* [PATCH] drm/sti: hda: Fix bridge leak on component_add() failure
@ 2026-04-24 12:11 Myeonghun Pak
2026-04-27 13:02 ` Luca Ceresoli
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Myeonghun Pak @ 2026-04-24 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alain Volmat, Raphael Gallais-Pou
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard, Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie,
Simona Vetter, dri-devel, linux-kernel, Myeonghun Pak
sti_hda_probe() registers its bridge before adding the component. If
component_add() fails, probe returns the error directly and leaves the
bridge registered.
The remove callback unregisters the bridge, but remove is only called
after a successful probe. Remove the bridge locally when component_add()
fails so the probe error path matches the successful-probe remove path.
Signed-off-by: Myeonghun Pak <mhun512@gmail.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_hda.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_hda.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_hda.c
index b739782788..9223135c93 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_hda.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_hda.c
@@ -741,6 +741,7 @@ static int sti_hda_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct sti_hda *hda;
struct resource *res;
+ int ret;
DRM_INFO("%s\n", __func__);
@@ -783,7 +784,11 @@ static int sti_hda_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, hda);
- return component_add(&pdev->dev, &sti_hda_ops);
+ ret = component_add(&pdev->dev, &sti_hda_ops);
+ if (ret)
+ drm_bridge_remove(&hda->bridge);
+
+ return ret;
}
static void sti_hda_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
--
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] drm/sti: hda: Fix bridge leak on component_add() failure
2026-04-24 12:11 [PATCH] drm/sti: hda: Fix bridge leak on component_add() failure Myeonghun Pak
@ 2026-04-27 13:02 ` Luca Ceresoli
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Luca Ceresoli @ 2026-04-27 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Myeonghun Pak, Alain Volmat, Raphael Gallais-Pou
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard, Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie,
Simona Vetter, dri-devel, linux-kernel
Hello Myeonghun,
On Fri Apr 24, 2026 at 2:11 PM CEST, Myeonghun Pak wrote:
> sti_hda_probe() registers its bridge before adding the component. If
> component_add() fails, probe returns the error directly and leaves the
> bridge registered.
>
> The remove callback unregisters the bridge, but remove is only called
> after a successful probe. Remove the bridge locally when component_add()
> fails so the probe error path matches the successful-probe remove path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Myeonghun Pak <mhun512@gmail.com>
Duplicate of [0]?
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260423200622.325076-1-osama.abdelkader@gmail.com/
Luca
--
Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-04-27 13:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-04-24 12:11 [PATCH] drm/sti: hda: Fix bridge leak on component_add() failure Myeonghun Pak
2026-04-27 13:02 ` Luca Ceresoli
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox