From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: guzebing <guzebing1612@gmail.com>
Cc: kbusch@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Guzebing <guzebing@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: make firmware activation poll interval configurable
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 08:42:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709064233.GA18381@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260627010610.47768-1-guzebing1612@gmail.com>
On Sat, Jun 27, 2026 at 09:06:10AM +0800, guzebing wrote:
> From: Guzebing <guzebing@bytedance.com>
>
> nvme_fw_act_work() polls the controller processing-paused status every
> 100 ms while firmware activation is pending. Some devices can complete
> online activation in only a few hundred milliseconds, so the fixed
> interval can add noticeable latency before the driver observes
> completion.
>
> Add an nvme_core.fw_act_poll_interval_ms module parameter to make the
> poll interval tunable. Keep the default at 100 ms to preserve existing
> behavior, and accept values from 10 ms to 100 ms so systems that need
> faster completion detection can opt in to a shorter interval.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guzebing <guzebing@bytedance.com>
> ---
> We recently observed this issue while performing online firmware
> updates for Gen5 NVMe SSDs in a production environment.
>
> During firmware activation, the kernel quiesces I/O. Detecting the end
> of firmware activation earlier lets the driver unquiesce I/O earlier,
> which is important for the long-tail I/O latency of production
> workloads.
What value does this device report in the Maximum Time for Firmware
Activation (MTFA) field? It might make sense to scale the polling
time as a fraction of that instead of requiring a manual override.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-27 1:06 [PATCH] nvme: make firmware activation poll interval configurable guzebing
2026-07-06 6:33 ` guzebing
2026-07-09 6:42 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-07-09 9:06 ` guzebing
2026-07-09 15:07 ` Keith Busch
2026-07-10 9:20 ` guzebing
2026-07-13 6:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260709064233.GA18381@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=guzebing1612@gmail.com \
--cc=guzebing@bytedance.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox