From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Wenjie Qi <qwjhust@gmail.com>
Cc: chao@kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
qiwenjie@xiaomi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] f2fs: cache: implement metadata cache
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 14:35:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54d08d5d-297f-4736-bcd5-133b089d093f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260825053959.395465-1-qiwenjie@xiaomi.com>
On 8/25/26 13:39, Wenjie Qi wrote:
> Hi Chao,
>
>> next:
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&cache->tree_lock, flags);
>> nr = radix_tree_gang_lookup(&cache->root, (void **)entries, index,
>> min((unsigned long)F2FS_ONSTACK_CACHES, end - index));
>> ...
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cache->tree_lock, flags);
>> ...
>> if (index < end)
>> goto next;
>
> `nr` bounds each gang lookup, while the outer loop continues until `index`
> reaches `end`. Dropping `tree_lock` between batches is not itself a
> scheduling point.
>
> Is there a scheduling point or another bound on the number of entries that
> this range invalidation can process in one invocation?
Wenjie,
I think it's good to have cond_resched() before "goto next", will fix in below
cases:
- f2fs_cache_wait_on_all_writeback
- f2fs_drop_cache_range
- f2fs_invalidate_compress_pages
Thanks,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-25 6:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-24 13:47 [PATCH] f2fs: introduce metadata cache Chao Yu
2026-08-24 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] f2fs: cache: implement " Chao Yu
2026-08-25 5:39 ` Wenjie Qi
2026-08-25 6:35 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2026-08-24 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] f2fs: cache: initialize meta cache Chao Yu
2026-08-24 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] f2fs: cache: introduce shrinker Chao Yu
2026-08-25 5:42 ` Wenjie Qi
2026-08-25 6:36 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-25 5:42 ` Wenjie Qi
2026-08-25 6:37 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-24 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] f2fs: cache: introduce writeback thread Chao Yu
2026-08-24 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] f2fs: cache: use meta cache Chao Yu
2026-08-25 5:42 ` Wenjie Qi
2026-08-25 6:37 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-24 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] f2fs: cache: initialize node cache Chao Yu
2026-08-24 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] f2fs: cache: use " Chao Yu
2026-08-25 5:43 ` Wenjie Qi
2026-08-25 6:38 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-25 5:43 ` Wenjie Qi
2026-08-25 6:40 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-24 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] f2fs: cache: initialize compress cache Chao Yu
2026-08-24 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] f2fs: cache: use " Chao Yu
2026-08-25 5:43 ` Wenjie Qi
2026-08-25 6:42 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-24 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] f2fs: cache: support fault injection Chao Yu
2026-08-24 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] f2fs: cache: introduce tracepoints Chao Yu
2026-08-24 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] f2fs: cache: show per-cache usage in debugfs Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54d08d5d-297f-4736-bcd5-133b089d093f@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qiwenjie@xiaomi.com \
--cc=qwjhust@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox