From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
To: Radu Rendec <radu@rendec.net>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>,
Dmitry Ilvokhin <d@ilvokhin.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Kieran Bingham <kbingham@kernel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V5 05/15] x86/irq: Suppress unlikely interrupt stats by default
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 16:38:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ik8u80zn.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bb079a11992a63b30b23de438648932182a351ca.camel@rendec.net>
On Thu, Apr 02 2026 at 12:39, Radu Rendec wrote:
>> - inc_irq_stat(SPURIOUS);
>> + irq_stat_inc_and_enable(IRQ_COUNT_SPURIOUS);
>
> This is just a matter of style but for symmetry with inc_irq_stat(), I
> would prepend '__' to the function name and create a wrapper macro that
> adds the 'IRQ_COUNT_' prefix.
>
> And for consistency (you also have inc_perf_irq_stat()) I would call it
> inc_and_enable_irq_stat().
I fundamentaly despise these constructs which do not have a proper name
space prefix. They make it just hard to grep for. Yes, inc_irq_stat()
exists already, but that does not mean we need to proliferate it.
Thanks,
tglx
next parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-11 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260401195625.213446764@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <20260401201348.355938635@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <bb079a11992a63b30b23de438648932182a351ca.camel@rendec.net>
2026-05-11 14:38 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
[not found] ` <SN6PR02MB415762C7718ECDBD0D127A60D451A@SN6PR02MB4157.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
2026-05-11 15:45 ` [patch V5 00/15] Improve /proc/interrupts further Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ik8u80zn.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=d@ilvokhin.com \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kbingham@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
--cc=radu@rendec.net \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox