> +
>  #define GCR3_VALID		0x01ULL
>  
>  /* DTE[128:179] | DTE[184:191] */
> @@ -895,6 +900,9 @@ struct iommu_dev_data {
>  	bool defer_attach;
>  
>  	struct ratelimit_state rs;        /* Ratelimit IOPF messages */
> +
> +	u16 gid;			/* Guest ID */
> +	u16 gDevId;			/* Guest Device ID */
>  };

?

I don't expect this information to ever be stored in a dev_data? why
is it needed here? You should be able to reach the viommu from any
places that would need it.

> @@ -227,6 +227,18 @@ static void set_dte_nested(struct amd_iommu *iommu, struct iommu_domain *dom,
>  
>  	/* Guest paging mode */
>  	new->data[2] |= gdte->dte[2] & DTE_GPT_LEVEL_MASK;
> +
> +	/* vImuEn */
> +	new->data[3] |= 1ULL << DTE_VIOMMU_EN_SHIFT;
> +
> +	/* GDeviceID */
> +	new->data[3] |= FIELD_PREP(DTE_VIOMMU_GDEVICEID_MASK,
> +				   dev_data->gDevId);
> +
> +	/* GuestID */
> +	new->data[3] |= FIELD_PREP(DTE_VIOMMU_GUESTID_MASK,
> +				   dev_data->gid);
> +
>  }

Like here, the iommu_domain should have a path to the viommu if it is
in fact a viommu based nested domain, and only in that case should the
DTE gain the gid/gdevid.

Jason